<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How much does the government owe?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2006/12/19/how-much-does-the-government-owe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/19/how-much-does-the-government-owe/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:53:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: grognard</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/19/how-much-does-the-government-owe/comment-page-1/#comment-164279</link>
		<dc:creator>grognard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/19/how-much-does-the-government-owe/#comment-164279</guid>
		<description>And remember if we elect Republicans they will enact a balanced budget amendment as a part of the contract with America ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And remember if we elect Republicans they will enact a balanced budget amendment as a part of the contract with America ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sleipner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/19/how-much-does-the-government-owe/comment-page-1/#comment-163921</link>
		<dc:creator>sleipner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 21:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/19/how-much-does-the-government-owe/#comment-163921</guid>
		<description>Of course another extremely useful change is to ban the government from spending money it doesn&#039;t have.  In my opinion, taxes (particularly on the wealthy, who owe their wealth in large part to our society) are way too low to pay for required governmental services, and many things the government should be doing are not being done.

If the trend continues with reckless spending and even more reckless tax cuts, we will be a province of China by 2050.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course another extremely useful change is to ban the government from spending money it doesn&#8217;t have.  In my opinion, taxes (particularly on the wealthy, who owe their wealth in large part to our society) are way too low to pay for required governmental services, and many things the government should be doing are not being done.</p>
<p>If the trend continues with reckless spending and even more reckless tax cuts, we will be a province of China by 2050.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Crim</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/19/how-much-does-the-government-owe/comment-page-1/#comment-163412</link>
		<dc:creator>William Crim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 07:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/19/how-much-does-the-government-owe/#comment-163412</guid>
		<description>I think that the single, most useful, change that we can make to government, is to change their accounting rules so that they account for Retirement/Health/Entitlement programs using the same rules as they require business.  

An accurate picture of risks woudl allow us to either scrap unsustainable programs, or put them on proper funding/benefits trajectories.  New social programs would be less controversial if the true future costs were accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the single, most useful, change that we can make to government, is to change their accounting rules so that they account for Retirement/Health/Entitlement programs using the same rules as they require business.  </p>
<p>An accurate picture of risks woudl allow us to either scrap unsustainable programs, or put them on proper funding/benefits trajectories.  New social programs would be less controversial if the true future costs were accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
