Hillary Camp’s Woefully Bad Spin For Next Tuesday

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in 2008 Election, Barack, Hillary, Ohio, Texas

Me thinks she thinks we be dumb…

Senator Obama has campaigned hard in these states. He has spent time meeting editorial boards, courting endorsers, holding rallies, and - of course - making speeches.

If he cannot win all of these states with all this effort, there’s a problem.

Should Senator Obama fail to score decisive victories with all of the resources and effort he is bringing to bear, the message will be clear:

Democrats, the majority of whom have favored Hillary in the primary contests held to date, have their doubts about Senator Obama and are having second thoughts about him as a prospective standard-bearer.

As anybody who follows this campaign knows, he has made up considerable ground since Super Tuesday in Ohio and Texas. Before then he was trailing by 15 points or more in either state. SHE was favored in the big states, not him.

I also like how the memo also notes that he has - of course - made speeches. Because remember, wink wink, that’s all he does…well, except for meeting editorial boards, courting endorsers and holding rallies. But that’s it, he doesn’t do anything else.

Ezra Klein weighs in…

Who is this aimed at? Political reporters know it’s dumb. Political junkies know it’s dumb. Superdelegates aren’t going to be taken in by it. What’s the target audience? And why aren’t they making better arguments?

Ben Smith shares too…

Certainly, big Clinton wins in Ohio and Texas would signal some inability of Obama to close the deal. But the bar for Clinton is probably a bit higher than going one for four.

And I continue to sit back and shake my head. They can’t be this bad at this, can they?

This entry was posted on Saturday, March 1st, 2008 and is filed under 2008 Election, Barack, Hillary, Ohio, Texas. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “Hillary Camp’s Woefully Bad Spin For Next Tuesday”

  1. redhorse Says:

    Justin - everytime I think, they can’t possibly be this bad, Team Clinton does something to prove, indeed, they are. When the nomination is settled, their ineptitude is what I’ll take away from the Clinton ‘08 campaign.

  2. Bubbles Says:

    Campaigning hard means nothing. Ask Bill Richardson.

  3. Jim S Says:

    “They can’t be this bad at this, can they?”

    Have you watched Howard Wolfson on the tube representing the campaign? While I voted for Obama I’m not some fanatical rah-rah boy either. Yet when I see Wolfson I think “Eeewwww. Slime.”.

  4. Alex T Says:

    Just a quick comment from a politics loving Canadian. Why is no one in the States asking Hillary about Whitewater? That was our girl Hillary. The bad news to me is I don’t think that Americans will stomach the smell of another Clinton presidency. Obama/McCain will run a much more ethical debate and campaign than the pack of Clinton junkyard dogs.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: