McCain Wavers on Taxes

By Alan Stewart Carl | Related entries in McCain, Social Security, Taxes

John McCain appears to be wavering on his no tax pledge. This past weekend he admitted that “nothing is off the table” in terms of fixing Social Security, and that includes raising the payroll tax.

McCain said he would obviously prefer not to raise taxes but …

While I tend to think taking tax increases off the table is politically foolish for any politician, McCain needs to be careful here. One of his advantages over Barack Obama is that voters know McCain a lot better and can be more confident about where he stands on major issues. To waver on such a fundamental issue as Social Security payroll taxes really makes me question where his head is at. He already has trouble explaining why he voted against George Bush’s tax relief – now he’ll have to explain this too.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 29th, 2008 and is filed under McCain, Social Security, Taxes. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “McCain Wavers on Taxes”

  1. kranky kritter Says:

    I’m of two minds on this. Agreed that this shows a lack of savvy regarding tactical maneuvers, tax increases being a GOP 3rd rail, but it actually encourgaes me that McCain would attempt, even clumsily, to acknowledge that the nature of the impending SS funding gap is that it will be too vast to bridge via tweaking.

    However, any candidate who suggests that increased payroll taxes NOW make sense for a gap that won’t arrive for another, what 7 to 10 years, better be ready to explain to me how that surplus will actually be set aside for its alleged use. And I’m not talking about a “trust fund” which amounts to no more than a note to the government that says “Uncle sam owes SSA 15 gazillon bananas.”

  2. Donklephant » Blog Archive » WSJ Editorial Board Slams McCain On Taxes Says:

    [...] Alan posted yesterday about McCain wavering on his tax policy, I wondered how long it would take for the fiscal [...]

  3. TomFromMD Says:

    From the SS point of view, there’s nothing wrong with that note, bananas withstanding. The problem (so far as it exists) is the effect on that debt on the dollar and the future taxpayer; i.e. we’re creating a debt for ourselves. But there’s no difference between that debt and any other that the government contracts – it’s no worse than selling bonds. So the real problem (from the viewpoint of the government and future taxpayer) is the amount of debt that we’re accruing. And here, there is a solution: if the taxes go to pay off existing debt, or to offset new obligations that we were going to take anyway, we keep the demands on the future taxpayer from being any worse. The only tricky part is to keep the pigs in Washington from seeing it as a new trough.

Leave a Reply


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.

Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.

One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.

Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.

Related Posts: