<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Donklephant &#187; Palin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/category/palin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:01:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Newsweek&#8217;s Dumb (And Sexist) Sarah Palin Cover</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/11/18/newsweeks-dumb-and-sexist-sarah-palin-cover/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2009/11/18/newsweeks-dumb-and-sexist-sarah-palin-cover/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=17362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Why oh why oh why oh why?
They gave her an incredibly easy way to ignore the more substantive arguments against her legitimacy as a candidate and focus on their dumb decision to run with the above nonsense.
And this isn&#8217;t just coming from her corner. It&#8217;s coming from Media Matters and other voices in the liberal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/images/item/sexist1.jpg"></p>
<p>Why oh why oh why oh why?</p>
<p>They gave her an incredibly easy way to ignore the more substantive arguments against her legitimacy as a candidate and focus on their dumb decision to run with the above nonsense.</p>
<p>And this isn&#8217;t just coming from her corner. It&#8217;s coming from <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200911170027">Media Matters</a> and other <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/taylor-marsh/what-was-newsweek-thinkin_b_362086.html">voices in the liberal blogosphere</a>.</p>
<p>As they put it&#8230;<br />
<blockquote>Newsweek offers some interesting analysis of Palin and her appeal in its November 23 issue. Unfortunately, its sexist treatment of Palin&#8217;s physical appearance distracts from any legitimate arguments the magazine and its contributors wish to make.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s such a stupid decision it boggles the mind. You run a original head shot of her in this situation, not rerun some picture from Runner&#8217;s World.</p>
<p>Jon Meachum is calling the shots over there, and <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2009/11/18/next-round-in-covergirl-palin-photo-flap/">his response</a> to all this is inane&#8230;<br />
<blockquote>We chose the most interesting image available to us to illustrate the theme of the cover, which is what we always try to do. </p>
<p>We apply the same test to photographs of any public figure, male or female: does the image convey what we are saying? That is a gender-neutral standard.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, so when&#8217;s the last time they ran a photo of any other politician wearing shorts?</p>
<p>Good lord&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2009/11/18/newsweeks-dumb-and-sexist-sarah-palin-cover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Going Postal On &#8220;Going Rogue&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/11/15/going-postal-on-going-rogue/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2009/11/15/going-postal-on-going-rogue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 04:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Mataconis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=17339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not surprisingly, The New York Times review of Sarah Palin&#8217;s Going Rogue: An American Life isn&#8217;t exactly positive:
“Going Rogue,” the title of Sarah Palin’s erratic new memoir, comes from a phrase used by a disgruntled McCain aide to describe her going off-message during the campaign: among other things, for breaking with the campaign over its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not surprisingly, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/books/15book.html">The New York Times review</a> of Sarah Palin&#8217;s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0061939897?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=belowthebeltw-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0061939897">Going Rogue: An American Life</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=belowthebeltw-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=0061939897" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /> isn&#8217;t exactly positive:</p>
<blockquote><p>“Going Rogue,” the title of Sarah Palin’s erratic new memoir, comes from a phrase used by a disgruntled McCain aide to describe her going off-message during the campaign: among other things, for breaking with the campaign over its media strategy and its decision to pull out of Michigan, and for speaking out about reports that the Republican Party had spent more than $150,000 on fancy designer duds for her and her family. In fact, the most sustained and vehement barbs in this book are directed not at Democrats or liberals or the press, but at the McCain campaign. The very campaign that plucked her out of Alaska, anointed her the Republican vice-presidential nominee and made her one of the most talked about women on the planet — someone who could command a reported $5 million for writing this book.</p>
<p>In what reads like payback for McCain aides’ disparaging comments about her in the wake of the ticket’s loss to Barack Obama, Ms. Palin depicts the McCain campaign as overscripted, defeatist, disorganized and dunder-headed — slow to shift focus from the Iraq war to the cratering economy, insufficiently tough on Mr. Obama and contradictory in its media strategy. She also claims that the campaign billed her nearly $50,000 for “having been vetted.” The vetting, which was widely criticized in the press as being cursory and rushed, was, she insists, “thorough”: they knew “exactly what they’re getting.”</p>
<p>(&#8230;)</p>
<p>All in all, Ms. Palin emerges from “Going Rogue” as an eager player in the blame game, thoroughly ungrateful toward the McCain campaign for putting her on the national stage. As for the McCain campaign, it often feels like a desperate and cynical operation, willing to make a risky Hail Mary pass in order to try to score a tactical win, instead of making a considered judgment as to who might be genuinely qualified to sit a heartbeat away from the Oval Office.</p>
<p>In “Going Rogue,” Ms. Palin talks perfunctorily about fiscal responsibility and a muscular foreign policy, and more passionately about the importance of energy independence, but she is quite up front about the fact that much of her appeal lies in her just-folks, “hockey Mom” ordinariness. She pretends no particular familiarity with the Middle East, the Iraq war or Islamic politics — “I knew the history of the conflict,” she writes, “to the extent that most Americans did.” And she argues that “there’s no better training ground for politics than motherhood.”</p>
<p>Yet, Mr. McCain’s astonishing decision to pick someone with so little experience (less than two years as the governor of Alaska, and before that, two terms as mayor of Wasilla, a town with fewer than 7,000 residents) as his running mate and Ms. Palin’s own surprisingly nonchalant reaction to Mr. McCain’s initial phone call about the vice president’s slot (she writes that it felt “like a natural progression”) underscore just how alarmingly expertise is discounted — or equated with elitism — in our increasingly democratized era, and just how thoroughly colorful personal narratives overshadow policy arguments and actual knowledge</p></blockquote>
<p>Rush Limbaugh, meanwhile, calls the tome, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DGlTbvfeWY&#038;feature=player_embedded">&#8220;one of the most substantive policy books I&#8217;ve read.&#8221;</a></p>
<p>Frankly, I didn&#8217;t know Rush had read much more than Dr. Seuss before getting around to this book.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=belowthebeltw-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=8&#038;l=as1&#038;asins=0061939897&#038;fc1=000000&#038;IS2=1&#038;lt1=_blank&#038;m=amazon&#038;lc1=0000FF&#038;bc1=000000&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;f=ifr" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2009/11/15/going-postal-on-going-rogue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP 2012: Mitt Romney Or Sarah Palin?</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/10/24/gop-2012-mitt-romney-or-sarah-palin/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2009/10/24/gop-2012-mitt-romney-or-sarah-palin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Pajama Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=17160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt Lewis breaks it down:
Today, the perfunctory, &#8220;next in line&#8221; theory suggests that the most likely GOP nominee will be former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. While Romney dropped-out of the 2008 campaign earlier than Mike Huckabee, most conservatives concede that Romney finished in second place – and that is certainly the view held by the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Ek1QPFXmY80/St8fAyeQZfI/AAAAAAAAEFk/svdgnME-8aQ/s400/romneypalin.jpg" class="alignright" width="200" />Matt Lewis <a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/10/20/palin-or-romney-republicans-weigh-passion-vs-principle/">breaks it down</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Today, the perfunctory, &#8220;next in line&#8221; theory suggests that the most likely GOP nominee will be former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. While Romney dropped-out of the 2008 campaign earlier than Mike Huckabee, most conservatives concede that Romney finished in second place – and that is certainly the view held by the McCainiacs. So, by the logic that led to the nominations of McCain and Dole, it&#8217;s Romney&#8217;s turn. Even if rank-and-file conservatives find him less than perfect concede that he&#8217;s paid his dues.</p>
<p>But what about the other model? Who is this year&#8217;s Goldwater &#8212; and, just maybe, our Reagan? Who is the person movement conservatives really want? It sure ain&#8217;t Mike Huckabee. And it might be Sarah Palin.</p>
<p>Palin is the only potential candidate on the Republican side with star power. It&#8217;s hard to quantify that trait, but Reagan had it. Ever since his time, Republicans have been convinced that charisma is king. And, as a friend recently told me, &#8220;When liberals continuously deride her, many conservatives take it as an attack upon themselves.&#8221; That&#8217;s a powerful rallying mechanism. Nominating Palin is a way for conservatives to stick it to Eastern elites.</p>
<p>Of course, that doesn&#8217;t mean the Republicans would win; Goldwater certainly didn&#8217;t. If Obama is going to be tough to beat, the question becomes almost a philosophical one: If you&#8217;re going to lose anyway, is it better to lose atop the horse you really want to ride?</p></blockquote>
<p>If you ask <a href="http://thepajamapundit.com/">me</a> (and if you are still reading this then you have done so by default), based on Lewis&#8217; assumptions, Mitt Romney will be the candidate of choice for the Republican party.</p>
<p>Sure, he&#8217;s not perfect, but what candidate is? It&#8217;s not necessarily that he will win over the hearts and minds of the GOP faithful. Rather, it&#8217;s that he&#8217;s a better choice than Sarah Palin. For one glaring reason&#8230;</p>
<p>Sarah Palin quit her job. Period. All Mitt Romney has to do is run ads that say, &#8216;I finished the job in Massachusetts &#8212; you may not always agree with me, but at least you know that I&#8217;ll stick around&#8217;.</p>
<p>Game. Set. Match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2009/10/24/gop-2012-mitt-romney-or-sarah-palin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin&#8217;s &#8220;Going Rogue&#8221; Out November 17th</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/09/28/sarah-palins-going-rogue-out-november-17th/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2009/09/28/sarah-palins-going-rogue-out-november-17th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=17007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Looks like Christmas is coming early this year!
From The AP:
Harper publisher Jonathan Burnham says the former Alaska governor invested herself deeply and passionately in the project. He says the book contains fascinating detail.
The 400-page book is the first for Palin, who has been an object of fascination since Republican Sen. John McCain chose her as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.daylife.com/photo/086N6tW9w25uV?q=Sarah+Palin"><img src="http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/086N6tW9w25uV/610x.jpg" width="430"></a></p>
<p>Looks like Christmas is coming early this year!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jlxDCO3o2Lipkwnit2WjvF0TCa5gD9B0IKGO0">From The AP</a>:<br />
<blockquote>Harper publisher Jonathan Burnham says the former Alaska governor invested herself deeply and passionately in the project. He says the book contains fascinating detail.</p>
<p>The 400-page book is the first for Palin, who has been an object of fascination since Republican Sen. John McCain chose her as his running mate during his 2008 presidential bid. The book will be called &#8220;Going Rogue: An American Life.&#8221;</p>
<p>A huge first printing of 1.5 million copies has been commissioned by Harper, an imprint of HarperCollins.</p></blockquote>
<p>Folks, she&#8217;s laying some serious groundwork for a 2012 run. There&#8217;s really no other reason why she would quit her position as Governor, give speeches in China and write a memoir. </p>
<p>But the question remains&#8230;will she be going for the GOP nomination or will she be &#8220;going rogue?&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry, I had to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2009/09/28/sarah-palins-going-rogue-out-november-17th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Huckabee Leading Contender For 2012 Contest</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/09/24/huckabee-leading-contender-for-2012-contest/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2009/09/24/huckabee-leading-contender-for-2012-contest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=16973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Public Policy Polling pitted the top Republicans (including Jeb Bush) against Obama in a hypothetical matchup and found that the former Arkansas Governor&#8217;s folksy ways puts him at the top of the pack. And this makes sense. Huckabee is amiable, has some ideas that at least sound new (get rid of the IRS, FAIR tax) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.daylife.com/photo/0bFRcIdcDW84d?q=Mike+Huckabee"><img src="http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0bFRcIdcDW84d/610x.jpg" width="430"></a></p>
<p>Public Policy Polling pitted the top Republicans (including Jeb Bush) against Obama in a hypothetical matchup and found that the former Arkansas Governor&#8217;s folksy ways puts him at the top of the pack. And this makes sense. Huckabee is amiable, has some ideas that at least sound new (get rid of the IRS, FAIR tax) and&#8230;ummm&#8230;did I mention he&#8217;s folksy?</p>
<p><a href="http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2009/09/obama-leads-2012-foes.html">From PPP</a>:<br />
<blockquote>Huckabee comes the closest, trailing Obama 48-41. In the six months PPP has run this poll he has been the most competitive Republican every time. Obama&#8217;s lead has increased from 47-44 over the former Arkansas Governor a month ago.</p>
<p>Mitt Romney does next best, down 48-39. In some ways he looks like a stronger general candidate than a primary one though. He has the best favorability of the GOP quartet with Democrats and independents, but only 50% of Republicans have a positive opinion of him compared to 70% for Mike Huckabee and 69% for Sarah Palin. Will he be able to connect well enough with the GOP base to snag the nomination?</p></blockquote>
<p>And here&#8217;s how they all break out:
<ul>
<li>Obama/Huckabee &#8211; 48/41 &#8211; Obama +7</li>
<p></p>
<li>Obama/Romney &#8211; 48/39 &#8211; Obama +9</li>
<p></p>
<li>Obama/Bush &#8211; 50/37 &#8211; Obama +13</li>
<p></p>
<li>Obama/Palin &#8211; 53/38 &#8211; Obama + 15</li>
</ul>
<p>Yes, the thought of Palin scares more people than the thought of another Bush. But both campaigns are DOA. Guaranteed.</p>
<p>To me, the Romney/Huckabee matchup will be the story. Huckabee obviously has the base locked up tight because he&#8217;s so overtly religious, but he scares independents. So he&#8217;ll have to do a lot of work to reach out to moderates. Still, it won&#8217;t be easy. However, even though Romney appeals to fiscal independents, the base doesn&#8217;t trust him. Romney&#8217;s saving grace? Palin. She could fragment Huckabee&#8217;s support just enough to let the more moderate Romney run away with it&#8230;much like Edwards did to Clinton so Obama could thread the needle.</p>
<p>Regardless, I&#8217;m anxious for 2012. Can you tell? :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2009/09/24/huckabee-leading-contender-for-2012-contest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin Endorsed End-Of-Life Counseling As Alaska Governor</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/08/13/palin-endorsed-end-of-life-counseling-as-alaska-governor/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2009/08/13/palin-endorsed-end-of-life-counseling-as-alaska-governor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 01:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partisan Hacks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=16320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Given how intellectually dishonest she was in the past, especially about issues like the Bridge to Nowhere, you knew something like this might pop up.
Apparently she made the following proclamations during Healthcare Decisions Day in Alaska in April 2008.
Here&#8217;s the relevant text&#8230;
WHEREAS, Healthcare Decisions Day is designed to raise public awareness of the need to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.daylife.com/photo/05JW9ddfvvgik?q=Sarah+Palin"><img src="http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/05JW9ddfvvgik/610x.jpg" width="430"></a></p>
<p>Given how intellectually dishonest she was in the past, especially about issues like <a href="http://donklephant.com/2008/09/07/chris-wallace-on-palins-bridge-to-nowhere-support/">the Bridge to Nowhere</a>, you knew something like this might pop up.</p>
<p>Apparently she made the following proclamations during Healthcare Decisions Day in Alaska in April 2008.</p>
<p><a href="http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:_qjXL_3J08EJ:www.eeo.state.ak.us/archive-50122.html+%22HEALTHCARE+DECISIONS+DAY%22+palin&#038;cd=1&#038;hl=en&#038;ct=clnk&#038;gl=us&#038;client=firefox-a">Here&#8217;s the relevant text&#8230;</a><br />
<blockquote>WHEREAS, Healthcare Decisions Day is designed to raise public awareness of the need to plan ahead for healthcare decisions, related to end of life care and medical decision-making whenever patients are unable to speak for themselves and to encourage the specific use of advance directives to communicate these important healthcare decisions. [...]</p>
<p>WHEREAS, one of the principal goals of Healthcare Decisions Day is to encourage hospitals, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, continuing care retirement communities, and hospices to participate in a statewide effort to provide clear and consistent information to the public about advance directives, as well as to encourage medical professionals and lawyers to volunteer their time and efforts to improve public knowledge and increase the number of Alaska’s citizens with advance directives.</p>
<p>WHEREAS, the Foundation for End of Life Care in Juneau, Alaska, and other organizations throughout the United States have endorsed this event and are committed to educating the public about the importance of discussing healthcare choices and executing advance directives.</p></blockquote>
<p>And so it goes&#8230;</p>
<p>By the way, <a href="http://www.facebook.com/sarahpalin#/note.php?note_id=116471698434">Palin posted some more</a> about end of life counseling on her Facebook page, and this time she&#8217;s trying to justify her previous post by suggesting that just because end-of-life counseling can be offered if a patient comes into a facility with serious enough conditions to warrant it that this somehow means that the government would be in the business of putting people to death.</p>
<p>Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2009/08/13/palin-endorsed-end-of-life-counseling-as-alaska-governor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin Jumps On The &#8220;Obama Will Kill Your Family&#8221; Bandwagon</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/08/07/palin-jumps-on-the-obama-will-kill-your-family-bandwagon/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2009/08/07/palin-jumps-on-the-obama-will-kill-your-family-bandwagon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 04:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=16179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Not only that, she uses her family members as examples and cites Michele Bachmann as a source for her info.
It just keeps getting stranger and stranger&#8230;
Read over at True/Slant.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0aq57qI4ox8pX/610x.jpg" width="430"></p>
<p>Not only that, she uses her family members as examples and cites Michele Bachmann as a source for her info.</p>
<p>It just keeps getting stranger and stranger&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://trueslant.com/justingardner/2009/08/07/palin-uses-her-family-to-spread-health-care-lies/">Read over at True/Slant</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2009/08/07/palin-jumps-on-the-obama-will-kill-your-family-bandwagon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Palin And Romney Face Uphill Battle In 2012</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/30/poll-palin-and-romney-face-uphill-battle-in-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/30/poll-palin-and-romney-face-uphill-battle-in-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
A new NBC/WSJ poll has some sobering news for both of the 2012 hopefuls.
From MSNBC:
Palin stepped down from office on Sunday, and could be eyeing a presidential bid in 2012. But according to the poll, a whopping 67 percent of Americans â€” and 43 percent of Republicans â€” say they would not like to see [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.daylife.com/photo/0bJtat66XT1bB?q=palin+romney"><img src="http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0bJtat66XT1bB/610x.jpg" width="430"></a></p>
<p>A new NBC/WSJ poll has some sobering news for both of the 2012 hopefuls.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32206998/ns/politics-white_house/page/2/">From MSNBC</a>:<br />
<blockquote>Palin stepped down from office on Sunday, and could be eyeing a presidential bid in 2012. But according to the poll, a whopping 67 percent of Americans â€” and 43 percent of Republicans â€” say they would not like to see her president someday.</p>
<p>By comparison, 50 percent of the public â€” and 33 percent of Republicans â€” say they donâ€™t want to see Mitt Romney, another possible 2012 contender, become president. </p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve always thought Palin was box office poison when it came to the national stage, but these numbers about Romney surprise me. 33 percent? Really?</p>
<p>Maybe a guy like Pawlenty could breakthrough in 2012 after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/30/poll-palin-and-romney-face-uphill-battle-in-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shatner Takes On Sarah Palin&#8217;s Parting Poem</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/28/shatner-takes-on-sarah-palins-parting-poem/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/28/shatner-takes-on-sarah-palins-parting-poem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#8217;t comment on her farewell speech because I didn&#8217;t want to sound mean yet again.
Best to let it speak for itself!
Shatner reads a part of her speech verbatim.


So good.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t comment on her farewell speech because I didn&#8217;t want to sound mean yet again.</p>
<p>Best to let it speak for itself!</p>
<p>Shatner reads a part of her speech verbatim.</p>
<p><object width="430" height="248"><param name="movie" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/vKFN63C8GAflZB1YH2fV0w"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.hulu.com/embed/vKFN63C8GAflZB1YH2fV0w" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true"  width="430" height="248"></embed></object><br />
<br />
So good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/28/shatner-takes-on-sarah-palins-parting-poem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rasmussen: Obama &amp; Romney Tied At 45%?</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/20/rasmussen-obama-romney-tied-at-45/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/20/rasmussen-obama-romney-tied-at-45/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Honestly, I&#8217;ve been less and less inclined to believe Rasmussen&#8217;s number over the past few months since they&#8217;ve shown extremely high negatives for Obama when no other polls were showing the same.
And now we have Obama tied with Romney for 2012 after the President has made virtually no big missteps?
Hmmm&#8230;
Not only that, Obama only bests [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.daylife.com/photo/01WWcIbfRb9na?q=Obama"><img src="http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/01WWcIbfRb9na/610x.jpg" width="430"></a></p>
<p>Honestly, I&#8217;ve been less and less inclined to believe Rasmussen&#8217;s number over the past few months since they&#8217;ve shown extremely high negatives for Obama when no other polls were showing the same.</p>
<p>And now we have Obama tied with Romney for 2012 after the President has made virtually no big missteps?</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230;</p>
<p>Not only that, Obama only bests Sarah Palin by 6%, in a 48% to 42% race?</p>
<p>Come on&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://donklephant.com/2009/07/20/obamas-approval-slips-to-62-in-q2/">Here are some more suspect numbers&#8230;</a><br />
<blockquote>When Romney is the Republican nominee, he beats Obama among unaffiliated voters 48% to 41%. But when Palin is the GOP candidate, unaffiliated voters prefer Obama by a 47% to 41% margin.</p>
<p>Men prefer the Republican over Obama whether itâ€™s Romney or Palin, while women like the president better in both match-ups. Palin continues to fare more poorly among women than her male rivals. </p></blockquote>
<p>Obama is only pulling 41% of Indys when pitted against Romney? And Palin pulls 41%?</p>
<p>Sure, Independents are wary of Obama right now, but he hasn&#8217;t dropped that far out of favor.</p>
<p>Also, Independents fear Palin like the plague. There&#8217;s no way they&#8217;ve swung back this much for her after this disastrous last month. Not a chance.</p>
<p>Do know that I&#8217;m more than willing to accept that Obama&#8217;s number have slipped, but not by this much and this fast. No way, no how.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/20/rasmussen-obama-romney-tied-at-45/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gallup: Romney Leads Early 2012 Pack</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/17/gallup-romney-leads-early-2012-pack/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/17/gallup-romney-leads-early-2012-pack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But Palin is still close behind???


Not only that, Palin has the most favorable numbers among Republicans and Republican leaning Independents&#8230;


Genuinely, I don&#8217;t get Republican&#8217;s fascination with Palin. Especially after her implosion a couple weeks ago, which was before this poll was conducted.
Long story short, the GOP better hope she doesn&#8217;t run. Because if she does [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/121715/Romney-Edges-Palin-Huckabee-Early-2012-GOP-Test.aspx">But Palin is still close behind???</a></p>
<p><img src="http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/lhqxx4xsre2whknrhtq1ng.gif" width="430"><br />
<br />
Not only that, Palin has the most favorable numbers among Republicans and Republican leaning Independents&#8230;</p>
<p><img src="http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/4s53p8y4kukamucatz5eba.gif" width="430"><br />
<br />
Genuinely, I don&#8217;t get Republican&#8217;s fascination with Palin. Especially after her implosion a couple weeks ago, which was before this poll was conducted.</p>
<p>Long story short, the GOP better hope she doesn&#8217;t run. Because if she does it seems like she has a genuine chance at capturing the nomination. But there&#8217;s no way moderates and independents will make her the POTUS. Not a chance in hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/17/gallup-romney-leads-early-2012-pack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin Says She&#8217;ll Support Democrats?</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/12/palin-says-shell-support-democrats/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/12/palin-says-shell-support-democrats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
While I have my doubts about this latest revelation, the obvious question remains: what Democrat would want her support? Especially since many Republicans aren&#8217;t too keen on being linked to her either.
I mean&#8230;really?
From Washington Times:
The former Republican vice-presidential nominee and heroine to much of the GOP&#8217;s base said in an interview she views the electorate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.daylife.com/photo/0cbp6u0el82s0?q=sarah+palin"><img src="http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0cbp6u0el82s0/610x.jpg" width="430"></a></p>
<p>While I have my doubts about this latest revelation, the obvious question remains: what Democrat would want her support? Especially since many Republicans aren&#8217;t too keen on being linked to her either.</p>
<p>I mean&#8230;really?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jul/12/palin-stump-conservative-democrats/">From Washington Times</a>:<br />
<blockquote>The former Republican vice-presidential nominee and heroine to much of the GOP&#8217;s base said in an interview she views the electorate as embattled and fatigued by nonstop partisanship, and she is eager to campaign for Republicans, independents and even Democrats who share her values on limited government, strong defense and &#8220;energy independence.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I will go around the country on behalf of candidates who believe in the right things, regardless of their party label or affiliation,&#8221; she said over lunch in her downtown office, 40 miles from her now-famous hometown of Wasilla â€” population 7,000 â€” where she began her political career.</p>
<p>&#8220;People are so tired of the partisan stuff â€” even my own son is not a Republican,&#8221; said Mrs. Palin, who stunned the political world earlier this month with her decision to step down as governor July 26 with 18 months left in her term. </p></blockquote>
<p>Does she seriously think she has that much pull with Americans? Sure, the base Republicans love her, but that&#8217;s 20% of the electorate. Everybody else is scared that somehow, someway she&#8217;ll find her way into Congress or (gulp) the Oval Office.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know, it just seems like she has a very inflated sense of self and doesn&#8217;t really appreciate that her fame is not about her ideas and is instead all about the novelty of a historic VP pick that McCain made because he was desperate.</p>
<p>More as it develops&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/12/palin-says-shell-support-democrats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin Spins Resignation Via Twitter&#8230;Badly</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/11/palin-spins-resignation-via-twitterbadly/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/11/palin-spins-resignation-via-twitterbadly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Well, I think we all figured it would happen, but I didn&#8217;t think it would be this incoherent.
Yes, politicians are interested in winning and sometimes they can&#8217;t deliver on their entire agendas. I&#8217;m sure Palin hasn&#8217;t fulfilled 100% of her promises in her career. What&#8217;s new?
But to the broader point about what Palin calls &#8220;Professional [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://img.skitch.com/20090711-qwsdn4b1r2fw5mku41cybg3e7r.jpg" class="alignnone" width="430" /></p>
<p>Well, I think we all figured <a href="http://twitter.com/AKGovSarahPalin/status/2584648914">it would happen</a>, but I didn&#8217;t think it would be this incoherent.</p>
<p>Yes, politicians are interested in winning and sometimes they can&#8217;t deliver on their entire agendas. I&#8217;m sure Palin hasn&#8217;t fulfilled 100% of her promises in her career. What&#8217;s new?</p>
<p>But to the broader point about what Palin calls &#8220;Professional Politicians&#8221; &#8230;let&#8217;s take a quick look at Palin&#8217;s 17 year political career and all the titles she has had.	</p>
<li><b>1992 &#8211; 1996:</b> Palin serves two terms on the Wasilla City Council.</li>
<p></p>
<li><b>1996 &#8211; 2002:</b> Palin serves two terms as Wasilla&#8217;s mayor, the most allowed by term limit laws.</li>
<p></p>
<li><b>2002:</b> Palin runs for and loses the GOP nomination for lieutenant governor.</li>
<p></p>
<li><b>2002:</b> Gov. Frank Murkowski names Palin as chairwoman of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission.</li>
<p></p>
<li><b>2006:</b> Palin becomes Alaska governor.</li>
<p></p>
<li><b>2008:</b> John McCain asks Palin to be his running mate. When asked about the conversation by <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqXDbAwvBhY">Charlie Gibson</a>, she says she didn&#8217;t hesitate at all when McCain offered.</li>
<p>Hmm&#8230;seems like Sarah Palin has been pretty interested in titles and moving up the ladder for the better part of the past two decades. Not only that, she has run up against term limits too. So she held certain titles for as long as she could. </p>
<p>Basically, if she&#8217;s not a &#8220;Professional Politician,&#8221; well, I&#8217;m not a blogger.</p>
<p>Not only that, and this is to the broader point she&#8217;s making&#8230;does she genuinely not understand that the more powerful the office and the longer you&#8217;re able to hold it, the more chances you have to actually get things done?</p>
<p><i><a href="http://trueslant.com/justingardner/2009/07/11/palin-spins-resignation-via-twitter/">Cross-posted at True/Slant</a></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/11/palin-spins-resignation-via-twitterbadly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin Top Pick Among National Security Republicans?</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/09/palin-top-pick-among-national-security-republicans/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/09/palin-top-pick-among-national-security-republicans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This one&#8217;s a puzzler.
The potential 2012 candidate who has the least foreign policy knowledge since George W. Bush is the #1 choice for GOPers when it comes to keep us safe?
More at True/Slant.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/02YCcqB1zB9ZN/610x.jpg" width="430" /></p>
<p>This one&#8217;s a puzzler.</p>
<p>The potential 2012 candidate who has the least foreign policy knowledge since George W. Bush is the #1 choice for GOPers when it comes to keep us safe?</p>
<p><a href="http://trueslant.com/justingardner/2009/07/09/palin-top-pick-among-national-security-republicans/">More at True/Slant</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/09/palin-top-pick-among-national-security-republicans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin Has No One But Herself to Blame for Criticisms</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/07/palin-has-no-one-but-herself-to-blame-for-criticisms/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/07/palin-has-no-one-but-herself-to-blame-for-criticisms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Stewart Carl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Years from now, I wonder how weâ€™ll remember Sarah Palin. Politicians are an odd lot to begin with. But, even in that club, Palin is unique in her peculiarities. How can any office holder suddenly resign and then be surprised and offended when people try to uncover some hidden scandal? Hidden (or very public) scandal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://static.open.salon.com/files/sarah_palin-mean_girl1220555300.jpg" alt="null" width="435"/></p>
<p>Years from now, I wonder how weâ€™ll remember Sarah Palin. Politicians are an odd lot to begin with. But, even in that club, Palin is unique in her peculiarities. How can any office holder suddenly resign and then <a href=http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/07/palin-blasts-critics-resignation-announcement/>be surprised and offended</a> when people try to uncover some hidden scandal? Hidden (or very public) scandal is by far the leading cause of office holder resignation!</p>
<p>Palin is still being coy about whether she is planning a 2012 run at the presidency. To me, this reservation is ridiculous. There are only two passable reasons for her not to finish her term as governor. 1) She is 100% done with politics. 2) She wants a head start on getting her partyâ€™s nomination. As for 1, if sheâ€™s done, she should succinctly say so, leaving no room for wiggling. If sheâ€™s running for higher office, she should also say so â€“ forget the typical politician habit of denying a presidential run until the fifteenth visit to Iowa. You canâ€™t just give up your governorâ€™s seat and not admit to your future plans. â€œErraticâ€ is not a quality Americans look for in a president.</p>
<p>Palin has certainly been the recipient of some nasty, petty attacks in the past. But the criticism coming out after her resignation is not some smear campaign by her critics. Itâ€™s the inevitable result of her odd decision and the rambling, unfocused explanation she tried to give. Palin may want to play the victim here, but, this time, she has no one to blame but herself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/07/palin-has-no-one-but-herself-to-blame-for-criticisms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin Not Under Investigation By FBI</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/05/palin-not-under-investigation-by-fbi/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/05/palin-not-under-investigation-by-fbi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 05:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
There&#8217;s been some speculation on this blog and elsewhere that a potential reason for Palin stepping down was a federal probe into her time as Wasilla&#8217;s mayor because of misuse of building materials from a city project.
Well, the L.A. Times contacted the FBI, and there doesn&#8217;t seem to be anything to it&#8230;
A day after Alaska [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/02Qa8Dlgiec4o/610x.jpg" width="430"></p>
<p>There&#8217;s been some speculation <a href="http://donklephant.com/2009/07/04/did-palin-resign-because-of-wasilla-building-scandal/">on this blog</a> and elsewhere that a potential reason for Palin stepping down was a federal probe into her time as Wasilla&#8217;s mayor because of misuse of building materials from a city project.</p>
<p>Well, the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-palin5-2009jul05,0,7018263.story">L.A. Times contacted the FBI</a>, and there doesn&#8217;t seem to be anything to it&#8230;<br />
<blockquote>A day after Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin resigned, a federal official in her home state dismissed one potential explanation for her sudden and unexpected resignation: a rumored FBI investigation into the former Wasilla mayor on public corruption charges.</p>
<p>Despite rumors of a looming controversy after the Republican governor&#8217;s surprise announcement Friday that she would leave office this month, some of them published in the blogosphere, the FBI&#8217;s Alaska spokesman said the bureau had no investigation into Palin for her activities as governor, as mayor or in any other capacity.</p>
<p>&#8220;There is absolutely no truth to those rumors that we&#8217;re investigating her or getting ready to indict her,&#8221; Special Agent Eric Gonzalez said in a phone interview Saturday. &#8220;It&#8217;s just not true.&#8221; He added that there was &#8220;no wiggle room&#8221; in his comments for any kind of inquiry.</p></blockquote>
<p>So that&#8217;s essentially put to bed.</p>
<p>Still, the question remains&#8230;why&#8217;d she resign?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll find out soon enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/05/palin-not-under-investigation-by-fbi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Palin Resign Because Of Wasilla Building Scandal?</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/04/did-palin-resign-because-of-wasilla-building-scandal/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/04/did-palin-resign-because-of-wasilla-building-scandal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 06:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Church</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Editor&#8217;s Update: The L.A. Times talked to the FBI and they aren&#8217;t investigating Palin. So the following is moot.)
Sarah Palinâ€™s sudden resignation as Alaskaâ€™s governor may be the resultÂ of a soon to break scandal involving the building of a sports complex while she was Mayor of Wasilla.
It is rumored that federal indictments are pending involving [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(<b>Editor&#8217;s Update</b>: <a href="http://trueslant.com/justingardner/2009/07/05/221/">The L.A. Times talked to the FBI</a> and they aren&#8217;t investigating Palin. So the following is moot.)</p>
<p>Sarah Palinâ€™s sudden resignation as Alaskaâ€™s governor may be the resultÂ of a soon to break <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/28190/sarah-palin-embezzlement-scandal/"><strong><span style="color: #d37e04;">scandal</span></strong></a> involving the building of a sports complex while she was Mayor of Wasilla.</p>
<p>It is rumored that federal indictments are pending involving construction projects in Wasilla dating back to 2002. The indictments may involve corruption and embezzlement.</p>
<p>Spenard Building Supplies (SBS) was awarded the $13 million contract that created a long-term debt obligation for Wasilla. SBS is the largest building supply company in Alaska.</p>
<p>At the same time, the Palins built a 3,500 sq. ft., two-story home on the shores of Lake Lucille. Todd Palin said that he built the home with the help of â€œbuddies.â€ It is reported that the material used for the construction of the home appears to be the same as that used in the Wasilla Sports Complex, including the windows and the wood. SBS supplied the material for the Palin home.</p>
<p>SBS <a href="http://a11news.com/2125/sarah-palin-embezzlement-scandal/"><strong><span style="color: #d37e04;">filed</span></strong></a> a contractorâ€™s lien on the property for labor and materials, stating that the Palin home and sports complex had the â€œsame windows, same wood, same products.â€</p>
<p>That leads to speculation that excess material from the sports complex was transferred from SBS to the Palin home in a quid pro quo arrangement.</p>
<p>At the time of the Palin house building, Palin blocked a new requirement involving the <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/03/palin-hockey-arena-scandal/"><strong><span style="color: #d37e04;">public filing</span></strong></a> of building permits in Wasilla. This act successfully keptÂ many of the details of the Palin home secret until now.</p>
<p>SBS is a major Palin campaign contributor and sponsor of Todd Palinâ€™s snow machine racing.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-8142" href="http://donklephant.com/2009/07/04/did-palin-resign-because-of-wasilla-building-scandal/revisit-sarah%e2%80%a6decent-speech-but-a-big-strategic-mistake/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-8142" src="http://foolocracy.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/palin-house-new.jpg" alt="palin-house-new" width="280" height="420" /></a>Palinâ€™s resignation may be an attempt to avert a major political scandal, but it is unlikely that the feds will back off because she is now an ex-governor. An August Vanity Fair article is said to have riled the thin-skinned Palin as well. Coupled with an ongoing presence of negative media coverage, Palin may have <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-07-03/did-a-scandal-sink-the-uss-palin/?cid=hp:mainpromo2"><strong><span style="color: #d37e04;">decided</span></strong></a> she has had it with politics. There are reports that she is telling her political backers they are free to select another candidate for 2012.</p>
<p>Palin <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/03/AR2009070301738.html" target="_blank"><strong><span style="color: #d37e04;">said</span></strong></a> that she is tired of the â€œsuperficial, wasteful political blood sport.â€</p>
<p>By resigning, Palin has probably ended her future political career. Quitting is not usually associated with leadership. However, massive legal bills threaten to engulf her as she fights a possible future indictiment. She has already had to fend off 15 state investigations that have led to half a million in legal fees. By quitting, Palin has the opportunity to make considerable money through a book, speaking tours or a news show.</p>
<p>(from <a href="http://foolocracy.com" target="_blank">Foolocracy.com</a>)</p>
<p><b>Note from Justin</b>:<br />
I have more on this over at <a href="http://trueslant.com/justingardner/2009/07/04/did-wasilla-building-scandal-bring-palin-down/">True/Slant</a>, including a couple looks at the Wasilla Sports Complex and a closer shot of Palin&#8217;s house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/04/did-palin-resign-because-of-wasilla-building-scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Andrea Mitchell Claims Palin Is Out Of Politics</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/03/andrea-mitchell-claims-palin-is-out-of-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/03/andrea-mitchell-claims-palin-is-out-of-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If that&#8217;s true, her announcement today makes a lot more sense.
Here&#8217;s the story from MSNBC:


And, if true, she&#8217;d be doing the GOP a huge favor by not being a focal point in the coming years.
More as it develops&#8230;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that&#8217;s true, her announcement today makes a lot more sense.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the story from MSNBC:</p>
<div><iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/31727358#31727358" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></div>
<p>
And, if true, she&#8217;d be doing the GOP a huge favor by not being a focal point in the coming years.</p>
<p>More as it develops&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/03/andrea-mitchell-claims-palin-is-out-of-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin&#8217;s Resignation Speech, Video &amp; Text</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/03/sarah-palins-resignation-speech-video-text/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/03/sarah-palins-resignation-speech-video-text/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, a portion of the video. I can&#8217;t find the entire thing yet, but when I do I&#8217;ll just swap it out.


Did you catch that? She&#8217;s resigning because she doesn&#8217;t want to be a lame duck Governor and waste taxpayer money.
Well, I do know one thing that&#8217;s lame&#8230;.
In any event, here&#8217;s the text of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, a portion of the video. I can&#8217;t find the entire thing yet, but when I do I&#8217;ll just swap it out.</p>
<div><iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/31727178#31727178" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></div>
<p>
Did you catch that? She&#8217;s resigning because she doesn&#8217;t want to be a lame duck Governor and waste taxpayer money.</p>
<p>Well, I do know one thing that&#8217;s lame&#8230;.</p>
<p>In any event, here&#8217;s <a href="http://www.gov.state.ak.us/exec-column.php">the text of the speech</a>&#8230;</p>
<p>#####</p>
<p>Hi Alaska, I appreciate speaking directly TO you, the people I serve, as your Governor.</p>
<p>People who know me know that besides faith and family, nothing&#8217;s more important to me than our beloved Alaska. Serving her people is the greatest honor I could imagine.</p>
<p>I want Alaskans to grasp what can be in store for our state. We were purchased as a territory because a member of President Abe Lincoln&#8217;s cabinet, William Seward, providentially saw in this great land, vast riches, beauty, strategic placement on the globe, and opportunity. He boldly looked &#8220;North to the Future&#8221;. But he endured such ridicule and mocking for his vision for Alaska, remember the adversaries scoffed, calling this &#8220;Seward&#8217;s Folly&#8221;. Seward withstood such disdain as he chose the uncomfortable, unconventional, but RIGHT path to secure Alaska, so Alaska could help secure the United States.</p>
<p><span id="more-15450"></span><br />
People who know me know that besides faith and family, nothing&#8217;s more important to me than our beloved Alaska.</p>
<p>Alaska&#8217;s mission &#8211; to contribute to America. We&#8217;re strategic IN the world as the air crossroads OF the world, as a gatekeeper of the continent. Bold visionaries knew this &#8211; Alaska would be part of America&#8217;s great destiny.</p>
<p>Our destiny to be reached by responsibly developing our natural resources. This land, blessed with clean air, water, wildlife, minerals, AND oil and gas. It&#8217;s energy! God gave us energy.</p>
<p>So to serve the state is a humbling responsibility, because I know in my soul that Alaska is of such import, for America&#8217;s security, in our very volatile world. And you know me by now, I promised even four years ago to show MY independence&#8230; no more conventional &#8220;politics as usual&#8221;.</p>
<p>And we are doing well! My administration&#8217;s accomplishments speak for themselves. We work tirelessly for Alaskans.</p>
<p>We aggressively and responsibly develop our resources because they were created to be used to better our world&#8230; to HELP people&#8230; and we protect the environment and Alaskans (the resource owners) foremost with our policies.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s some of the things we&#8217;ve done:</p>
<p>We created a petroleum integrity office to oversee safe development. We held the line FOR Alaskans on Point Thomson &#8211; and finally for the first time in decades &#8211; they&#8217;re drilling for oil and gas.</p>
<p>We have AGIA, the gasline project &#8211; a massive bi-partisan victory (the vote was 58 to 1!) &#8211; also succeeding as intended &#8211; protecting Alaskans as our clean natural gas will flow to energize us, and America, through a competitive, pro-private sector project. This is the largest private sector energy project, ever. THIS is energy independence.</p>
<p>And ACES &#8211; another bipartisan effort &#8211; is working as intended and industry is publicly acknowledging its success. Our new oil and gas &#8220;clear and equitable formula&#8221; is so Alaskans will no longer be taken advantage of. ACES incentivizes NEW exploration and development and JOBS that were previously not going to happen with a monopolized North Slope oil basin.</p>
<p>We cleaned up previously accepted unethical actions; we ushered in bi-partisan Ethics Reform.</p>
<p>We also slowed the rate of government growth, we worked with the Legislature to save billions of dollars for the future, and I made no lobbyist friends with my hundreds of millions of dollars in budget vetoes&#8230; but living beyond our means today is irresponsible for tomorrow.</p>
<p>We took government out of the dairy business and put it back into private-sector hands &#8211; where it should be.</p>
<p>We provided unprecedented support for education initiatives, and with the right leadership, finally filled long-vacant public safety positions. We built a sub-Cabinet on Climate Change and took heat from Outside special interests for our biologically-sound wildlife management for abundance.</p>
<p>We broke ground on the new prison.</p>
<p>And we made common sense conservative choices to eliminate personal luxuries like the jet, the chef, the junkets&#8230; the entourage.</p>
<p>And the Lt. Governor and I said &#8220;no&#8221; to our pay raises. So much success in this first term &#8211; and with this success I am proud to take credit&#8230; for hiring the right people! Our goal was to achieve a gasline project, more fair oil and gas valuation, and ethics reform in four years. We did it in two. It&#8217;s because of the people&#8230; good public servants surrounding the Governor&#8217;s office, with servants&#8217; hearts and astounding work ethic&#8230; THEY are Alaska&#8217;s success!</p>
<p>We are doing well! I wish you&#8217;d hear MORE from the media of your state&#8217;s progress and how we tackle Outside interests &#8211; daily &#8211; SPECIAL interests that would stymie our state. Even those debt-ridden stimulus dollars that would force the heavy hand of federal government into our communities with an &#8220;all-knowing attitude&#8221; &#8211; I have taken the slings and arrows with that unpopular move to veto because I know being right is better than being popular. Some of those dollars would harm Alaska and harm America &#8211; I resisted those dollars because of the obscene national debt we&#8217;re forcing our children to pay, because of today&#8217;s Big Government spending; it&#8217;s immoral and doesn&#8217;t even make economic sense!</p>
<p>Another accomplishment &#8211; our Law Department protected states&#8217; rights &#8211; TWO huge U.S. Supreme Court reversals came down against that liberal Ninth Circuit, deciding in OUR state&#8217;s favor over the last two weeks. We&#8217;re protectors of our Constitution &#8211; federalists protect states&#8217; rights as mandated in 10th amendment.</p>
<p>But you don&#8217;t hear much of the good stuff in the press anymore, do you?</p>
<p>Some say things changed for me on August 29th last year &#8211; the day John McCain tapped me to be his running-mate &#8211; I say others changed.</p>
<p>Let me speak to that for a minute.</p>
<p>Political operatives descended on Alaska last August, digging for dirt. The ethics law I championed became their weapon of choice. Over the past nine months I&#8217;ve been accused of all sorts of frivolous ethics violations &#8211; such as holding a fish in a photograph, wearing a jacket with a logo on it, and answering reporters&#8217; questions.</p>
<p>Every one &#8211; all 15 of the ethics complaints have been dismissed. We&#8217;ve won! But it hasn&#8217;t been cheap &#8211; the State has wasted THOUSANDS of hours of YOUR time and shelled out some two million of YOUR dollars to respond to &#8220;opposition research&#8221; &#8211; that&#8217;s money NOT going to fund teachers or troopers &#8211; or safer roads. And this political absurdity, the &#8220;politics of personal destruction&#8221; &#8230; Todd and I are looking at more than half a million dollars in legal bills in order to set the record straight. And what about the people who offer up these silly accusations? It doesn&#8217;t cost them a dime so they&#8217;re not going to stop draining public resources &#8211; spending other peoples&#8217; money in their game.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty insane &#8211; my staff and I spend most of our day dealing with THIS instead of progressing our state now. I know I promised no more &#8220;politics as usual,&#8221; but THIS isn&#8217;t what anyone had in mind for ALASKA.</p>
<p>If I have learned one thing: LIFE is about choices!</p>
<p>And one chooses how to react to circumstances. You can choose to engage in things that tear down, or build up. I choose to work very hard on a path for fruitfulness and productivity. I choose NOT to tear down and waste precious time; but to build UP this state and our country, and her industrious, generous, patriotic, free people!</p>
<p>Life is too short to compromise time and resources&#8230; it may be tempting and more comfortable to just keep your head down, plod along, and appease those who demand: &#8220;Sit down and shut up&#8221;, but that&#8217;s the worthless, easy path; that&#8217;s a quitter&#8217;s way out. And a problem in our country today is apathy. It would be apathetic to just hunker down and &#8220;go with the flow&#8221;.</p>
<p>Nah, only dead fish &#8220;go with the flow&#8221;.</p>
<p>No. Productive, fulfilled people determine where to put their efforts, choosing to wisely utilize precious time&#8230; to BUILD UP.</p>
<p>And there is such a need to BUILD up and FIGHT for our state and our country. I choose to FIGHT for it! And I&#8217;ll work hard for others who still believe in free enterprise and smaller government; strong national security for our country and support for our troops; energy independence; and for those who will protect freedom and equality and LIFE&#8230; I&#8217;ll work for and campaign for those PROUD to be American, and those who are INSPIRED by our ideals and won&#8217;t deride them.</p>
<p>I WILL support others who seek to serve, in or out of office, for the RIGHT reasons, and I don&#8217;t care what party they&#8217;re in or no party at all. Inside Alaska &#8211; or Outside Alaska.</p>
<p>But I won&#8217;t do it from the Governor&#8217;s desk.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never believed that I, nor anyone else, needs a title to do this &#8211; to make a difference&#8230; to HELP people. So I choose, for my State and my family, more &#8220;freedom&#8221; to progress, all the way around&#8230; so that Alaska may progress&#8230; I will not seek re-election as Governor.</p>
<p>And so as I thought about this announcement that I wouldn&#8217;t run for re-election and what it means for Alaska, I thought about how much fun some governors have as lame ducks&#8230; travel around the state, to the Lower 48 (maybe), overseas on international trade &#8211; as so many politicians do. And then I thought &#8211; that&#8217;s what&#8217;s wrong &#8211; many just accept that lame duck status, hit the road, draw the paycheck, and &#8220;milk it&#8221;. I&#8217;m not putting Alaska through that &#8211; I promised efficiencies and effectiveness! ? That&#8217;s not how I am wired. I am not wired to operate under the same old &#8220;politics as usual.&#8221; I promised that four years ago &#8211; and I meant it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not what is best for Alaska.</p>
<p>I am determined to take the right path for Alaska even though it is unconventional and not so comfortable.</p>
<p>With this announcement that I am not seeking re-election&#8230; I&#8217;ve determined it&#8217;s best to transfer the authority of governor to Lieutenant Governor Parnell; and I am willing to do so, so that this administration &#8211; with its positive agenda, its accomplishments, and its successful road to an incredible future &#8211; can continue without interruption and with great administrative and legislative success.</p>
<p>My choice is to take a stand and effect change &#8211; not hit our heads against the wall and watch valuable state time and money, millions of your dollars, go down the drain in this new environment. Rather, we know we can effect positive change outside government at this moment in time, on another scale, and actually make a difference for our priorities &#8211; and so we will, for Alaskans and for Americans.</p>
<p>Let me go back to a comfortable analogy for me &#8211; sports&#8230; basketball. I use it because you&#8217;re naÃ¯ve if you don&#8217;t see the national full-court press picking away right now: A good point guard drives through a full court press, protecting the ball, keeping her eye on the basket&#8230; and she knows exactly when to pass the ball so that the team can WIN. And I&#8217;m doing that &#8211; keeping our eye on the ball that represents sound priorities &#8211; smaller government, energy independence, national security, freedom! And I know when it&#8217;s time to pass the ball &#8211; for victory.</p>
<p>I have given my reasons candidly and truthfully&#8230; and my last day won&#8217;t be for another few weeks so the transition will be very smooth. In fact, we will look to swear Sean in &#8211; in Fairbanks at the conclusion of our Governor&#8217;s picnics.</p>
<p>I do not want to disappoint anyone with my decision; all I can ask is that you TRUST me with this decision &#8211; but it&#8217;s no more &#8220;politics as usual&#8221;.</p>
<p>Some Alaskans don&#8217;t mind wasting public dollars and state time. I do. I cannot stand here as your Governor and allow millions upon millions of our dollars go to waste just so I can hold the title of Governor. And my children won&#8217;t allow it either. ? Some will question the timing. ? Let&#8217;s just say, this decision has been in the works for awhile&#8230;</p>
<p>In fact, this decision comes after much consideration, and finally polling the most important people in my life &#8211; my children (where the count was unanimous&#8230; well, in response to asking: &#8220;Want me to make a positive difference and fight for ALL our children&#8217;s future from OUTSIDE the Governor&#8217;s office?&#8221; It was four &#8220;yes&#8217;s&#8221; and one &#8220;hell yeah!&#8221; The &#8220;hell yeah&#8221; sealed it &#8211; and someday I&#8217;ll talk about the details of that&#8230; I think much of it had to do with the kids seeing their baby brother Trig mocked by some pretty mean-spirited adults recently.) Um, by the way, sure wish folks could ever, ever understand that we ALL could learn so much from someone like Trig &#8211; I know he needs me, but I need him even more&#8230; what a child can offer to set priorities RIGHT &#8211; that time is precious&#8230; the world needs more &#8220;Trigs&#8221;, not fewer.</p>
<p>My decision was also fortified during this most recent trip to Kosovo and Landstuhl, to visit our wounded soldiers overseas, those who sacrifice themselves in war for OUR freedom and security&#8230; we can ALL learn from our selfless Troops&#8230; they&#8217;re bold, they don&#8217;t give up, they take a stand and know that LIFE is short so they choose to NOT waste time. They choose to be productive and to serve something greater than SELF&#8230; and to build up their families, their states, our country. These Troops and their important missions &#8211; those are truly the worthy causes in this world and should be the public priority with time and resources and NOT this local / superficial wasteful political bloodsport.</p>
<p>May we ALL learn from them!</p>
<p>*((Gotta put First Things First))*</p>
<p>First things first: as Governor, I love my job and I love Alaska. It hurts to make this choice but I am doing what&#8217;s best for Alaska. I&#8217;ve explained why&#8230; though I think of the saying on my parents&#8217; refrigerator that says &#8220;Don&#8217;t explain: your friends don&#8217;t need it and your enemies won&#8217;t believe you anyway.&#8221;</p>
<p>But I have given my reasons&#8230; no more &#8220;politics as usual&#8221; and I am taking my fight for what&#8217;s right &#8211; for Alaska &#8211; in a new direction.</p>
<p>Now, despite this, I don&#8217;t want any Alaskan dissuaded from entering politics after seeing this REAL &#8220;climate change&#8221; that began in August&#8230; no, we NEED hardworking, average Americans fighting for what&#8217;s right! And I will support you because we need YOU and YOU can effect change, and I can too on the outside.</p>
<p>We need those who will respect our Constitution where government&#8217;s supposed to serve from the BOTTOM UP, not move toward this TOP DOWN big government take-over&#8230; but rather, will be protectors of individual rights &#8211; who also have enough common sense to acknowledge when conditions have drastically changed and are willing to call an audible and pass the ball when it&#8217;s time so the team can win! And that is what I&#8217;m doing!</p>
<p>Remember Alaska&#8230; America is now, more than ever, looking North to the Future. It&#8217;ll be good. So God bless you, and from me and my family &#8211; to ALL Alaska &#8211; you have my heart.</p>
<p>And we will be in the capable hands of our Lieutenant Governor, Sean Parnell. And Lieutenant General Craig Campbell will assume the role of Lieutenant Governor. And it is my promise to you that I will always be standing by, ready to assist. We have a good, positive agenda for Alaska.</p>
<p>In the words of General MacArthur said, &#8220;We are not retreating. We are advancing in another direction.&#8221;</p>
<p>#####</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/03/sarah-palins-resignation-speech-video-text/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin&#8217;s Resignation Proves She&#8217;s A Lightweight</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/03/palins-resignation-proves-shes-a-lightweight/</link>
		<comments>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/03/palins-resignation-proves-shes-a-lightweight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
If Sarah Palin really does have presidential aspirations, today&#8217;s move was the worst she ever could have made.
I discuss why over at True/Slant.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.daylife.com/photo/0ecP8t7fAD5WE?q=Sarah+Palin"><img alt="" src="http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0ecP8t7fAD5WE/610x.jpg" class="alignnone" width="430" /></a></p>
<p>If Sarah Palin really does have presidential aspirations, today&#8217;s move was the worst she ever could have made.</p>
<p>I discuss why over at <a href="http://trueslant.com/justingardner/2009/07/03/palins-resignation-proves-shes-a-lightweight/">True/Slant</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/03/palins-resignation-proves-shes-a-lightweight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
