“Brownie, You’re Doing A Heck Of A Job”

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Hurricane Katrina

Those were Bush’s words to FEMA head Michael Brown on Friday.

I don’t usually agree with Michelle Malkin, but now she’s calling for Brown’s dismissal, and if his incompetence is as glaring as she’s pointed out, I agree that he should be fired as soon as this disaster relief effort is over.

Some reasons?

- He admitted that he didn’t act more aggressively because as late as last Sunday he expected Katrina to be a “standard hurricane” even though the National Weather Service in New Orleans was already predicting “human suffering incredible by modern standards.”

- He proved himself utterly clueless about the disaster unfolding in New Orleans. He claimed that the federal relief effort was “going relatively well” and that the security situation in New Orleans was “pretty darn good.”

But for me, the kicker to “Brownie’s” seeming incompetence was blaming the victims, as Malkin points out.

- He blamed the flood victims in New Orleans for failing to evacuate on time, even though local authorities failed to make municipal vehicles available to residents who could not drive or did not own their own cars.

It’s becoming increasingly apparent that Brown will be the fall guy in the aftermath of this situation. However, the failures here are not ONE man’s fault.

But who else should be responsible too?

This entry was posted on Sunday, September 4th, 2005 and is filed under Hurricane Katrina. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

5 Responses to ““Brownie, You’re Doing A Heck Of A Job””

  1. cakreiz Says:

    If I were a betting man, I’d wager that Brownie gets a Medal of Freedom ala George Tenet. Bush loves rewarding competence.

  2. Jim Jones Says:

    I really don’t understand it… why would Bush publicly praise someone who so obviously didn’t do his job? It also is stupefying that Bush would have appointed Brown to his position given that Brown had virtually no qualifications for the job. He certainly was not the most qualified candidate and Bush should have stayed with Clinton’s FEMA director.

    Maybe some Bush supporters (those dyed in the wool folks), can explain this because I am at a loss.

  3. Meredith Says:

    And speaking of appointments . . . . Brown had no qualifications? Brown was not the most qualified candidate? Sound familiar?? Yes, let’s go ahead and nominate this potentially brand new member (Roberts) of the Supreme Court for the CHIEF JUSTICE position right out of the gate. AND, so what if it’s a lifetime position . . . .

    If this guy can’t cut it as a Chief Justice, there will be no way to get rid of him. I guess this is just one of my worries come true - Bush won in 2004, and he is going to pack every branch of our government with people, that in one way or another, are not going to be good for this country. Sure, it’s too early to tell whether Roberts will be good, bad or indifferent. However, do we really trust Bush’s judgment on these things anymore? How many more times does he have to screw up before people will admit that he’s a bad president? that this country made a mistake in re-electing him?

  4. Jim Jones Says:

    I think I understand it better… Apparently, Brown’s predecessor Joseph Allbaugh, another Bush appointee was a big fundraiser for GWB. Brown was said predecessors roommate in college. So I guess he was qualified!

  5. Kiu Says:

    Good job.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: