Petraeus Recommends Halt in Troop Withdrawal

By Alan Stewart Carl | Related entries in Iraq

General David Petraeus has proven himself to be an astute general, so when he calls for a halt in troop withdrawals from Iraq we should listen closely. Petraeus has called for a 45 day “period of consolidation and evaluation” beginning in July after last year’s troop additions have left. In remarks at a Senate hearing, Petraeus said:

”At the end of that [45 day] period, we will commence a process of assessment to examine the conditions on the ground and, over time, determine when we can make recommendations for further reductions.

“This process will be continuous, with recommendations for further reductions made as conditions permit. This approach does not allow establishment of a set withdrawal timetable. However, it does provide the flexibility those of us on the ground need to preserve the still fragile security gains our troopers have fought so hard a sacrificed so much to achieve…

“Withdrawing too many forces too quickly could jeopardize the progress of the past year.”

What this tells us is that conditions on the ground are still unstable but that the general believes the gains of the last year can be made permanent so long as we don’t exit too quickly. Notice also that Petraeus is concerned with “security” not “democracy” or any other lofty goals. It seems more and more clear that our new measure of “victory” will be “stability.” Question is, will war opponents believe Petraeus’ assessments of the situation or will they continue to advocate timetables unrelated to actual security gains?

It’ll be interesting to see how or if the Democratic presidential contenders react to Petraeus’ remarks.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 8th, 2008 and is filed under Iraq. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “Petraeus Recommends Halt in Troop Withdrawal”

  1. Avinash_Tyagi Says:

    Bull, he just realizes that Bush will not allow the withdrawl, so this will give him the breathing time to push the “conditions” out until after the elections

  2. rob Says:

    Greewald goes through Petraeus’ testimony back to 2003. After seeing how he is usually wrong or just spewing propaganda, why should we continue to listen to him?

  3. TerenceC Says:

    Am I missing something here – or are we still waiting for an answer to the questions of 1 – Why did we ever go there 2 – What are the parameters for victory? 3 – Who has benefitted the most from this action? Why can’t anyone answer those questions honestly and correctly, the is constantly moving. Petraeus is being asked to support, defend, and protect a series of lies and half truths and philosophies…..he’s a good military guy but even Alexander the Great couldn’t do that. Bring on the impeachment hearings – I want the truth this has gone on long enough.

Leave a Reply


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.

Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.

One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.

Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.

Related Posts: