Coffee Party not for Indepedents and Moderates

By Solomon Kleinsmith | Related entries in Bipartisan, General Politics, Independents, Partisan Nonsense, Politics, tea party

For some people, the development of the new Coffee Party USA organization seemed like a godsend in response to the more extreme elements in the Tea Party movement. At first I thought that this could be the grassroots movement I’d been waiting for – one that actually included moderates independents, and actively worked across ideological divides to look for common ground, rather than partisan gain. In short, I was wrong.

After spending a few months helping organize the Nebraska chapter, helping upgrade sections of the national website and working on a few ad hoc subcommittees trying to build some structure in the organization… it became clear to me that the public reputation of the Coffee Party as a liberal answer to the Tea Party was actually quite true.

Some rumors about the organization showed no evidence of being true however.

The rumors about this being funded by some wealthy liberal entity showed no sign of being true from the inside, or the outside if you’re someone who knows what money looks like in an organization. At every turn, the leadership asked how we could accomplish our goals using free to nearly free options, and a number of things were turned down as options that cost merely a few hundred to a couple thousand dollars.

However, there really isn’t any transparency in the organization, so I have no way to verify whether any of these claims are true or not. I did overhear some upper level people talking about low five digits having been raised, on a conference call, but have no idea where, or if, any of it is being spent, and while there has been talk of there being a board… I have no idea who these people are. For an organization claiming to be bottom up, both of these things are inexcusable, easy to fix, and were ignored when brought up by volunteers internally.

Problems like this… fundamental organizational issues, easy to fix and ignored by the leadership… are endemic internally at Coffee Party USA. If I had to pick one reason, other than the ideological bent, that I left, this would be it.

I also saw no evidence of Coffee Party USA having any direct coordination with Democratic party groups. They did seem intent on being sure to remain independent actors, not pawns of larger forces. This being the case, they had no problem hawking liberal talking points, from liberal icons and sources like President Obama, Paul Krugman, several Huffington Post articles and even Daily Kos.

I saw no evidence of Coffee Party USA being “astroturfed” either. Much to the contrary, they’re easily the most disorganized group of any size I’ve ever been a part of that had been around for more than a few months. The leadership of the organization claimed that they did not have time to do the work necessary to put the foundation of the organization on solid ground, but they of course had plenty of time to put together panel discussions, make promotional videos, pontificate and go on TV shows, among other things.

I took a few weeks off after expressing some of my concerns (along with other people) to see if the leadership would actually do anything about them, and left recently because I saw no efforts towards that. The main selling points for me, were the nonpartisan & non-confrontational tack they took, and how they appeared to look for common ground, rather than further raising the political temperature.

Early communications built an image of a somewhat left leaning organization who’s core was nonpartisan. But over time, as the conversations turned into action, it became clear that this wasn’t the case, and were neither nonpartisan, non-confrontational nor committed to working across traditional partisan divides.

While I was there, there was no active effort to bring people in from the center or right, while the liberal messaging, unwillingness to make it plain that we weren’t in fact a liberal response to the Tea Party (this was brought up several times internally, but rebuffed because they didn’t want to discourage liberal activist members), and with the media predictably painting the Coffee Party as such allowed the organization to be defined as what it in fact is… a liberal grassroots-ish organization.

A quick look at CPUSA’s Facebook page, the website, emails they’ve sent out, message boards and especially the internal conversations, among other things… show a fairly standard liberal grassroots organization. To be plain, this organization wishes to be seen as a nonpartisan group only so it can have a glean of high minded nonpartisanship and gain members in the center so they can better justify their liberal positions.

It didn’t help that the leadership flip flopped on early promises to only support the use of non-confrontational tactics by local chapters. They also flip flopped on a promise to make decisions on what issues the organization would take stances on through open votes among the general membership… among a number of other issues that were brought up internally.

Again, the leadership claimed to not have enough time to do the foundational work that an organization needs to do to be effective. If they have the time to be on panel discussions, make videos, develop new campaign after new campaign, podcasts, blogs, etc etc etc… they have plenty of time to focus on developing the organization. They just choose not to, showing where their priorities were. The most preposterous side of this whole mess was that they actually used the organization as a vehicle for self promotion, promoting the two founders’ documentary through official organization channels. This is clearly unethical.

When people spoke up about some of these issues, the leadership ignored those threads, and usually the conversations would die off after a day or two, with no response or action taken. The issues kept coming up every week or so, and I began to see that they were in no way interested in actually addressing these issues when I received two calls from Billy Wimsatt, one of the top level people, that offered a position higher up in the organization… but only if I would stop bringing up issues I had.

This was unacceptable to me, and should be to most. Independents and moderates beware. Unless you want to be token non-liberals that will be used to reach liberal ends, this is not the organization we’ve been waiting for.


This entry was posted on Saturday, May 29th, 2010 and is filed under Bipartisan, General Politics, Independents, Partisan Nonsense, Politics, tea party. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

10 Responses to “Coffee Party not for Indepedents and Moderates”

  1. Tweets that mention Donklephant » Blog Archive » Coffee Party not for Indepedents and Moderates -- Topsy.com Says:

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ong ah kun and Justin Gardner, Solomon Kleinsmith. Solomon Kleinsmith said: Coffee Party not for Indepedents and Moderates http://bit.ly/dxekSa [...]

  2. kranky kritter Says:

    The obvious me-tooism of the name was a dead giveaway that it would be as lame as most sequels are. What we have right now is widespread agreement that we’re dissatisfied with where things are heading.

    But on the causes and the solutions? Not so much. Both liberals and conservatives are convinced that the causes are the same as they have always been, and that the solutions are the same ones they’ve always touted.

    What’s that a recipe for? Other than volatility and ill temper, I don’t know.

  3. gerryf Says:

    I hate coffee.

  4. Chris Says:

    me too. but i drink tea every day, and I’d have to say that the tea party is probably a poor representation of tea drinkers.

  5. Thomas Says:

    Sadly, without a very clear and universally agreed upon goal: ending segregation, ending a war, ensuring access to reproductive health services, etc. we liberals are notoriously difficult to organize in large numbers. Our ideals are too broad, our world view too egalitarian, our individuality too prized, for rallying progressives to be any easier than herding cats. These are not ideological weaknesses, mind you. Our tolerance of plurality and the wide net of ideas that we cast are our two greatest strengths; they just make it difficult to counter conservatives who generally prefer regimented organizations and are largely willing to follow singular leaders.

    We might do better to play to our own strengths rather than trying to counter the strengths of conservatives. Republicans are good at closing ranks, at approaching their perceived foes as a phalanx would. Progressives and centrists would do better as a swarm.

    I’m not sure the battle imagery is entirely appropriate. The goal, after all, is not to destroy those with whom we disagree but rather to bring them to our way of thinking, and if that proves impossible, preventing them from imposing their will on others. The vitriol and antagonism of the far right, sadly, makes such imagery feel right.

  6. jjray Says:

    The Tea Party is destroying the Republican Party by radicalizing it. If the Coffee Party is the Democrat equivalent of the Tea Party, then it’s a very bad thing. There is an old saying from Lenin, ‘The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.’ That may be the raison d’etre of this new beast.

  7. Chris Says:

    Did the coffee party claim to be something else other than a liberal organization?

  8. Solomon Kleinsmith Says:

    “Did the coffee party claim to be something else other than a liberal organization?”

    Yes. Look back to early communications, videos, mission statements and whatnot from the first two or three months that the Coffee Party was around, and you’ll see a repeated nonpartisan message.

  9. CWren Says:

    Annabel Park is the founder. Google her if you don’t know who she is.
    The Coffee Party may “claim” to be non-partisan – they certainly want to claim that, but their roots (or coffee grounds??) are leftwing.

  10. The Coffee Party « Jadehawk's Blog Says:

    [...] about the Coffee Party that I found while trawling the internet for information about is was this blogpost by a centrist and former participant in it. It was interesting for the inside view of the Coffee [...]

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: