From The Republican Party Platform Circa 2008…

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in 2008 Election, Economy, Republicans

And I quote..

We do not support government bailouts of private institutions. Government interference in the markets exacerbates problems in the marketplace and causes the free market to take longer to correct itself. We believe in the free market as the best tool to sustained prosperity and opportunity for all.

Obviously the current crisis we find ourselves in is unique, but let’s do a quick thought experiment. Imagine John Kerry had won in 2004. Now imagine he tried to sell the Republicans on a $700B bailout of private institutions right before the election.

Now, one would hope that everybody would work together in a spirit of bi-partisanship, but I can’t help but think that many conservatives wouldn’t stop at the world “socialism” to describe a fictional Kerry bailout.

But hey, thankfully Bush is president, right?

As I’ve said in the past, you can’t own the successes and not own the failures too. It just doesn’t work that way. So either the Republicans should change their platform or stick to their guns. Time to choose.

(h/t: Below The Beltway)


This entry was posted on Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 and is filed under 2008 Election, Economy, Republicans. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “From The Republican Party Platform Circa 2008…”

  1. Jimmy the Dhimmi Says:

    Its nonsense when people claim that this mortgage crisis is a result of the Free Market. Fannie and Freddie are government-created agencies that were being pressured by Congress to promote a social policy of closing the minority gap in home ownership.

    Read this amazing article from the New York times circa 1999. It predicted the whole fiasco:

    Fannie Mae, the nation’s biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.

    McQ at QandO has a good take on it here

    So here we have the ‘free market’, as some would like to claim, enacting social policy through a quasi-government company who has the backing of the government to do precisely what that government wanted it to do.

    They felt they could market these securities as AAA ratings because they were told that the government had their backs. Everytime someone tried to set up oversight as these organizations took on trillions of debt, Do-gooders in Congress fought hard to stop it because it interfeared with their social engineering. See Barney Frank.

    Free market? Hardly. And having an agency set up to assess risk and oversee that those ratings were accurate?(As the Bush administration requested in 2003) Hardly socialsm.

  2. gerryf Says:

    Here we go again…..

    Jimmy, you’re just going to keep blaming everyone except those who deserve it, aren’t you?

    While the Community Reinvestment Act didn’t help, and while the Dems deserve some blame for poor oversight, these relatively paltry loans for inner city homeowners you are talking about are not the cause of this crisis and you either know it and are lying or don’t want to know it so you can continue spinning your fantasy.

    Community Reinvestment Act banks were substantially less likely than other lenders to make the kinds of risky home purchase loans that helped fuel the foreclosure crisis.

    The Community Reinvestment Act loans of which you speak
    constituted only 23% of all loans and 9.2% of high-cost loans.

    Community Reinvestment Act loans were twice as likely to be retained in the originating bank’s portfolio than loans made by other institutions–that means they were not resold and were not part of the problem that has created this crisis.

    Community Reinvestment Act loans were less likely to be foreclosed upon than other loans.

    Never let the facts get in the way of a good partisan lie….

  3. Jimmy the Dhimmi Says:

    The same Ponzi scheme that was created by Congress through legislation like the CRA was so profitable for Fannie/Freddie shareholders that it was scaled up to include higher levers of income. As long as there is no redlining, everything is Ok according to congress. Again from McQ:

    The heart of this failure came from a mandate by members of Congress from both parties that demanded easier loan terms for marginally-qualified buyers. At first, this meant working-class families, but it also resulted in easier terms all the way through to the highest income levels. Lower qualifiers meant more buyers, and buyers buying bigger houses. The net effect of this was to create a much higher demand for housing and for mortgages.

    Any attempt to regulate this was consistently blocked by Democrats in Congress because it would have restricted lending to low income and minority households as well. That is simply a fact that people wish to ignore because as long as people are willing to perceive Republicans and Capitalism as the culprit, the public will allow more socialism to creep in.

    This is the same type of oversight that is only now recommended by Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, as they hope the media doesn’t bring up the fact that they were the ones who opposed it in 2003 and 2005.

  4. Jeremy from Oregon Says:

    LOL! Could the American flag backdrop be any larger than in this photo? What a bunch of primitive, jingoistic cave dwellers. Wave the flag some more so the feeble minded can find their way please. And Americans wonder why the rest of the world finds us arrogant and uneducated. America isn’t a flag. America is the actions we choose to take. Not Über flags of the “Homeland.”
    I swear, Republicans are is shallowest group of knuckle-draggers.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: