Woodward On Bush’s Denial

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Foreign Policy, War

There’s very little else a guy like me can take from a title like State of Denial. It supposes what the mindset of a President is like who is notorious for having a dearth of intellectual curiousity. Denial also speaks to an unexplainable inability to venture outside of a small circle of ideological immobile neo-cons.

In short, the state we’re in is because of the fears of a few. If we change we lose…and the one person who could be the most afraid currently occupies the the Oval Office.

From Woodward comes this about Andy Card’s views on his way out:

One of Card’s great worries was that Iraq would be compared to Vietnam. In March, there were 58,249 names on the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington. One of Kissinger’s private criticisms of Bush was that he had no mechanism in place, or even an inclination, to consider the downsides of impending decisions. Alternative courses of action were rarely considered.

As best Card could remember, there had been some informal, blue-sky discussions at times along the lines of “What could we do differently?” But there had been no formal sessions to consider alternatives to staying in Iraq. To his knowledge there were no anguished memos bearing the names of Cheney, Rice, Hadley, Rumsfeld, the CIA, Card himself or anyone else saying “Let’s examine alternatives,” as had surfaced after the Vietnam era.

Card put it on the generals in the Pentagon and Iraq. If they had come forward and said to the president “It’s not worth it” or “The mission can’t be accomplished,” Card was certain, the president would have said “I’m not going to ask another kid to sacrifice for it.”

Card was enough of a realist to see that two negative aspects to Bush’s public persona had come to define his presidency: incompetence and arrogance. Card did not believe that Bush was incompetent, and so he had to face the possibility that as Bush’s chief of staff, he might have been the incompetent one. In addition, he did not think the president was arrogant.

But the marketing of Bush had come across as arrogant. Maybe it was unfair in Card’s opinion, but there it was.

Wars are not won by being immobile and unchanging. They aren’t won by consistently breaking the rules by which this country has set and maintained the standard of freedom across the globe. In fact, those are the very things that lose wars, especially one based on ideas.

No, wars are won with commitment to our principles, a helluva a lot of bravery and some much needed creativity when the chips are down. We have the ability to execute on all three, but so far we’ve only seen one of those things. I’m sure you know which one I’m referring to, and we have our brave men and women in uniform to thank for that.

On the other hand, our President seems to live in a world where he thinks if he says it, it must be true. Immobile and unchanging is a sign of strength, and anything else will show the terrorists that they’re winning. And we damn well better believe that strategy unquestioningly, otherwise we too are giving aid and comfort to the enemy. This is simply crazy. No, not the “insane” type of crazy, but most definitely in the “keep doing the same thing over and over again and expect a different result” type of crazy.

Denial is a pretty simple thing because it’s born out of a fear of being wrong. But this isn’t some personal struggle Bush is going through…this is the future of our country and our credibility. And we deserve better than a foreign policy bereft of creativity and bursting at the seams with fear.


This entry was posted on Saturday, September 30th, 2006 and is filed under Foreign Policy, War. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “Woodward On Bush’s Denial”

  1. Bob J Young Says:

    If you want to know how the president thinks, just go to any right wing website. Denial is on constant display. If you take their comments in total, it is probably a representation of what is going thought he presidents mind.

    Someone needs to read a copy of “SUN TZU ON THE ART OF WAR� to Bush.

    “By commanding the army to advance or to retreat,
    being ignorant of the fact that it cannot obey.
    This is called hobbling the army.�

    Or

    “The general who advances without coveting fame
    and retreats without fearing disgrace, whose only
    thought is to protect his country and do good service
    for his sovereign, is the jewel of the kingdom.�

    Or

    “In a position of this sort, even though the enemy
    should offer us an attractive bait, it will be advisable
    not to stir forth, but rather to retreat, thus enticing
    the enemy in his turn; then, when part of his army has
    come out, we may deliver our attack with advantage.�

    http://www.chinapage.com/sunzi-e.html

  2. Casey Kochmer Says:

    Fear does drive many Americans from acting.

    And I just was doing a survey visiting many blogs which claim freedom to be what they support, and most of the top blogs were right wing blogs pushing fear not freedom.

    So I would sadly say the state we are in, are due to the fears of the many being pushed by the few…

    I don’t think Bush fears, he instead is pushing head on into his agenda without hesitation.

    My take on Freedom is that we have to act and be ourselves. To live outside fear.

    Not easy when only fear is being served up.

    peace

  3. wj Says:

    Justin, Of course you mean that he DOES have a notorious dearth of intellectual curiosity. Which is a source (albeit not the only one) of continuing tragedy for the nation and its people.

  4. Justin Gardner Says:

    Justin, Of course you mean that he DOES have a notorious dearth of intellectual curiosity.

    Ugh, yes…I did this on another post recently too as amba pointed out. She suggested more sleep. I’m going to suggest more attention to detail when I rewrite sentences.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: