Obama Veep Updates
By Jennn Fusion | Related entries in Veep1. Who’s NOT Going to be VEEP:
Mark Warner (VA)
Hillary Clinton (NY)
Janet Napolitano (AZ)
Kathleen Sebelius (KS)
Ted Strickland (OH)
Bob Casey Jr (PA)
Brian Schweitzer (MN)
Ed Rendell (PA)
Federico Peña (CO)
Deval Patrick (MA)
Claire McCaskill (MS)
These are the confirmed speakers (who’ve been previously mentioned in the veepstakes) for Monday and Tuesday at the Democratic National Convention. Since the vice presidential nominee is slated to speak on Wednesday, it’s not likely any of these people will have a double speaking slot both days.
Some also say it’s unlikely that Virginia’s Tim Kaine will get the spot either, since Mark Warner (another Virginian) is going to co-host the keynote speech with Hillary Clinton on Tuesday. It’s technically possible to have a keynote speaker and a VEEP from the same state, but it’s highly unlikely.
Scheduled to speak on the Wednesday Veep night so far are: Joe Biden, Evan Bayh, Harry Reid, Jay Rockefeller and Ken Salazar. Does that mean Bayh or Biden could be it?
2. Kaine’s feeling glum. Recently Kaine was quoted as saying, “I haven’t spent that much time thinking about it because I didn’t think, and still don’t think, it’s that likely that I’m going to get a phone call,” he says. “I’ve always thought it was kind of a long shot, or not all that likely, but it’s out of my control, so I’ll just focus on the things I can control, which is helping in Virginia.” And according to The Washington Post, a Tim Kaine associate said Tuesday night that “the governor had seemed glum, and believed that he would ‘get the silver medal’ in the vice presidential sweepstakes.” Since Obama made national security the theme of his Veep speech, it’s further unlikely that he’d pick a guy like Kaine, whose experience is limited.
3. Tom Daschle sounds equally down. On Tuesday, he told reporters at The Hill, “I really don’t expect to be asked and I haven’t weighed in on it.†He adds that he’s “tried to keep at an honest length†from Obama’s decision making process. “The two biggest things he has to decide are, one, who would make a good president if needed, and second, among those qualified, who does he have the best chemistry with that would allow a good team effort and who would he feel most comfortable delegating responsibility to? Those are far and away the most important factors.â€
4. Evan Bayh is scheduled for another high-profile interview! This week on CBS “Face the Nation,” Bayh will square off against Tim Pawlenty in what some say is “final tryouts for the vice presidency.” If Bayh steps up his game and appears strong this weekend, it might be the final go-ahead Obama’s looking for.
5. However, not everyone is cool with Evan Bayh. Personally, I think Bayh is the most likely pick. There. I’ve said it. He’s a pretty safe bet with no real baggage and he’s just hawkish enough to take on the McCain camp, carefully balancing out Obama’s soaring idealism. Yet there’s a group of discontent Liberals who are sulking about Evan’s adamant initial support of the War in Iraq. In fact, there’s a Facebook Group called “100,000 Strong Against Evan Bayh” that is looking to “send a message to the Obama campaign that Evan Bayh is not the right choice for Vice President” and has attracted support from bloggers like Spencer Ackerman, Steve Clemons,Taylr Marsh, Mike Lux and Ari Melber.
6. Bill Richardson stumped for Obama in South Florida this past weekend, although he’s also been holding fundraisers for Hillary Clinton so we shouldn’t dwell too deeply on this. He’s just keeping his foot in the door for some sort of admin role, I’m sure.
7. The theme for the vice presidential nominee’s speech Wednesday night is “Securing America’s Future” and will be themed around national security. Coincidentally enough, that theme is also the name of Wesley Clark’s PAC! Clark laughed hysterically and called it an “interesting coincidence,” but one thing is for sure: Obama’s VEEP will have a penchant for foreign affairs and security issues.
This entry was posted on Friday, August 15th, 2008 and is filed under Veep. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.











August 15th, 2008 at 2:16 pm
Yes, there is a group called “100,000 Strong Against Evan Bayh” … with 2,000 members…
August 15th, 2008 at 2:25 pm
Obama – Hagel ‘08!!!!
Agnostick
agnostick@excite.com
P.S. And today’s CAPTCHA is…
“Socialists paper”
LOL!!
August 15th, 2008 at 4:07 pm
The problem here is BarryHo can’t imagine anyone else getting the spotlight but him. He really does want a black running mate. Since the Dems are so non-racist, why shouldn’t he? Why shouldn’t he have an all black cabinet and all black advisors to surround him??
August 15th, 2008 at 6:09 pm
Forget those milk-toasts… Barack needs to put Carolyn Kennedy on his ticket. It’s a NO-BRAINER…
August 16th, 2008 at 1:19 am
It will be a real message of CHANGE if…
… Obama can defy traditional choice of white male for veep and go for a female. Make history twice in your moment.
… Obama can rise above partisan divide and exemplify unity with Hillary as veep. Make the choice in the inclusive spirit of bridging democrats of past to democrats of future by being “Father” of all democrats in his present.
And he puts forth a strong statement: A great president includes strong players and make them work for good — of his vision, his campaign, his legacy. He should not be daunted by Bill. He should choose Hillary for veep. And that’s very Christian too — reconciliation, restoration, transformation, peace, unity, and everything else shall be added unto him and America.
August 16th, 2008 at 3:04 pm
I wouldn’t necessary read too much into the confirmed speakers (non VP night). The convention planners probably have no idea who Obama will pick (if they knew, we’d all know) and any schedule isn’t set in stone. To signal the VP pick just by scheduling seems to obvious for the Obama camp, which has been very good at keeping news under wraps.
August 16th, 2008 at 8:25 pm
Based on the following assumptions, the name is likely to be on the list of six at the end of this email.
Assumptions
>His choice will not be a woman – other than Senator Hillary Clinton.
>Will not be someone who has already received media attention or speculation as being “vetted,” per Senator Obama’s own statement.
>Will not be a Senator, as two Senators on the same ticket have not been elected since John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson in 1960.
>Will be from a battleground state that will be in play in November.
>Has not ruled self out of the running.
>Will be a Catholic, as (a) this segment of the voting population (of the 27% of voters who are Catholic, the Republican Presidential ticket in 2004 had a margin of 5%, which was an increase from the Democratic Presidential ticket’s margin of 2% in 2000) is critical to a Democratic victory, (b) Senator Obama performed poorly with Catholics in the Democratic primaries/caucuses, and (c) polls show Catholics evenly divided between Senators Obama and McCain.
The List (in order of state electoral votes)
>Anthony Zinni, Retired General, Pennsylvania: 21 electoral votes, Catholics are 29.4% of the population
>Phil Bredesen, Governor of Tennessee: 11 electoral votes, Catholics are 3.2% of the population
>James Doyle, Governor of Wisconsin: 10 electoral votes, Catholics are 29% of the population
>Bill Ritter, Governor of Colorado: 9 electoral votes, Catholics are 14.7% of the population
>Joe Manchin, Governor of West Virginia: 5 electoral votes, Catholics are 4.6% of the population
>John Lynch, Governor of New Hampshire: 4 electoral votes, Catholics are 24% of the population
–William Arnone
August 20th, 2008 at 7:38 pm
Paul Kopper and Michael Moore are right. Obama/Kennedy. Barack needs to win his base back, and Caroline Kennedy as VP will win back voters he has lost over FISA and other base blunders.