What The Hell Is Wrong With John Gibson?

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Partisan Hacks

Even though he’s always been highly partisan, the Fox News commentator seems to be freely venturing into Coulter territory.

Just read:

“Hang on, Dems. Here come the Pol Pots of your party. And if you were for national security, you are now emphatically not. Or else. Remember the mountain of skulls in Cambodia? It’s the Democrats’ new reality now that the anti-war rabble has tasted blood by taking Lieberman down.�

So this is what passes for genuine political commentary these days? This guy actually gets paid to say this stuff?

Jeezus…

UPDATE:
Oh wait! This was the guy who wrote that ridiculous book “The War On Christmas” and then tried to manufacture a crisis along with O’Reilly to sell the book last year. They failed miserably, but I can’t believe I forgot that.

Haha, yeah, he’s always been a hack.

This entry was posted on Sunday, August 13th, 2006 and is filed under Partisan Hacks. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

11 Responses to “What The Hell Is Wrong With John Gibson?”

  1. Pug Says:

    This is what passes for commentary on Fox News. The guy couldn’t work as a commentator anywhere else. Neither could Tammy Bruce.

    Yeah, those Democrats, they’re such extremists. Not like normal people like John Gibson. These guys have really gone off the deep end with the defeat of Joe Lieberman for some reason.

    Pol Pot? Mountains of skulls? This guy sounds more radical than Ahmadinejad, a name I’m sure he can’t pronounce.

  2. Alan S. Carl Says:

    This is another case of someone reaching for too crazy of a metaphor to make their too-simple point. That seems to be a common practice in American politics and one I seriously doubt is new (it’s just more noticed because communication is so vast these days). People like Gibson not only lack new ideas, they lack new ways to express them. That’s why they call it an echo chamber, I guess.

  3. Jimmy the Dhimmi Says:

    Do you at least see that he is referring to the Cambodian holocaust that followed after premature American withdrawal from the Vietnam war? He is not saying Lamont is a Pol pot, rather, Iraq will become another “killing-field” where millions could be slaughtered if Iraq is abandoned prematurely.

    Gibson is a douchebag, however.

  4. Alan S. Carl Says:

    Jimmy,

    You may be right but I actually took the meaning to be that the Democrat leftists are the Khmer Rouge, purging their ranks of all intellect and dissent. Perhaps he means both. Hard to tell when I’ve only seen the quote out of context …

    Either way, it’s not exactly the kind of rhetoric that elevates American culture or society.

  5. DosPeros Says:

    Thanks Jimmy no I didn’t realize that and I was wondering what the hell he was talking about…Pol Pot…why not Hitler, Stalin, Bundy, exc…but now it makes much more sense with a little historic perspective and it makes Gibson (while agree he is a duche bag) seem like less of a hack (with this issue) with a bit more knowledge.

  6. DosPeros Says:

    btw, with that reference, that is perfectly legitimate political commentary.

  7. Justin Gardner Says:

    The only context where that would be perfectly legtimate political commentary is if it was preceded by. “Whoever would say the following is a hack trying to score points with Republicans.”

    Pol Pots of your party? Go back and read the quote again people. The meaning is VERY clear.

  8. The Centaur Says:

    The best thing to do is read the entire column for yourself. It’s worth a click over…

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,207666,00.html

  9. BrianOfAtlanta Says:

    It sounded pretty incoherent to me. Looking back at it, I can kind of see Alan’s point. However, at the time of reading I couldn’t make any sense of it.

  10. Donklephant » Blog Archive » Lieberman Sitting Pretty? Says:

    [...] You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your ownsite. [...]

  11. Devil's Advocate Says:

    What’s wrong with John Gibson?

    He is a Major League Asshole and a buffoon to boot. That’s what’s wrong with him. Unfortunately, there is no cure.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: