<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goldman Sachs&#8217; Tax Rate Drops To 1%?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/12/17/goldman-sachs-tax-rate-drops-to-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/12/17/goldman-sachs-tax-rate-drops-to-1/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:08:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rich Horton</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/12/17/goldman-sachs-tax-rate-drops-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-432727</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=12161#comment-432727</guid>
		<description>Actually, I hate to nitpick more, but it isn&#039;t a $5.86 billion NOR a $5.986 billion tax break.  You would have to start the tax based upon this years profit, which is only $2.3 billion total.

I&#039;m not saying that $14 million sounds right either.  But I&#039;m certain we cannot expect them to pay a tax that is twice of their total profits (which as written is what this story says.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I hate to nitpick more, but it isn&#8217;t a $5.86 billion NOR a $5.986 billion tax break.  You would have to start the tax based upon this years profit, which is only $2.3 billion total.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that $14 million sounds right either.  But I&#8217;m certain we cannot expect them to pay a tax that is twice of their total profits (which as written is what this story says.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surabaya Stew</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/12/17/goldman-sachs-tax-rate-drops-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-432412</link>
		<dc:creator>Surabaya Stew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=12161#comment-432412</guid>
		<description>Not to nitpick Justin, but its actually a $5.986 billion tax break. $5.86 billion from $6 billion leaves $140 million (or $0.14 billion), and as you say, GS is only paying $14 million in taxes this year. Otherwise thanks for the info; I have yet to hear of this ongoing nonsense on other sites!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to nitpick Justin, but its actually a $5.986 billion tax break. $5.86 billion from $6 billion leaves $140 million (or $0.14 billion), and as you say, GS is only paying $14 million in taxes this year. Otherwise thanks for the info; I have yet to hear of this ongoing nonsense on other sites!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
