<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Donklephant &#187; North Dakota</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/category/north-dakota/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:01:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>McCain Wins Arkansas, Wyoming, Kansas and North Dakota</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/04/mccain-wins-arkansas-wyoming-kansas-and-north-dakota/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/04/mccain-wins-arkansas-wyoming-kansas-and-north-dakota/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 02:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
What&#8217;s clear at this point is Obama will not get any sort of landslide. 
Apparently the electorate isn&#8217;t THAT angry.
18 electoral votes to McCain.
Moving on&#8230;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/08w47xV1ae7G9/610x.jpg" width="420"/></p>
<p>What&#8217;s clear at this point is Obama will not get any sort of landslide. </p>
<p>Apparently the electorate isn&#8217;t THAT angry.</p>
<p>18 electoral votes to McCain.</p>
<p>Moving on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/04/mccain-wins-arkansas-wyoming-kansas-and-north-dakota/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Dakota</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/01/north-dakota-2/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/01/north-dakota-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 17:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, North Dakota.


I don&#8217;t believe for a moment that Obama will win here, but if the turnout is incredibly high then it could be incredibly close.
Chuck Todd thinks so too&#8230;
The state has seen Democratic success in House and Senate races for years but that hasn&#8217;t trickled up for the presidential since &#8216;64. Could all that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, North Dakota.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.pollster.com/flashcharts/scripts/javascript/loess.js"></script><object width="450" height="346"><param name="chart" value="http://www.pollster.com/flashcharts/flash/swfs/chart.swf?xml=http://www.pollster.com/flashcharts/content/xml/08NDPresGEMvO.xml&#038;choices=Obama,McCain&#038;phone=&#038;ivr=&#038;internet=&#038;mail=&#038;smoothing=&#038;from_date=&#038;to_date=&#038;min_pct=&#038;max_pct=&#038;grid=&#038;points=&#038;trends=&#038;lines=&#038;colors=&#038;e=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="false"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.pollster.com/flashcharts/flash/swfs/chart.swf?xml=http://www.pollster.com/flashcharts/content/xml/08NDPresGEMvO.xml&#038;choices=Obama,McCain&#038;phone=&#038;ivr=&#038;internet=&#038;mail=&#038;smoothing=&#038;from_date=&#038;to_date=&#038;min_pct=&#038;max_pct=&#038;grid=&#038;points=&#038;trends=&#038;lines=&#038;colors=&#038;e=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="false" allowScriptAccess="always" width="450" height="346"></embed></object><br />
<br />
I don&#8217;t believe for a moment that Obama will win here, but if the turnout is incredibly high then it could be incredibly close.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27478547/page/3/">Chuck Todd thinks so too&#8230;</a><br />
<blockquote>The state has seen Democratic success in House and Senate races for years but that hasn&#8217;t trickled up for the presidential since &#8216;64. Could all that change this year? I think so. The key ingredient for Obama? Same-day voter registration; it&#8217;s his ace in the hole.</p></blockquote>
<p>And folks, the idea that we&#8217;re even talking about North Dakota at this point is significant, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>More as it develops&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/01/north-dakota-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early Voting Up Big In North Carolina</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/18/early-voting-in-north-carolina/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/18/early-voting-in-north-carolina/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=9361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It&#8217;s overwhelmingly favoring Obama&#8230;
Across the state, Democrats showed the most first-day enthusiasm. Of the nearly 114,000 first-day voters, 64 percent were Democrats, 21 percent Republicans and 15 percent were unaffiliated. 
African-American turnout was up significantly. Black voters, who make up about 22 percent of registered voters, were 36 percent of Thursday&#8217;s early voters. 
In 2004, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0aqr4WAgVw03Q/610x.jpg" width="420"/></p>
<p>It&#8217;s <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/NC_Turnout_.html">overwhelmingly favoring Obama&#8230;</a><br />
<blockquote>Across the state, Democrats showed the most first-day enthusiasm. Of the nearly 114,000 first-day voters, 64 percent were Democrats, 21 percent Republicans and 15 percent were unaffiliated. </p>
<p>African-American turnout was up significantly. Black voters, who make up about 22 percent of registered voters, were 36 percent of Thursday&#8217;s early voters. </p>
<p>In 2004, blacks made up 18.6 percent of voters.</p></blockquote>
<p>This large percentage of early voting among African Americans follows similar patterns <a href="http://donklephant.com/2008/10/02/african-americans-39-of-early-voters-in-georgia/">in Georgia</a>&#8230;<br />
<blockquote>A disproportionate number of Georgiaâ€™s 194,138 early voters are African-American, in what could be an encouraging sign for Sen. Barack Obamaâ€™s presidential campaign.</p>
<p>As of Wednesday, about 39 percent of those voters â€” 74,961 â€” are African-Americans, Georgia Secretary of State Karen Handelâ€™s office said.</p>
<p>African-Americans make up 29 percent of registered voters in the state, according to Oct.1 figures. They cast 25 percent of the total votes cast in the presidential election four years ago.</p></blockquote>
<p>Simply put, this is the type of turnout you need to win. And if this is happening all across the country, then it hints at a landslide. I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;ll happen, but the signs are starting to point in that direction.</p>
<p>Need more proof?</p>
<p>See the only other <a href="http://donklephant.com/2008/10/17/north-dakota/">&#8220;North&#8221; state in the union</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/18/early-voting-in-north-carolina/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Dakota?</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/17/north-dakota/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/17/north-dakota/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 02:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=9334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really?

Listen folks, I don&#8217;t care what Drudge is saying about a McCain comeback. If Obama is competitive in North Dakota, the chance of the Republican becoming President is, well, as likely as the scenario that FiveThirtyEight is predicting&#8230;

In other words, slim to none to done.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really?</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.pollster.com/flashcharts/scripts/javascript/loess.js"></script><object width="450" height="346"><param name="chart" value="http://www.pollster.com/flashcharts/flash/swfs/chart.swf?xml=http://www.pollster.com/flashcharts/content/xml/08NDPresGEMvO.xml&#038;choices=Obama,McCain&#038;phone=&#038;ivr=&#038;internet=&#038;mail=&#038;smoothing=&#038;from_date=&#038;to_date=&#038;min_pct=&#038;max_pct=&#038;grid=&#038;points=&#038;trends=&#038;lines=&#038;colors=&#038;e=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="false"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.pollster.com/flashcharts/flash/swfs/chart.swf?xml=http://www.pollster.com/flashcharts/content/xml/08NDPresGEMvO.xml&#038;choices=Obama,McCain&#038;phone=&#038;ivr=&#038;internet=&#038;mail=&#038;smoothing=&#038;from_date=&#038;to_date=&#038;min_pct=&#038;max_pct=&#038;grid=&#038;points=&#038;trends=&#038;lines=&#038;colors=&#038;e=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="false" allowScriptAccess="always" width="450" height="346"></embed></object></p>
<p>Listen folks, I don&#8217;t care what Drudge is saying about a McCain comeback. If Obama is competitive in North Dakota, the chance of the Republican becoming President is, well, as likely as the scenario that <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/">FiveThirtyEight</a> is predicting&#8230;</p>
<p><img src="http://img.skitch.com/20081018-fsgagx12j1d6iaujemrhbnrnt.jpg"/></p>
<p>In other words, slim to none to done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/17/north-dakota/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rasmussen: McCain And Obama Tied&#8230;In North Dakota???</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/07/10/rasmussen-mccain-and-obama-tiedin-north-dakota/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2008/07/10/rasmussen-mccain-and-obama-tiedin-north-dakota/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 01:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McCain &#8211; 43%
Obama &#8211; 43%
Some very surprising numbers from a state that went for Bush by 28 points in 2004.
Here are some details&#8230;

McCain is up by double digits with men.
