<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nothing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/nothing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/nothing/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-171447</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/nothing/#comment-171447</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an interesting and deep question to ponder, and something that I know was considered by many people on the &quot;bad bad people, anti-war, left-wing, intellectual, anti-American&quot; side in 2003. It&#039;s something that the administration shows no sign of considering.

I personally think that Iraq will congeal... eventually... into a whole of its prior self, albeit without Saddam and likely without its current government. People can only endure so much violence and pain before giving up. I think a good case-in-point would be the ready surrender of Mogadishu in Somalia. It went without a fight and I would posit that it was partly as a result of many people being tired of a over a decade of anarchy and chaos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting and deep question to ponder, and something that I know was considered by many people on the &#8220;bad bad people, anti-war, left-wing, intellectual, anti-American&#8221; side in 2003. It&#8217;s something that the administration shows no sign of considering.</p>
<p>I personally think that Iraq will congeal&#8230; eventually&#8230; into a whole of its prior self, albeit without Saddam and likely without its current government. People can only endure so much violence and pain before giving up. I think a good case-in-point would be the ready surrender of Mogadishu in Somalia. It went without a fight and I would posit that it was partly as a result of many people being tired of a over a decade of anarchy and chaos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-171367</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 16:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/nothing/#comment-171367</guid>
		<description>Insert the words &quot;with or&quot; into Saddam&#039;s statement, and he would have been closer to the mark.

The real trouble isn&#039;t Saddam or his absence, it&#039;s that too many other nations, for their own reasons, don&#039;t want the &lt;i&gt;de facto&lt;/i&gt; breakup of Iraq that we&#039;re witnessing now to become a formal partitioning. Turkey doesn&#039;t want a Kurdistan next door. Nearby Arab countries don&#039;t want a flood of Sunni refugees they&#039;re afraid they&#039;ll get if the Sunni Iraqis are cut off from the oil wealth that lies mainly in the other parts of Iraq. And of course a formal breakup would put paid to the Bush administration&#039;s notion, and America&#039;s hope, that the three peoples could somehow peacefully coexist and build a democracy together.

The Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds were brought together many years ago in a shotgun wedding of sorts. Now that the shotgun is no longer pointed at them, they clearly want a divorce, but have found TPTB unwilling to process their divorce filing and officially dissolve the marriage. So, like it or not, they&#039;re stuck with each other, and will keep fighting at least unless and until they are allowed to become unstuck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insert the words &#8220;with or&#8221; into Saddam&#8217;s statement, and he would have been closer to the mark.</p>
<p>The real trouble isn&#8217;t Saddam or his absence, it&#8217;s that too many other nations, for their own reasons, don&#8217;t want the <i>de facto</i> breakup of Iraq that we&#8217;re witnessing now to become a formal partitioning. Turkey doesn&#8217;t want a Kurdistan next door. Nearby Arab countries don&#8217;t want a flood of Sunni refugees they&#8217;re afraid they&#8217;ll get if the Sunni Iraqis are cut off from the oil wealth that lies mainly in the other parts of Iraq. And of course a formal breakup would put paid to the Bush administration&#8217;s notion, and America&#8217;s hope, that the three peoples could somehow peacefully coexist and build a democracy together.</p>
<p>The Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds were brought together many years ago in a shotgun wedding of sorts. Now that the shotgun is no longer pointed at them, they clearly want a divorce, but have found TPTB unwilling to process their divorce filing and officially dissolve the marriage. So, like it or not, they&#8217;re stuck with each other, and will keep fighting at least unless and until they are allowed to become unstuck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel DiRito</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-171366</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel DiRito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 16:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/nothing/#comment-171366</guid>
		<description>See a sarcastic visual of George Bush playing a round of ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã…â€œHangmanÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚?ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦here:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thoughttheater.com/2006/12/george_plays_hangman.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.thoughttheater.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See a sarcastic visual of George Bush playing a round of ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã…â€œHangmanÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚?ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thoughttheater.com/2006/12/george_plays_hangman.php" >http://www.thoughttheater.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

