Army To Pay $150,000 For Arabic Speakers

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Iraq, Military, Money

We’re paying through the nose now because we didn’t plan ahead back then.

From CS Monitor:

The Army may begin paying a retention bonus of as much as $150,000 to Arabic speaking soldiers in reflection of how critical it has become for the US military to retain native language and cultural know-how in its ranks.

Only one other job in the Army, Special Forces, rates such a super-sized retention bonus. Now, as the military makes a fundamental shift toward rewarding the linguistic expertise it needs the most, it is expanding a program to train and retain native Arabic and other speakers from the same regions in which it is fighting.

Personally, I don’t like to see such a vast disparity in troop pay because I think it has the chance to seriously hurt morale. Sure, retaining these folks is important, but what about those men and women who put themselves in harm’s way every single day? A move like this literally tells them how much less their lives are worth, and that just doesn’t seem like a smart move at this point.

Furthermore, is this the new American way? Trying to buy our way out of a problem?

Considered me unconvinced…


This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 5th, 2008 and is filed under Iraq, Military, Money. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “Army To Pay $150,000 For Arabic Speakers”

  1. Gold Star for Robot Boy Says:

    Or, the Army could’ve kept the 58 Arabic linguists who happen to be gay.
    http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/05/23/america/NA-GEN-US-Military-Gays.php
    Nah. That’s crazy talk.

  2. wj Says:

    To expand on what Gold Star said, just consider it the price you pay to avoid having gays in the military. Obviously the damage to morale from gays is greater than that from the vast differential for linguists. Obviously — even though the troops (as opposed to the generals) don’t seem to think so.

  3. kritter Says:

    I must have missed that pre-9/11 hue and cry from all those folks more far-sighted than the Army, counseling a massive effort to train arabic speakers. Seriously folks, if the choice is between not having arabic speakers and paying market rate, there’s not much to argue about, now is there?

    The anti-gay policy is of course moronic. Though I suspect that with the retention bonuses as high as stated, we’re talking about more than 58 openings.

  4. Rich Horton Says:

    How is this “buying our way out of the problem” exactly? You have an in-demand skill that few have….hmmm….low supply + high demand = high salary. What occupation doesn’t work that way?

    Plus, I’ve never once heard someone in the military complain about the difference in pay for special ops folks. Individuals work their butts off trying to get into those units, and often wash out. Not everyone is cut out for elite units and the troops accept it. Same here…not everyone is going to be able to pick up a difficult to learn language like Arabic…although they are all welcome to try.

    I’m sure the US was paying a premium for Russian speakers in 1947 too. We adjusted and by the late 1980’s we had too many to employ.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: