<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California&#8217;s Prop 14: The People vs. The Parties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2010/03/11/californias-prop-14-the-people-vs-the-parties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2010/03/11/californias-prop-14-the-people-vs-the-parties/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2010/03/11/californias-prop-14-the-people-vs-the-parties/comment-page-1/#comment-638553</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=18172#comment-638553</guid>
		<description>The current system is flawed and it gives us ideological polarization in government as a direct result. The voting public is effectively presented with only two viable candidates chosen by ideological parties to represent their respective ideologies an thus the candidates we can choose between are beholden to party ideology and not the people. The voting public needs an honest chance to vote for a candidate that best represents their views. An oath of fealty to a party should not be a requirement to have an honest chance to get elected. Any system that reduces the ability of the parties to enforce that oath of fealty is a step in the right direction. Any oath of fealty should be to the voters, not the parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current system is flawed and it gives us ideological polarization in government as a direct result. The voting public is effectively presented with only two viable candidates chosen by ideological parties to represent their respective ideologies an thus the candidates we can choose between are beholden to party ideology and not the people. The voting public needs an honest chance to vote for a candidate that best represents their views. An oath of fealty to a party should not be a requirement to have an honest chance to get elected. Any system that reduces the ability of the parties to enforce that oath of fealty is a step in the right direction. Any oath of fealty should be to the voters, not the parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Hanks</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2010/03/11/californias-prop-14-the-people-vs-the-parties/comment-page-1/#comment-632749</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Hanks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=18172#comment-632749</guid>
		<description>Agreed!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David P. Summers</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2010/03/11/californias-prop-14-the-people-vs-the-parties/comment-page-1/#comment-632518</link>
		<dc:creator>David P. Summers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=18172#comment-632518</guid>
		<description>An idea that is long overdue.  The modern system needs more than people being forced to choose the lesser of two evils...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An idea that is long overdue.  The modern system needs more than people being forced to choose the lesser of two evils&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

