The Obama Transition As Reality TV

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Barack, Good Decisions, Technology, Transparency, Video

One very smart thing Obama’s team is doing is documenting what is going on behind the scenes so if the American public wants to find out more, they can.

First, take a look at this piece about the environment and energy team…



Note how they’re talking about how their policies will help create jobs, but still be bi-partisanship. And this consistent messaging makes me believe that it isn’t just lip service. I genuinely believe that Obama and the people who are working for him want to unify this country in a way I’ve never experience in my lifetime.

Now check out this video where somebody from Obama’s energy team actually answers questions that people submitted to the Change.gov website…



It’s pretty clear to me that Obama is completely changing the game by using social technologies like YouTube and blogs and comments to make Americans feel like they’re really included in this presidency and that we’re united by a common purpose to make this country better. It’s as if nearly everybody can have a seat at the table if they want to be included. All they have to do is add their voice at Change.gov and they can be part of the conversation.

And after 8 years of a historically secretive administration, this level of transparency is not just refreshing…it’s imperative to restoring people’s faith in government.

This entry was posted on Saturday, November 22nd, 2008 and is filed under Barack, Good Decisions, Technology, Transparency, Video. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

13 Responses to “The Obama Transition As Reality TV”

  1. mw Says:

    “And this consistent messaging makes me believe that it isn’t just lip service.” - jg

    As I recall, the consistent messaging coming from the Bush administration was referred to as Rove’s “Talking Points.” The mindless repetition of the same repeated phrases coming from the blogosphere was the “wingnut echo chamber”. But this is different now. It’s on YouTube.

    As always when dealing with politicians - it’s not the talk, it’s the walk.

    Even if the talk is on YouTube.

  2. 24AheadDotCom's take on it Says:

    My name’s link is a quick satire on the reality TV aspects of things like this.

    It’s as if nearly everybody can have a seat at the table if they want to be included. All they have to do is add their voice at Change.gov and they can be part of the conversation.

    No one can be that delusional, right? Of course, the weasel word there is “almost”; those who would point out all the ways BHO is incredibly wrong would either be ignored, investigated, or shouted down via the megaphone BHO has but his opponents don’t have.

    Expect a lot of “honest conversations” ahead:

    http://24ahead.com/blog/archives/007603.html

  3. Justin Gardner Says:

    There’s a difference between partisan talking points meant to make the other side look like the enemy and consistent messaging about bi-partisanship and pragmatic policy.

    Also, by showcasing their meetings on YouTube and answering questions submitted by Americans, this is putting Obama’s “talk” of unity into action. So what you’re seeing is “walk.”

  4. mw Says:

    “There’s a difference between partisan talking points meant to make the other side look like the enemy and consistent messaging about bi-partisanship and pragmatic policy.” - jg

    Indeed. The difference is almost completely attributable to whether the person doing the listening agrees with the person doing the talking.

    We’ll see the walk when we see the bills in Congress and the executive orders out of the Oval Office. Until then, it’s talk.

  5. Justin Gardner Says:

    Mike, your first comment was about the idea that there’s no difference between what Obama’s team is saying and what Rove and the blogosphere have said…just that I’m characterizing them differently. Well, if you watch the video, they’re talking specifically about bi-partisanship, while Rove and the wingnut/moonbat blogosphere were never talking about those things. So that’s not a matter of opinion nor semantics.

    Also, your definition of “walk” is much more narrow and limiting then I think is appropriate, but this is obviously a personal preference. However, I’d argue that what you see here should count since they’re actively posting their meetings online and answering Americans questions. That’s transparency in action, and we haven’t seen that before from any President.

  6. Donklephant » Blog Archive » President 2.0 Says:

    [...] I highlighted this yesterday, and today NBC takes a look at how Obama is using the internet to get his message out as the President elect. [...]

  7. ExiledIndependent Says:

    This is hysterical. Folks, this isn’t transparency. It’s simply a politician using some newer channels of communication to promote an image. Social media is still media, and it’s as susceptible to manipulation as any other communication channel. But because it “feels” more truthy, we react differently to it than we would, say, a TV commercial. We assume that social media is honest. Careful with that.

  8. Doug Mataconis Says:

    [T]his isn’t transparency. It’s simply a politician using some newer channels of communication to promote an image. Social media is still media, and it’s as susceptible to manipulation as any other communication channel.

    Exactly.

  9. Justin Gardner Says:

    Now wait a second, EI…there’s a big difference between a politician pushing talking points through a pundit show and this. These are people who would usually stay exclusively behind the scenes, but we’re seeing a more unvarnished view. Yes, of course it’s still tape and people understand that they’re being taped, but it doesn’t make it false.

    And nobody is saying that just because it’s social media it’s honest. Still, tell me how it’s dishonest. Until you can prove that, giving these people the benefit of the doubt is appropriate.

  10. blackoutyears Says:

    Justin, you can’t convince a cynic, much less a cynic whose ideology predisposes them against a candidate. Just remember that they’re all crooks and liars and you’ll be fine.

  11. Doug Mataconis Says:

    Justin,

    Sorry, but what about that “meeting” makes you think that it wasn’t staged for the camera ?

  12. Obama’s PoliticoRealityTV « Burroughs Adding Machine Says:

    [...] analysis of Obama’s Change.gov website and the new President-Elect’s use of YouTube. “It’s as if nearly everybody can have a seat at the table if they want to be included. All [...]

  13. » More on Naked Presidency Stuff Says:

    [...] has a Youtube channel where it posts videos from different offices about what they are working on. Donkelephant says it’s like Obama and his team are a reality show playing out in front of the nation via [...]

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: