Yet another take

By Sean Aqui | Related entries in Foreign Policy, General Politics, News, The War On Terrorism, The World, War

My take on Bush’s speech:

More of the same, punctuated with spurious justifications and disheartening implicit admissions that he was slow to admit what the rest of us saw long ago, and that he pursued a strategy (”clear and hold”) even though he didn’t have the resources to make it work.

His proposed pacification campaign will work because we have more troops and because the Iraqis have promised that this time their troops will do a good job and they won’t let politics interfere.

Some good (if minor and unsurprising) ideas, like revenue-sharing, demobilizing militias and allowing Baathists back into government.

I go into it in greater detail over at Midtopia. But bottom line: This is not a change, and it’s still rife with wishful thinking (or, if you’re a bit more pessimistic, willful denial of reality).

We are in trouble.


This entry was posted on Thursday, January 11th, 2007 and is filed under Foreign Policy, General Politics, News, The War On Terrorism, The World, War. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Yet another take”

  1. Matt Ortega Says:

    If the escalation of forces is too small, and we do not have the numbers to add the hundreds of thousands that we originally needed, according to General Eric Shinseki, it begs the question:

    Why do it at all?

    Paul Reickhoff said it best: This is a draw play on fourth and long.

    More on my take here.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts:

  • No related posts