Clinton Wins Big In Puerto Rico

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Barack, Blogging, Democrats, Elections, Hillary, Pledged Delegates, Puerto Rico, Super Delegates!!!

By more than 2 to 1…

The cable networks called the island territory for Clinton the instant polls closed at 3:00 p.m., indicating a landslide; exit polls showed her winning virtually every group, including young voters typically loyal to nomination rival Barack Obama.

“I am overwhelmed by this vote today,” Clinton said in her victory speech. She used the speech to press the case that she’s proven her superior electability by pulling more popular votes than Obama.

She said more people have voted for her “than for any candidate in the history of presidential primaries. We are winning the popular vote.”

But is she really winning the popular vote? Because let’s remember that Clinton isn’t counting four caucus states that don’t report popular vote. With those, Obama is ahead by about 44,000 votes. Obviously this isn’t a large margin, but for her to claim outright that she leads the popular vote is misleading at best.

Right now the delegate count (according to Real Clear Politics) stands at…

Obama – 2,068
Clinton – 1,914

So Obama needs 50 to reach the new number of 2,118. The primaries on Tuesday should bring him within 20 35 of that total.

So…will more than 20 35 superdelegates stand up and stop this or will they wait until the convention?

More as it develops…


This entry was posted on Sunday, June 1st, 2008 and is filed under Barack, Blogging, Democrats, Elections, Hillary, Pledged Delegates, Puerto Rico, Super Delegates!!!. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “Clinton Wins Big In Puerto Rico”

  1. Rob in Denver Says:

    During CNN’s coverage of the RBC on Saturday, someone in the studio mentioned that a bunch of supers are waiting for the end of the primaries and mentioned we could see a gob of them June 4 and June 5.

    I’m betting that Obama will have the nomination by the end of this weekend.

  2. Tully Says:

    *But is she really winning the popular vote? Because let’s remember that Clinton isn’t counting four caucus states that don’t report popular vote. With those, Obama is ahead by about 44,000 votes.?*

    Problem for Obama being that those four caucus results weren’t votes, and the numbers are only estimates of the number participating apportioned by delegate wins. And WA actually DID have a primary, even if it didn’t really count for delegate selection. But the problem for Clinton is that the popular vote just doesn’t count. The popular-vote argument here is just a talking point speaking to electability, and a 0.2% difference isn’t much of a lever there.

    She’s using the rhetoric of popular/populist democracy to boost her standing and bolster her case, in a Democratic nomination process that is only vaguely democratic at best. Legitimate tactic–but highly unlikely to work for her in getting the nomination, barring a *major* Obama implosion between now and the convention.

  3. wj Says:

    What fascinates me is the willingness of the Clinton campaign to discount anything resembling popular votes from caucus states, while happily counting popular votes from Puerto Rico…which will have no vote in the general election. I can understand why they would want to, of course. But one has to wonder: what kind of logic/rationalization they are using for it.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: