Compassionate Conservatism Debunked?

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Money, Religion

A new book, “Tempting Faithâ€Â? by David Kuo, is about to come out…and it’s bad news for Bush. Really bad news.

Why? Well, this has the potential to be the most damning of all political portraits about the administration to the bookstores this campaign season because it paints Bush and his staff as mere opportunists who use and discard the Religious Right simply for political gain.

More importantly, though, is a systematic campaign by Bush operatives to decieve the entire American public by using the faith-based intiatives to fund organizations who would get out the vote for their side.

From MSNBC:

Kuo alleges that then-White House political affairs director Ken Mehlman knowingly participated in a scheme to use the office, and taxpayer funds, to mount ostensibly “nonpartisan� events that were, in reality, designed with the intent of mobilizing religious voters in 20 targeted races. [...]

Kuo quotes Mehlman as saying, “… (I)t can’t come from the campaigns. That would make it look too political. It needs to come from the congressional offices. We’ll take care of that by having our guys call the office [of faith-based initiatives] to request the visit.�

And then…this:

In fact, when Bush asks Kuo how much money was being spent on “compassion� social programs, Kuo claims he discovered “we were actually spending about $20 million a year less on them than before he had taken office.� [...]

“Many of the grant-winning organizations that rose to the top of the process were politically friendly to the administration,� he says.

More pointedly, Kuo quotes an unnamed member of the review panel charged with rating grant applications.

“But,� she said with a giggle, ‘When I saw one of those non-Christian groups in the set I was reviewing, I just stopped looking at them and gave them a zero … a lot of us did.’�

My question to all of you is how many more administration insiders are going to come out and systematically dismantle their image?

This entry was posted on Thursday, October 12th, 2006 and is filed under Money, Religion. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

8 Responses to “Compassionate Conservatism Debunked?”

  1. Edward Shipwash Says:

    A lot of us have known about this fraud for years, but now perhaps there will finally be an investigation. Using tax payer’s funds to create fradulent organizations with the sole aim of electing Republicans is a crime. Will the Bush administration be held accountable?

  2. Edward Shipwash Says:

    A lot of us have known about this fraud for years, but now perhaps there will be an investigation and the Bush administration will be held accountable.

  3. amba Says:

    That, more than anything else, will turn off the Christian Right. It’s shocking even to the jaded among us.

  4. ES Says:

    Ron Suskind had written an article 1 JAN 03 about John DiIulio who used to head the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives. It is a long article and it is a hatchet job on Karl Rove over a variety of subjects, but there are a few paragraphs covering religion. I have added one of those paragraphs below.

    http://www.ronsuskind.com/newsite/articles/archives/000032.html

    QUOTE - For instance, there was Karl’s desire to have John cozy up to the conservative evangelicals, with whom DiIulio was having problems. DiIulio recalls Karl telling him to bury the hatchet “and start fighting the guys who are against us.” DiIulio says he responded: “I’m not taking any shit off of Jerry Falwell. The souls of my dead Italian grandparents are crying out to me, ‘That guy’s not on the side of the angels.’ ” Rove backed off, DiIulio recalls, and said, “Look, those guys don’t really matter to this president.” - END QUOTE

  5. Lewis Says:

    Let’s see now, the party in power will try to give funds to organizations that are friendly to them. This is new news? And only evil repubs would do such a thing? Of course the dems would never, ever do something like that. Did you just fall off a turnip truck??

    And then of course there’s this “insider” that puts out a juicy new tell-all book that’s full of “claimed”and “alleged” statements made by other people. Certainly it can’t be about making money on juiced-up book sales.

    And every commenter here is lock-step agreeing. Lets see - if it’s Christian it can’t be good, if it’s republican it must be bad. And this passes for a critical thinking thought process?

  6. Mark Harder Says:

    I’d be willing to believe that the Dems would engage in using public programs and their funds to advance party interests and thereby deprive their intended beneficiaries if Lewis would provide some concrete examples, or at least some references to such. But I’m a little tired of being called naive if I don’t jump to such a conclusion without the facts, a common defense of Republican outrages these days.
    As for the verity of Kuo’s revelations, we need to check those of his assertions that can be verified. Any takers?
    And finally, I’ll have to give the Administration credit for being more acute than I once thought if another of Kuo’s allegations is true: some biggies referred to Robertson, Falwell, and as the “nuts”. Behind their back, of course (I heard this from the MSNBC broadcast).

  7. steve Says:

    Ummm….point to the ‘Christian = bad’ in the preceding passages….using _any kind of thinking. geeze…desperate.

  8. Donklephant » Blog Archive » Losing Faith In George W. Bush Says:

    [...] A majority of the American public has, but it’s not often that former high-level aides speak so candidly about their boss and his failings. David Kuo was one. Matthew Dowd is now another. [...]

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: