<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s Stock Drops Among White Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/05/30/obamas-stock-drops-among-white-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/30/obamas-stock-drops-among-white-women/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:33:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TerenceC</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/30/obamas-stock-drops-among-white-women/comment-page-1/#comment-408639</link>
		<dc:creator>TerenceC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 11:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5841#comment-408639</guid>
		<description>BW

She deserved to lose - she did it to herself. Arrogance, a sense of entitlement, and a life time of arm twisting to get her &quot;way&quot; (and the subsequent pay-back that behavior brings). That&#039;s why she lost - it has nothing to do with sexism, it has everything to do with stupidity. &quot;Do on to others......&quot; doesn&#039;t just apply to religious communities. And despite what JG says - Obama doesn&#039;t need a large share of the old dried up white women to win - he only needs 40%-45% or so because his demographic is so broad. Don&#039;t be angry at Obama - be angry at Hillary for being so stupid - this thing was hers to lose, and she did it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BW</p>
<p>She deserved to lose &#8211; she did it to herself. Arrogance, a sense of entitlement, and a life time of arm twisting to get her &#8220;way&#8221; (and the subsequent pay-back that behavior brings). That&#8217;s why she lost &#8211; it has nothing to do with sexism, it has everything to do with stupidity. &#8220;Do on to others&#8230;&#8230;&#8221; doesn&#8217;t just apply to religious communities. And despite what JG says &#8211; Obama doesn&#8217;t need a large share of the old dried up white women to win &#8211; he only needs 40%-45% or so because his demographic is so broad. Don&#8217;t be angry at Obama &#8211; be angry at Hillary for being so stupid &#8211; this thing was hers to lose, and she did it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BW</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/30/obamas-stock-drops-among-white-women/comment-page-1/#comment-408599</link>
		<dc:creator>BW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 00:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5841#comment-408599</guid>
		<description>Women who are offended by Barack Obama and his hate preaching friends have seen with their own eyes the kind of hatemonger and sexist that he is. They are not following Clinton&#039;s lead on this, Clinton is expressing what we are all seeing and feeling. I must thank her for giving voice to what we are all seeing. I would suggest that you take this matter seriously. I would even beg you to do so. Anything else is so disrespectful - it is hard to imagine that we were once in the same democratic party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Women who are offended by Barack Obama and his hate preaching friends have seen with their own eyes the kind of hatemonger and sexist that he is. They are not following Clinton&#8217;s lead on this, Clinton is expressing what we are all seeing and feeling. I must thank her for giving voice to what we are all seeing. I would suggest that you take this matter seriously. I would even beg you to do so. Anything else is so disrespectful &#8211; it is hard to imagine that we were once in the same democratic party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
