<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Is Wrong With Bill O&#8217;Reilly?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2009/03/24/what-is-wrong-with-bill-oreilly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/03/24/what-is-wrong-with-bill-oreilly/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:56:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Agnostick</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/03/24/what-is-wrong-with-bill-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-438355</link>
		<dc:creator>Agnostick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14145#comment-438355</guid>
		<description>Is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_2IZT4VgDY&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Porter Barry&lt;/a&gt; still on O&#039;Reilly&#039;s leash?

Agnostick
agnostick@excite.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_2IZT4VgDY" rel="nofollow">Porter Barry</a> still on O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s leash?</p>
<p>Agnostick<br />
<a href="mailto:agnostick@excite.com">agnostick@excite.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smooth Jazz</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/03/24/what-is-wrong-with-bill-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-438349</link>
		<dc:creator>Smooth Jazz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14145#comment-438349</guid>
		<description>By the way, anyone who is interested in being simultaneously amused and seriously scared at the same time should check out Glenn Beck at his I&#039;m such a patriot cry fest at Fox News.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0309/Frum_What_the_hell_is_going_on_at_Fox_News.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, anyone who is interested in being simultaneously amused and seriously scared at the same time should check out Glenn Beck at his I&#8217;m such a patriot cry fest at Fox News.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0309/Frum_What_the_hell_is_going_on_at_Fox_News.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0309/Frum_What_the_hell_is_going_on_at_Fox_News.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smooth Jazz</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/03/24/what-is-wrong-with-bill-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-438344</link>
		<dc:creator>Smooth Jazz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14145#comment-438344</guid>
		<description>Wow, where to start?  

Well first I want to say that O&#039;Reilly is a pure partisan hack.  He pretends to be an independent, and even a conservative.  That&#039;s not what he primarily is.  He is primarily a Republican with a TV show, promoting the Republican agenda.  I will grant him that he does diverge with former President Bush on illegal immigration.  Other than that, he&#039;s a shill for the Republican Party.  

That being said, O&#039;Reilly has every right to defend himself as aggressively as possible from the charges being made against him.  If someone said things about me, that they say about him, I would go to the floor and fight as ferociously as possible to defend myself and attack the accusers.

With that also being said, I think that O&#039;Reilly&#039;s segment came across as ham-fisted, delusional and insane for anyone with some intelligence.  I think the Republican Party does rely upon stupid viewers and listeners to sell their message, but if you don&#039;t fall into those categories, then O&#039;Reilly segment was ham-fisted, delusional and insane.  

Despite being ambushed by O&#039;Reilly&#039;s producer, the Terkel woman acquitted herself well.  She said something very reasonable, despite the leading questions she was given, but was nonetheless called &quot;dishonest&quot; by a supposedly disinterested interviewer.  The way O&#039;Reilly goes on to make it into a conspiracy theory with NBC, General Electric and those evil far lefties just made it seem like an episode of the Twilight Zone.  

It all goes back to: is his audience dumb enough to buy it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, where to start?  </p>
<p>Well first I want to say that O&#8217;Reilly is a pure partisan hack.  He pretends to be an independent, and even a conservative.  That&#8217;s not what he primarily is.  He is primarily a Republican with a TV show, promoting the Republican agenda.  I will grant him that he does diverge with former President Bush on illegal immigration.  Other than that, he&#8217;s a shill for the Republican Party.  </p>
<p>That being said, O&#8217;Reilly has every right to defend himself as aggressively as possible from the charges being made against him.  If someone said things about me, that they say about him, I would go to the floor and fight as ferociously as possible to defend myself and attack the accusers.</p>
<p>With that also being said, I think that O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s segment came across as ham-fisted, delusional and insane for anyone with some intelligence.  I think the Republican Party does rely upon stupid viewers and listeners to sell their message, but if you don&#8217;t fall into those categories, then O&#8217;Reilly segment was ham-fisted, delusional and insane.  </p>
<p>Despite being ambushed by O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s producer, the Terkel woman acquitted herself well.  She said something very reasonable, despite the leading questions she was given, but was nonetheless called &#8220;dishonest&#8221; by a supposedly disinterested interviewer.  The way O&#8217;Reilly goes on to make it into a conspiracy theory with NBC, General Electric and those evil far lefties just made it seem like an episode of the Twilight Zone.  </p>
<p>It all goes back to: is his audience dumb enough to buy it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SD3</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/03/24/what-is-wrong-with-bill-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-438343</link>
		<dc:creator>SD3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14145#comment-438343</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;...it is the gotcha-style â€˜journalismâ€™ that he tries to pass off as legitimate.&lt;/em&gt;

Sure, O&#039;Reilly&#039;s a jerk, but so what?  He regularly admits he&#039;s not a journalist, but a pundit, not unlike Limbaugh, Randy Rhoades or Moulitas.

I&#039;ll reserve my outrage for the gangsters who actually claim to be journalists and practice gotcha-style â€˜journalismâ€™.

Anyone remember the army of &#039;journalists&#039; sent to Alaska to run-down every whack-o rumor on Sarah Palin?  Oh wait, I&#039;m sorry that was legit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8230;it is the gotcha-style â€˜journalismâ€™ that he tries to pass off as legitimate.</em></p>
<p>Sure, O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s a jerk, but so what?  He regularly admits he&#8217;s not a journalist, but a pundit, not unlike Limbaugh, Randy Rhoades or Moulitas.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll reserve my outrage for the gangsters who actually claim to be journalists and practice gotcha-style â€˜journalismâ€™.</p>
<p>Anyone remember the army of &#8216;journalists&#8217; sent to Alaska to run-down every whack-o rumor on Sarah Palin?  Oh wait, I&#8217;m sorry that was legit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
