The Year Of The Independent?
By Justin Gardner | Related entries in General PoliticsSome interesting news out of Texas…
AUSTIN â€â€? Comptroller Carole Keeton Strayhorn ended speculation today by announcing she will run for governor against Gov. Rick Perry as an independent.“It’s time to shake Austin up,” Strayhorn, who is now serving as a Republican officeholder, told reporters today, the filing deadline for the 2006 elections.
“Governor Perry may be doing the best he can, but after five years, we have learned he is not the strong leader we need to put Texas above politics,” she added.
Satirist Kinky Friedman already has announced as an independent candidate for governor.
This is actually one of my predictions for the next couple years. We’ll see more and more politicians running as independents trying to garner centrist votes. I don’t know if it’ll work, but I welcome the effort to try and establish some type of third way in the process.
God knows we need it…
This entry was posted on Tuesday, January 3rd, 2006 and is filed under General Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
January 3rd, 2006 at 3:43 pm
NZ has been through this process in a number of different ways over the years.
Back in the late ’50s, the Hobson electorate (the very northernmost bit) elected one Vernon Cracknell who became a very “profitable” member for the region. In his six years in office (two terms) there was more roading and other government works carried out in the region than in the previous thirty years. Vern was actually elected on a Social Credit ticket, but was the only representative of a third party elected since the 1930’s.
With the introduction of MMP (as disctinct from FPP) we now have some 6 “minor” parties in the House, four of which are represented as part of the government itself – allied in various ways to Auntie Helen’s mob.
Is the Vern example a good thing? Yes and no. Would a government of “independants” last? They would go before lunch – if only because individual electoral demands (euphemism for “I want to have power and continuance”) would get in the way of cooperation and progress…
Is the MMP example the way to go? It is certainly better than FPP. It would be an impossibility for the US for as long as you have your present Presidential system. If the President were elected from within the House and Senate structure then MMP might be a goer.
January 3rd, 2006 at 3:58 pm
“We’ll see more and more politicians running as independents trying to garner centrist votes. I don’t know if it’ll work, but I welcome the effort to try and establish some type of third way in the process.”
The problem here is money and organization network — unless the Independent candidate is independently wealthy and willing to finance their own campaign — an average Independent candidate is going to be unsuccessful.
January 3rd, 2006 at 5:32 pm
Agreed with DosPeros – but in addition to fundraising obstacles, the two party system has put up quite a few other barriers to Independents even getting on the ballot, much less elected.
As the Texas article I read mentioned, the main reason why there are more independents running is because the Republican is running unopposed – the petition to get on the ballot has to contain 46,000 signatures *from people who did not vote in any primary*
That means in any race where there are 2 or more significant candidates in each party, the pool of potential petitioners for any independent is much smaller.
I’m sure similar or worse situations exist in many other states and municipalities, and also if I recall the presidential race also has a pretty high barrier for independents and third party canadidates.
Until and unless the election system is reformed to remove the “good old boys only” clauses we’re probably mostly stuck with the donkey and the elephant.
January 3rd, 2006 at 7:30 pm
I highlighted this story too but added what I believe will be some implications on the election scene.
January 4th, 2006 at 12:19 pm
And, unfortunately, those same good ol boys are making the rules that continue to make it harder for independants.
January 27th, 2006 at 3:01 pm
Check
September 1st, 2006 at 5:13 pm
Thank you, I now have a much better understanding. Have a great day, Thanks again! Sue
November 19th, 2006 at 8:54 am
Looks good, have you enough time to do this great blog??