Obama leads by 9 with women
McCain takes 87% of Republicans
Obama takes 79% of Democrats
Obama leads by 18 among Independents
Obama leads by 20 with voters who name [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>McCain</b> &#8211; 43%<br />
<b>Obama</b> &#8211; 43%</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/north_dakota/election_2008_north_dakota_presidential_election">Some very surprising numbers</a> from a state that went for Bush by 28 points in 2004.</p>
<p>Here are some details&#8230;
<ul>
<li>McCain is up by double digits with men.</li>
<li>Obama leads by 9 with women</li>
<li>McCain takes 87% of Republicans</li>
<li>Obama takes 79% of Democrats</li>
<li>Obama leads by 18 among Independents</li>
<li>Obama leads by 20 with voters who name the economy as their most important issue</li>
<li>McCain leads by 37 with voters who name national security as their most important issue</li>
</ul>
<p>And to those last two points&#8230;<br />
<blockquote>Thirty-nine percent (39%) view the economy as most important while 24% say the same about national security.</p></blockquote>
<p>Given that the economy is the number one issue on voters minds right now, McCain better try to untether himself from Bush on this or he risks Obama capturing one or two of these safely red states come election time. After all, Rasmussen showed <a href="http://donklephant.com/2008/07/03/rasmussen-obama-leads-by-5-in-montana/">Obama up by 5 in Montana</a> recently, a state that Bush won by 20 points in 2004 and 25 points in 2000.</p>
<p>More as it develops&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2008/07/10/rasmussen-mccain-and-obama-tiedin-north-dakota/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MSNBC Calls It For Obama</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/06/msnbc-calls-it-for-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/06/msnbc-calls-it-for-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It must have been quite a spread then.
More soon.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0dn6dFubmF6li/610x.jpg" width="420"/></p>
<p>It must have been quite a spread then.</p>
<p>More soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/06/msnbc-calls-it-for-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clinton Goes After Pledged Delegates</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/04/06/clinton-goes-after-pledged-delegates/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2008/04/06/clinton-goes-after-pledged-delegates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 15:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pledged Delegates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You knew it was going to happen. The math is just too stacked against her, so she&#8217;s going after the delegates you&#8217;re not really supposed to go after. 
Sure, you technically can because they technically can switch, but they&#8217;re not really supposed to. Because if they do, that&#8217;s really subverting the will of the voters. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You knew it was going to happen. The math is just too stacked against her, so she&#8217;s going after the delegates you&#8217;re not <i>really</i> supposed to go after. </p>
<p>Sure, you <i>technically</i> can because they <i>technically can switch, but they&#8217;re not really supposed to. Because if they do, that&#8217;s really subverting the will of the voters. And I think it should be stated again, these are the delegates meted out based on the vote of primary voters. If they switch, that overturns the will of the voters.</p>
<p>Obama and Hill were in North Dakota a couple days ago and, well, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Story?id=4596305&#038;page=1">she can speak for herself&#8230;</a><br />
<blockquote>Clinton made it clear to North Dakota Democrats last night that she believes there is no such thing as a pledged delegate and highlighted that stubborn streak in her appeal for delegates to switch from Obama to her when the Democratic national party holds its nominating convention this August.</p>
<p>&#8220;I am here tonight because I am seeking your support,&#8221; Clinton said, adding that she never gives up.</p>
<p>&#8220;I know what it&#8217;s like to stumble. I know what it means to get knocked down. But I&#8217;ve never stayed down. I never will and neither will America if we get ready to win this election in November,&#8221; she said.</p></blockquote>
<p>As I&#8217;ve said before regarding all this stuff about delegates, it&#8217;s certainly within her rights to do whatever she wants, but you can only push this &#8220;fighter&#8221; meme so long before it starts to become a caricature. It&#8217;s like that scene with the Black Knight in </i><i>Monty Python and the Holy Grail</i>. You know, the one where King Arthur keeps cutting off the Black Knight&#8217;s appendages, but he keeps on fighting?</p>
<p>Better to just embed the scene&#8230;</p>
<p><object width="425" height="373"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zKhEw7nD9C4&#038;color1=0x402061&#038;color2=0x9461ca&#038;border=1&#038;hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zKhEw7nD9C4&#038;color1=0x402061&#038;color2=0x9461ca&#038;border=1&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="373"></embed></object></p>
<p>I love the line, &#8220;I move for <i>no</i> man.&#8221; Oddly fitting.</p>
<p>Listen, I&#8217;m not telling Hillary to get out, but let&#8217;s not forget that Obama won Texas&#8230;and didn&#8217;t Bill say she had to win both Ohio and Texas? Yes, she won the popular vote, but these contests aren&#8217;t solely about the popular vote. And even if it were, Obama is leading in that category too overall.</p>
<p>So here&#8217;s the question: does Hillary really want to be know as the Black Knight of the Democratic party?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2008/04/06/clinton-goes-after-pledged-delegates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
