<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CBO Scores Health Care: $1.3 Trillion Saved Over 20 Years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2010/03/18/cbo-scores-health-care-1-3-trillion-saved-over-20-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2010/03/18/cbo-scores-health-care-1-3-trillion-saved-over-20-years/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2010/03/18/cbo-scores-health-care-1-3-trillion-saved-over-20-years/comment-page-1/#comment-638438</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=18292#comment-638438</guid>
		<description>Republicans have been wrong all year.
Heck, probably all decade - I can&#039;t remember when they were right about anything.

But this group of gopers sticks with the lie to the very end.
Its hard to believe people back that group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans have been wrong all year.<br />
Heck, probably all decade &#8211; I can&#8217;t remember when they were right about anything.</p>
<p>But this group of gopers sticks with the lie to the very end.<br />
Its hard to believe people back that group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerryf</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2010/03/18/cbo-scores-health-care-1-3-trillion-saved-over-20-years/comment-page-1/#comment-637522</link>
		<dc:creator>gerryf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=18292#comment-637522</guid>
		<description>MW,

I know I am being repetitive, but where, exactly, did I say the GOP was responsible for obsructing the bill? Where?  No where. I did not accuse them of obstructing. I accused them of LYING. I accuse them of inciting people to action for the wrong reasons.

I don&#039;t care a whit about obstructing. I agree with you; the Dems being a big tent cannot get their members to agree on it. OK?

My objection to the GOP is they LIE about everything. And I am not talking about the many good points brought up in this thread regarding the pointlessness of the CBO report.

I am talking about the hateful, evil rhetoric that comes spilling from the right about everything that incites the tea party nuts (not all tea partiers are nuts) to do things like SPIT on members of congress, call them N*GGERS, kill doctors who perform abortions, fly planes into federal buildings.

My problem is that the right is not interested in an honest debate; an honest debate that might have made this a better bill. They are interested in defeating the bill because it will get their party back in power so they can hypocritically spend money like drunk sailers, laugh at the notion of bipartisanship, and gorge themselves off of lobbyists dollars and ignore the ethical lapses of their own members</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MW,</p>
<p>I know I am being repetitive, but where, exactly, did I say the GOP was responsible for obsructing the bill? Where?  No where. I did not accuse them of obstructing. I accused them of LYING. I accuse them of inciting people to action for the wrong reasons.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care a whit about obstructing. I agree with you; the Dems being a big tent cannot get their members to agree on it. OK?</p>
<p>My objection to the GOP is they LIE about everything. And I am not talking about the many good points brought up in this thread regarding the pointlessness of the CBO report.</p>
<p>I am talking about the hateful, evil rhetoric that comes spilling from the right about everything that incites the tea party nuts (not all tea partiers are nuts) to do things like SPIT on members of congress, call them N*GGERS, kill doctors who perform abortions, fly planes into federal buildings.</p>
<p>My problem is that the right is not interested in an honest debate; an honest debate that might have made this a better bill. They are interested in defeating the bill because it will get their party back in power so they can hypocritically spend money like drunk sailers, laugh at the notion of bipartisanship, and gorge themselves off of lobbyists dollars and ignore the ethical lapses of their own members</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tully</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2010/03/18/cbo-scores-health-care-1-3-trillion-saved-over-20-years/comment-page-1/#comment-636830</link>
		<dc:creator>Tully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=18292#comment-636830</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Exit question: when is the last time a CBO report was anywhere near the real cost on major entitlement programs? Answer: never, not even on Medicare Part D UNDER BUSH. Be careful what you wish for people.&lt;/i&gt;

Though to be sure, Part D came in &lt;i&gt;under&lt;/i&gt; the budget estimates. But CBO was nowhere close, and it&#039;s the ONLY entitlement that EVER came in under estimate instead of wildly over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Exit question: when is the last time a CBO report was anywhere near the real cost on major entitlement programs? Answer: never, not even on Medicare Part D UNDER BUSH. Be careful what you wish for people.</i></p>
<p>Though to be sure, Part D came in <i>under</i> the budget estimates. But CBO was nowhere close, and it&#8217;s the ONLY entitlement that EVER came in under estimate instead of wildly over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tully</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2010/03/18/cbo-scores-health-care-1-3-trillion-saved-over-20-years/comment-page-1/#comment-636829</link>
		<dc:creator>Tully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=18292#comment-636829</guid>
		<description>Pretty obviously Justin did not actually read the opening letter in the CBO memo, or failed to note what it actually said. As he doesn&#039;t seem to understand the government&#039;s quaint notions of accounting or be able to read a disclaimer, this is unsurprising. The Magic Wand has been waved, therefore he must cheer. 

CBO earlier noted that being bound by the rules of their office in estimates had forced them to double-count much of the Medicare &#039;savings,&quot; a warning that still applies. The current &lt;a href=&quot;http://republicans.waysandmeans.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=177157&quot;&gt;so-called Medicare &quot;savings&quot; total about $525 billion over ten years&lt;/a&gt;, of which roughly $400B is double-counted. Since we can be pretty sure that those cuts will never be enacted (largely because Pelosi and Reid themselves have said they will not) you can tack on $925B right off the bat, doubling the cost right out of the gate. 

Or we can assume those cuts will be made, in which case roughly half of the providers currently taking Medicare will cease doing so. That&#039;ll cheer seniors up, won&#039;t it? 

Also not mentioned is the cost of the unfunded mandates on state governments and the private sector, which are likely to be AT LEAST as much as the cost of the bill itself.  For Tennessee alone the first-year cost of that is $750 million. That&#039;s before they get to SCHIP. Caterpillar Corp figures that they alone will lose $100M/yr to the mandates.

START OVER. DO IT RIGHT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty obviously Justin did not actually read the opening letter in the CBO memo, or failed to note what it actually said. As he doesn&#8217;t seem to understand the government&#8217;s quaint notions of accounting or be able to read a disclaimer, this is unsurprising. The Magic Wand has been waved, therefore he must cheer. </p>
<p>CBO earlier noted that being bound by the rules of their office in estimates had forced them to double-count much of the Medicare &#8216;savings,&#8221; a warning that still applies. The current <a href="http://republicans.waysandmeans.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=177157">so-called Medicare &#8220;savings&#8221; total about $525 billion over ten years</a>, of which roughly $400B is double-counted. Since we can be pretty sure that those cuts will never be enacted (largely because Pelosi and Reid themselves have said they will not) you can tack on $925B right off the bat, doubling the cost right out of the gate. </p>
<p>Or we can assume those cuts will be made, in which case roughly half of the providers currently taking Medicare will cease doing so. That&#8217;ll cheer seniors up, won&#8217;t it? </p>
<p>Also not mentioned is the cost of the unfunded mandates on state governments and the private sector, which are likely to be AT LEAST as much as the cost of the bill itself.  For Tennessee alone the first-year cost of that is $750 million. That&#8217;s before they get to SCHIP. Caterpillar Corp figures that they alone will lose $100M/yr to the mandates.</p>
<p>START OVER. DO IT RIGHT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheColdHardTruth</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2010/03/18/cbo-scores-health-care-1-3-trillion-saved-over-20-years/comment-page-1/#comment-636824</link>
		<dc:creator>TheColdHardTruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=18292#comment-636824</guid>
		<description>Wow.  You&#039;d think from this blog that 1) The CBO&#039;s numbers actually have meaning, 2) That the CBO really projected a huge savings in the 2nd 10 years, which they didn&#039;t. They say anywhere from ZERO to a certain % of GDP MAY happen IF nothing changes, AND everything happens as estimated, 3) That there isn&#039;t any dishonesty in the #&#039;s like taxing all of the first 10 yrs, while paying out only 6, 4) That healthy young people won&#039;t simply pay $695 /yr until/unless they get sick, then they&#039;ll get insurance thereby destroying the supposed savings from adding more people to the pool, 5) that the individual mandate is somehow constitutional (it&#039;s not). You&#039;d think all these things, but you&#039;d be terribly wrong.

You had better believe the Dems will take it on the chin for this lousy bill as well as the bribes, backroom deals, and rule-bending they&#039;re doing to pass it. Plus, the average person is smarter than a liberal, so they understand that the #&#039;s are a joke based on tricks, gimmicks, and rosy estimates that will NEVER happen. Oh, and is anyone gullilble enough to believe that Congress will have the guts to follow through on cutting Medicare by $500 billion? Bye-bye savings......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  You&#8217;d think from this blog that 1) The CBO&#8217;s numbers actually have meaning, 2) That the CBO really projected a huge savings in the 2nd 10 years, which they didn&#8217;t. They say anywhere from ZERO to a certain % of GDP MAY happen IF nothing changes, AND everything happens as estimated, 3) That there isn&#8217;t any dishonesty in the #&#8217;s like taxing all of the first 10 yrs, while paying out only 6, 4) That healthy young people won&#8217;t simply pay $695 /yr until/unless they get sick, then they&#8217;ll get insurance thereby destroying the supposed savings from adding more people to the pool, 5) that the individual mandate is somehow constitutional (it&#8217;s not). You&#8217;d think all these things, but you&#8217;d be terribly wrong.</p>
<p>You had better believe the Dems will take it on the chin for this lousy bill as well as the bribes, backroom deals, and rule-bending they&#8217;re doing to pass it. Plus, the average person is smarter than a liberal, so they understand that the #&#8217;s are a joke based on tricks, gimmicks, and rosy estimates that will NEVER happen. Oh, and is anyone gullilble enough to believe that Congress will have the guts to follow through on cutting Medicare by $500 billion? Bye-bye savings&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Jalbert</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2010/03/18/cbo-scores-health-care-1-3-trillion-saved-over-20-years/comment-page-1/#comment-636819</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Jalbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=18292#comment-636819</guid>
		<description>figures lie and liars figure.  Stay well my friends...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>figures lie and liars figure.  Stay well my friends&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wmw</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2010/03/18/cbo-scores-health-care-1-3-trillion-saved-over-20-years/comment-page-1/#comment-636816</link>
		<dc:creator>wmw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=18292#comment-636816</guid>
		<description>Come on people. This is not about REDUCING the deficit, reducing spending, etc... You can twist the numbers however to tell the story to make your viewpoint look good. Just a look at the numbers and a little simple math tell you that what is really happening here is a dramatic increase in taxes, government power and intrusion into our lives.

First 10 years of the plan:

 -$1 Trillion       - &gt;   Cost of the plan
+$0.5 Trillion    - &gt;   Savings from medicare and other cuts
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
=$0.13 Trillion   -&gt;   Reduction of the deficit???

The math simply doesn&#039;t add up.....unless you RAISE TAXES BY $630,000,000,000 DOLLARS!!

If this is really about redicing the deficit, why not just make the $500B in cuts, raies $630B in taxes, and then cut the deficit by over $1T????

Don&#039;t just take these sleezy politicions numbers as the gospel and believe what they say. Think about it a little. Be open minded and use common sense. Do not be governed by your emotions....i.e. you think HC needs fixing and any old plan will work and anything that supports that is great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on people. This is not about REDUCING the deficit, reducing spending, etc&#8230; You can twist the numbers however to tell the story to make your viewpoint look good. Just a look at the numbers and a little simple math tell you that what is really happening here is a dramatic increase in taxes, government power and intrusion into our lives.</p>
<p>First 10 years of the plan:</p>
<p> -$1 Trillion       &#8211; &gt;   Cost of the plan<br />
+$0.5 Trillion    &#8211; &gt;   Savings from medicare and other cuts<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
=$0.13 Trillion   -&gt;   Reduction of the deficit???</p>
<p>The math simply doesn&#8217;t add up&#8230;..unless you RAISE TAXES BY $630,000,000,000 DOLLARS!!</p>
<p>If this is really about redicing the deficit, why not just make the $500B in cuts, raies $630B in taxes, and then cut the deficit by over $1T????</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t just take these sleezy politicions numbers as the gospel and believe what they say. Think about it a little. Be open minded and use common sense. Do not be governed by your emotions&#8230;.i.e. you think HC needs fixing and any old plan will work and anything that supports that is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GJMerits</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2010/03/18/cbo-scores-health-care-1-3-trillion-saved-over-20-years/comment-page-1/#comment-636814</link>
		<dc:creator>GJMerits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=18292#comment-636814</guid>
		<description>That number is nowhere in the CBO report.  I am not kidding - it&#039;s not.  They make a project of a percentage of GDP and Nancy project out to what the GDP will be in 2020 and comes up with this number.  My God, is everybody stupid or something.  Reading is fundamental.  This bill is going to cost us a boatload.  I&#039;m from Canada and my wife from GB.  The NHS is called the &quot;60 year failure&quot; over in GB.  The populations are 30 million and 60 million respectively.  We are about to try this on 300 million people.  Look at California - practically if not literally bankrupt.  Do you really want this here?

Exit question:  when is the last time a CBO report was anywhere near the real cost on major entitlement programs?  Answer:  never, not even on Medicare Part D UNDER BUSH.  Be careful what you wish for people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That number is nowhere in the CBO report.  I am not kidding &#8211; it&#8217;s not.  They make a project of a percentage of GDP and Nancy project out to what the GDP will be in 2020 and comes up with this number.  My God, is everybody stupid or something.  Reading is fundamental.  This bill is going to cost us a boatload.  I&#8217;m from Canada and my wife from GB.  The NHS is called the &#8220;60 year failure&#8221; over in GB.  The populations are 30 million and 60 million respectively.  We are about to try this on 300 million people.  Look at California &#8211; practically if not literally bankrupt.  Do you really want this here?</p>
<p>Exit question:  when is the last time a CBO report was anywhere near the real cost on major entitlement programs?  Answer:  never, not even on Medicare Part D UNDER BUSH.  Be careful what you wish for people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t22</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2010/03/18/cbo-scores-health-care-1-3-trillion-saved-over-20-years/comment-page-1/#comment-636813</link>
		<dc:creator>t22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=18292#comment-636813</guid>
		<description>There is no way they&#039;re going to cut funds from Medicare advantage, doctors will simply refuse it or the costs will go up for payers since the administrators will have to spend more time navigating the rules.  Besides, the people who have the coverage are the ones who are going to pay the difference that government does not pay.   A tax on &quot;cadillac&quot; plans is also ridiculous.  So people that want to pay for more coverage won&#039;t be able to or will be taxed.  This will cause greater out of pocket expense for people that had good coverage previously.  They may not have to change, but their costs will be prohibitive - and this will hurt the people who need insurance the most, the hardest.  

Finally, we&#039;re somehow going to pay for insurance for 30 million people and somehow that&#039;s going to bring the deficit down?  How does that work?  Seriously this defies common sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no way they&#8217;re going to cut funds from Medicare advantage, doctors will simply refuse it or the costs will go up for payers since the administrators will have to spend more time navigating the rules.  Besides, the people who have the coverage are the ones who are going to pay the difference that government does not pay.   A tax on &#8220;cadillac&#8221; plans is also ridiculous.  So people that want to pay for more coverage won&#8217;t be able to or will be taxed.  This will cause greater out of pocket expense for people that had good coverage previously.  They may not have to change, but their costs will be prohibitive &#8211; and this will hurt the people who need insurance the most, the hardest.  </p>
<p>Finally, we&#8217;re somehow going to pay for insurance for 30 million people and somehow that&#8217;s going to bring the deficit down?  How does that work?  Seriously this defies common sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doomed</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2010/03/18/cbo-scores-health-care-1-3-trillion-saved-over-20-years/comment-page-1/#comment-636777</link>
		<dc:creator>Doomed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=18292#comment-636777</guid>
		<description>This time next year all those Democrats who lost their jobs will be the head of NASA, The head of an EVIL CORPORATION that the progressives hate, Ambassadors, Federal Judges so really, why not vote for health care?  They will actually receive a raise when they lose their jobs.
 
Oh but wait......it gets better.....

This is WHATS BEST FOR AMERICA.............sorta like GOING TO WAR IN IRAQ was best for America.

Oh but really.....this is best for America......it will save us money.....Really.....it will.

REALLY...the war will PAY FOR ITSELF....REALLY.......would we lie to you?

Would we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This time next year all those Democrats who lost their jobs will be the head of NASA, The head of an EVIL CORPORATION that the progressives hate, Ambassadors, Federal Judges so really, why not vote for health care?  They will actually receive a raise when they lose their jobs.</p>
<p>Oh but wait&#8230;&#8230;it gets better&#8230;..</p>
<p>This is WHATS BEST FOR AMERICA&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.sorta like GOING TO WAR IN IRAQ was best for America.</p>
<p>Oh but really&#8230;..this is best for America&#8230;&#8230;it will save us money&#8230;..Really&#8230;..it will.</p>
<p>REALLY&#8230;the war will PAY FOR ITSELF&#8230;.REALLY&#8230;&#8230;.would we lie to you?</p>
<p>Would we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2010/03/18/cbo-scores-health-care-1-3-trillion-saved-over-20-years/comment-page-1/#comment-636750</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=18292#comment-636750</guid>
		<description>@gerryf
I know I am being repetitive, but it is, has been, and will continue to be only Democrats that are responsible for either obstructing this bill or passing this bill.  The GOP has nothing to do with its success or failure,  except as spectators making comments from the peanut gallery. There is, in fact, bipartisan support for stopping this bill, but I don&#039;t think it will be sufficient to overcome the One Party Democratic rule currently controlling both legislative and executive branches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@gerryf<br />
I know I am being repetitive, but it is, has been, and will continue to be only Democrats that are responsible for either obstructing this bill or passing this bill.  The GOP has nothing to do with its success or failure,  except as spectators making comments from the peanut gallery. There is, in fact, bipartisan support for stopping this bill, but I don&#8217;t think it will be sufficient to overcome the One Party Democratic rule currently controlling both legislative and executive branches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike B</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2010/03/18/cbo-scores-health-care-1-3-trillion-saved-over-20-years/comment-page-1/#comment-636574</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=18292#comment-636574</guid>
		<description>Wow, it is incredible that so many people can promise so many things and try to tell us that it is all paid for.  Do you really think that we are a bunch of fools?  To get these massive government programs passed politicians always underestimate the costs.  It has been shown time and time again that government can not deliver what it tries to promise and yet we still get the same old promises.  Shame on president Obama and shame on you for writing this baloney in this article!  If passed, this reform will lead to national bankruptcy.  How much health care will we have then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, it is incredible that so many people can promise so many things and try to tell us that it is all paid for.  Do you really think that we are a bunch of fools?  To get these massive government programs passed politicians always underestimate the costs.  It has been shown time and time again that government can not deliver what it tries to promise and yet we still get the same old promises.  Shame on president Obama and shame on you for writing this baloney in this article!  If passed, this reform will lead to national bankruptcy.  How much health care will we have then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superdestroyer</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2010/03/18/cbo-scores-health-care-1-3-trillion-saved-over-20-years/comment-page-1/#comment-636397</link>
		<dc:creator>superdestroyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=18292#comment-636397</guid>
		<description>The cuts to medicare will never happen.  Medicare currently has the lowest reimbursement rates in all of medicine.  A 20% cuts will cause almost all health care providers to stop caring for Medicare patients.  

thus, all of the savings are phony as was the promise not to provide care to illegal aliens.  

In the end, the program will be a failure and will be used as an excuse to nationalize health care. 

Why would anyone want to plan on having a career in health care when facing massive cuts.  Everyone should start planning on a job with the government because that is the only place where the middle class will be able to have a good paying job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cuts to medicare will never happen.  Medicare currently has the lowest reimbursement rates in all of medicine.  A 20% cuts will cause almost all health care providers to stop caring for Medicare patients.  </p>
<p>thus, all of the savings are phony as was the promise not to provide care to illegal aliens.  </p>
<p>In the end, the program will be a failure and will be used as an excuse to nationalize health care. </p>
<p>Why would anyone want to plan on having a career in health care when facing massive cuts.  Everyone should start planning on a job with the government because that is the only place where the middle class will be able to have a good paying job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kranky kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2010/03/18/cbo-scores-health-care-1-3-trillion-saved-over-20-years/comment-page-1/#comment-636336</link>
		<dc:creator>kranky kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=18292#comment-636336</guid>
		<description>&lt;/blockquote&gt;The program would be paid for by slicing nearly $500 billion from Medicare and other federal health programs, particularly a privately operated insurance plan known as Medicare Advantage.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, if these slices really happen. I don&#039;t believe that the lower mandated reimbursements to medicare providers will really happen. 

Hopefully someone will keep track of whether these savings actually materialize.

I also think it&#039;s dishonest to begin collecting extra revenue now for components that don&#039;t kick in until 2013, and then include all that extra revenue when doing the accounting. What matters is whether the new plan really will be a cost saver on an annual pay-go basis. The gov&#039;t is using the kind of accounting that any ranting whacko progressive would crucify an evil corporation for using.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The program would be paid for by slicing nearly $500 billion from Medicare and other federal health programs, particularly a privately operated insurance plan known as Medicare Advantage.</p>
<p>Yeah, if these slices really happen. I don&#8217;t believe that the lower mandated reimbursements to medicare providers will really happen. </p>
<p>Hopefully someone will keep track of whether these savings actually materialize.</p>
<p>I also think it&#8217;s dishonest to begin collecting extra revenue now for components that don&#8217;t kick in until 2013, and then include all that extra revenue when doing the accounting. What matters is whether the new plan really will be a cost saver on an annual pay-go basis. The gov&#8217;t is using the kind of accounting that any ranting whacko progressive would crucify an evil corporation for using.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerryf</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2010/03/18/cbo-scores-health-care-1-3-trillion-saved-over-20-years/comment-page-1/#comment-636252</link>
		<dc:creator>gerryf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=18292#comment-636252</guid>
		<description>&lt;Blockquote&gt;....given the details of the bill, it’ll be hard to argue that this is a) a government take over of health care, b) adds to our deficit or c) represents something that will interrupt or upset our health care delivery in any way.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s hard to argue that....why? Because the facts don&#039;t align with the GP rhetoric? When has that ever stopped the GOP before. Invade Irad because they had something to do with 9-11? WMD? Opposing pork? Smaller government? Death panels? Socialized medicine and get your hands of my medicare? We need to fix the banks, but then Sen Shelby is telling everyone who will listen that the GOP will scuttle any plan that reigns in banking and Rep Boehner is hanging out with bankers giving them a pep talk on killing reform.

Please. 

The GOP is absolutely shameless. Truth means nothing to it.

Even Richard Nixon is rolling over in his grave....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;.given the details of the bill, it’ll be hard to argue that this is a) a government take over of health care, b) adds to our deficit or c) represents something that will interrupt or upset our health care delivery in any way.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to argue that&#8230;.why? Because the facts don&#8217;t align with the GP rhetoric? When has that ever stopped the GOP before. Invade Irad because they had something to do with 9-11? WMD? Opposing pork? Smaller government? Death panels? Socialized medicine and get your hands of my medicare? We need to fix the banks, but then Sen Shelby is telling everyone who will listen that the GOP will scuttle any plan that reigns in banking and Rep Boehner is hanging out with bankers giving them a pep talk on killing reform.</p>
<p>Please. </p>
<p>The GOP is absolutely shameless. Truth means nothing to it.</p>
<p>Even Richard Nixon is rolling over in his grave&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

