Hey, I Thought It Was Obama’s Convention

By Doug Mataconis | Related entries in 2008 Election, Barack, Democrats, Hillary

The Democratic National Convention should be Barack Obama’s shining hour. For one thing, he did what one year ago most pundits considered to be the improbable by becoming the nominee of the Democratic Party after one of the most grueling primary battles in recent political history. For another, he’s scheduled to accept the nomination of that party, the party that once was controlled by slaveholders and the proponents of Jim Crow, on the forty-five years to do the day after Martin Luther King, Jr.’s iconic “I Have A Dream” speech.

It’s supposed to be Barack Obama’s convention, but everyone’s still talking about the Clintons.

Both the Washington Post and the New York Times have reports today about Clinton supporters who still aren’t fully sold on Barack Obama, like this delegate from Maryland:

DENVER, Aug. 25 — The Maryland Democrats were busy burying any lingering rivalries between Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton supporters under an avalanche of hugs, kisses and cocktails during a reception here the other night when Gov. Martin O’Malley bounded onstage.

“We have one nominee, and we are one party!” O’Malley, who had endorsed Clinton, shouted after embracing Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, an Obama backer. “Whether we supported Hillary or not, we are one party.”

But off to the side, Mary Boergers, a Clinton delegate from Montgomery County, felt more like a party of one. Boergers, 62, a retired political science professor, was wearing two Hillary buttons, and she intends to vote for her during convention’s roll call Thursday night.

“I find it perplexing that they make us feel like outliers or rogues because at the convention we plan to vote for the candidate we were elected to vote for,” said Boergers, who was still steaming from Obama’s selection of Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. of Delaware as his running mate.

“It’s just offensive,” Boergers said. “If he said [Clinton] was on the shortlist and did not vet her at all, what does that say about the veracity of his words? My intent was to come to Denver with an open mind. . . . How all of us would be treated is a measure of how inclusive Obama’s campaign and presidency would be. His campaign is all about post-partisan Washington, but if he can’t even do it with his own party, how can he do it as president?”

And, as the Politico reports in it’s second story on the Clintons in as many days, it’s not just delegates who are having a hard time getting over the bitterness that arose during the campaign:

Hillary Rodham Clinton is over it — at least when people are watching.

Within days of losing the Democratic nomination to Barack Obama, her aides said she was all business, returning to her Senate duties, telling people she would do whatever Obama asked her to do in the general election.

Bill Clinton is not over it. He’s trying, his associates say. He’s slowly getting to a better place. But his resentments from the bitter campaign battles of last winter and spring are many and diverse, and people who have spent time with him recently said they fester just below the surface.

And Obama, apparently, isn’t taking many steps to mend fences with the Clintons:

Obama has maintained a certain cool diffidence toward the former president. They spoke by phone last week. But for weeks before that, associates said, Clinton had heard nothing and did not even know when he would be speaking at the convention. The Obama campaign’s only communication was a form letter sent to all delegates.

Clinton loves to offer advice to fellow Democrats. But even in their conversations, Clinton friends say, Obama shows little deference or signs that he thinks Clinton, the only Democrat since Franklin D. Roosevelt to win two terms, has any special wisdom to offer.

“There is a lot Obama could have done to unify the party, and basically he hasn’t lifted a finger,” said one Democratic operative who is close to the Clinton team.

Howard Wolfson, Hillary Clinton’s former communications director, wrote in the New Republic on Tuesday that Bill Clinton “feels like the Obama campaign ran against and systematically dismissed his administration’s accomplishments.

In other words, Barack Obama, the guy who actually won the nomination and beat the once-thought-unbeatable Clinton Machine, hasn’t kowtowed sufficiently to a former President. It’s an ego thing, apparently.

On top of all that, Clintons still apparently think that their criticisms Obama during the primary season remain true and that his victory in November is by no means certain:

[T]he Clintons believe a Democratic loss is entirely possible. They no longer vocalize their beliefs that Obama has scant experience and faces huge problems connecting with lower-income whites and other key voting blocs. But the criticism they leveled last winter and spring — both publicly and more sharply in private conversations with top Democrats — were entirely sincere at the time, and have not gone away.

As Hillary Clinton looks to the future, an ex-aide said, “She wants to reassert her relevance and introduce a new political identity.

“I think she understands that if she runs again, she has to run a different style of campaign,” this ex-aide said. “And she’s got a huge opening right now: For the first time in her career, she actually has a base to invigorate. At the beginning of the ‘08 campaign, she was the issue: She had to explain herself, her celebrity. Now she’s got a base — the working class — and she needs to speak to them.”

If she runs again ? Trust me, if Barack Obama loses on November 4th, the Hillary in `12 campaign will begin on November 5th.

That’s why Hillary Clinton has several tasks before her as she prepares to take the stage at the convention tonight. She has to appear to be the loyal Democrat rallying behind the nominee, which is why she’ll urge her delegates and supporters to vote for Barack Obama and try to disavow all those negative comments about Obama that the McCain campaign is already starting to exploit. She has to provide catharsis for supporters who still haven’t gotten over her loss and exclusion from the Vice-Presidential sweepstakes. And, somewhere, in the back of her mind, she’ll be thinking about her political future and where she’ll be in four years if Election Day 2008 doesn’t turn out the way the Obama Campaign would like.


This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 26th, 2008 and is filed under 2008 Election, Barack, Democrats, Hillary. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

9 Responses to “Hey, I Thought It Was Obama’s Convention”

  1. bubbles Says:

    Based on the current narrative in the MSM, if Obama loses Hillary Clinton will get the blame for staying in too long and she will become the most unpopular Democrat in the country next to John Edwards.

  2. Dodgeblogium » Obama’s convention bounce… Says:

    [...] A good piece on why its Clinton’s convention and not really Obama’s at all. [...]

  3. mike mcEachran Says:

    Yeah, I think poor Hillary is damned either way. I for one will blame her. Forget about how angry the blacks will be at an Obama loss. It has been widely feared, for good reason, that Bill and Hillary are so perversely in it for themselves that they are willing to implode the party if they don’t get what they want. I think we’re seeing it happen. At this point, either Obama is the leader of the Democratic party for the next two election cycles, or if not, Hillary is to blame, and Dems won’t forgive her for it. She’s damned either way, and she needs to wake up to that hard reality. Soon.

  4. Avinash_Tyagi Says:

    She better come out tonight and fire all guns at McCain, really tear into him, and throw a lot of support to Obama or her political career is done, even if she runs in 2012 if Obama loses, I won’t vote for her unless she proves to me she’s really trying to help him win. Right now its her supporters who are giving the dems headaches, so she can forget my vote in 2012

  5. Below The Beltway » Blog Archive » Bill Clinton Is Still At It Says:

    [...] thoughts on what was supposed to be Barack Obama’s convention over at Donklephant.   [...]

  6. mw Says:

    “That’s why Hillary Clinton has several tasks before her …” - DM

    Doug,
    Clinton will do every single thing you mention, and it will change nothing. Just like she had a similar expectation list put on her plate for her concession speech, for her joint appearance with Obama, on and on ad anuseum, and it changed the dynamic not one whit. That is because the problem is not with the Clinton supporters. The problem among Dems is the prevalence of Clinton Derangement Syndrome that continues to be exhibited by too many Obama supporters. Case in point - Avinash. Clinton supporters are being driven from the fold by such supporters.

  7. Avinash_Tyagi Says:

    Actually Clinton supporters brought this upon themselves mw, by their repeated comments about how they wouldn’t support Obama, calling him a secret Muslim, launching racist attacks, unless she really does bring them behind Obama her career is over, she’ll get a bigger backlash than anything Obama is getting now. Obama is young and even if he loses could set his sights on the white house again a decade or so from now, but Hillary doesn’t have that luxury, she has to look like she really wants to be a part of this if she’s hoping to be president before she’s too old.

  8. Tully Says:

    Bingo, mw. The Cannibal Feast continues.

    The way to re-capture those Clinton supporters is not to tell them to STFU and support Obama or else. But that’s the approach being used, and it’s failing.

  9. mw Says:

    Actually, Avinash, the very first Democrats who said that they would not support the Democratic candidates if their preferred candidate did not win, were all Obama supporters. The loudest and most strident Democrats who said they would not support the Democratic nominee if Clinton won, were all Obama supporters. It started as early as Iowa, and for months it was only Obama supporters who said they would not support the Dem nominee if their candidate did not win. It was not until after Super Tuesday that I first started hearing the same thing from Clinton supporters, who finally got tired of hearing Obama supporters tell them (as Tully correctly states) to STFU and get in line.

    Question for Avinash - How far back do I have to go on this site to find a comment from you where you state you will not support Clinton if she wins? How many will I find?

    BTW - I just heard Clinton’s speech. As Obama acolyte Keith Olbernmann said “It was a grand slam out of the park home run.” She did every single thing DM outlined here, and every single thing every talking head said she had to do.

    So there you go, Avinash.

    If Obama loses this because there are Clinton supporters who cannot get over how they were treated by Obama supporters - Don’t look at Obama, don’t look at Hillary Clinton, don’t look at Bill Clinton for blame - just go look in the mirror.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: