<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judith Miller Is Free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2005/09/30/judith-miller-is-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/09/30/judith-miller-is-free/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:59:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sov</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/09/30/judith-miller-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-58906</link>
		<dc:creator>Sov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 14:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/09/30/judith-miller-is-free/#comment-58906</guid>
		<description>Good job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lonely Federalist</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/09/30/judith-miller-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-2630</link>
		<dc:creator>Lonely Federalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 21:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/09/30/judith-miller-is-free/#comment-2630</guid>
		<description>I thought she could be held in contempt only while the Grand Jury was in session.  Wasn&#039;t it always supposed to be shutting down about now (Sept/Oct timeframe)?  Ergo, she&#039;d be released about now regardless of whether she revealed source or not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought she could be held in contempt only while the Grand Jury was in session.  Wasn&#8217;t it always supposed to be shutting down about now (Sept/Oct timeframe)?  Ergo, she&#8217;d be released about now regardless of whether she revealed source or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawhawk</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/09/30/judith-miller-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-2626</link>
		<dc:creator>lawhawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 19:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/09/30/judith-miller-is-free/#comment-2626</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;As much as she stood up for her right to not speak, I bet she has to be a little bit peeved that Libby only recently decided to give her permission to speak.&lt;/blockquote&gt;That&#039;s not true. Miller said that she got the waiver from her source but considered it to be invalid because she thought it wasn&#039;t given freely. And you mean to tell me that the waiver of confidentiality couldn&#039;t be negotiated in less than three months? I&#039;ve seen multibillion dollar deals negotiated in sooner time than that. 

So what&#039;s changed in three months? Nothing. Something else is going on, the importance of which is still unclear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>As much as she stood up for her right to not speak, I bet she has to be a little bit peeved that Libby only recently decided to give her permission to speak.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s not true. Miller said that she got the waiver from her source but considered it to be invalid because she thought it wasn&#8217;t given freely. And you mean to tell me that the waiver of confidentiality couldn&#8217;t be negotiated in less than three months? I&#8217;ve seen multibillion dollar deals negotiated in sooner time than that. </p>
<p>So what&#8217;s changed in three months? Nothing. Something else is going on, the importance of which is still unclear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
