Obama Selects Rick Warren for Invocation

By Alan Stewart Carl | Related entries in Barack, Homosexuality, Obama Appointments, Religion


This isn’t going to make gay rights activists happy.

Barack Obama has selected evangelical pastor Rick Warren to deliver the invocation at his inauguration. Once again, Obama seems more interested in reaching out rather than reaching inwards towards his base.

While Warren is not of the fire-and-brimstone mold, he did play a prominent role in the success of California’s Proposition 8. Obama’s choice of Warren signals that the president-elect is not likely to enter the White House with a progressive gay rights agenda. He was apparently honest when, throughout the campaign, he said he did not support gay marriage.

But I’m surprised he’d look to a conservative such as Warren for this important moment. I guess Rev. Jeremiah Wright was busy that day.

Other prominent guests at Obama’s inauguration will not cause as much controversy. Aretha Franklin, Itzhak Perlman and Yo-Yo Ma will all perform.

This entry was posted on Thursday, December 18th, 2008 and is filed under Barack, Homosexuality, Obama Appointments, Religion. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

10 Responses to “Obama Selects Rick Warren for Invocation”

  1. EvilPoet Says:

    That olive branch has thorns. OUCH. The Rick Warren pick is not sitting very well with this straight atheist either. I hope the opinions I have read are correct and this is much ado about nothing.

  2. mike mcEachran Says:

    Sure he’s a “nice evangelical”, but if you press him, he still thinks half of his audience is going to burn in hell for eternity. Although if you read his stuff, I have a feeling he doesn’t really think that – he tends to skirt the issue so he doesn’t turn off his “hell-bent” base. Anyone have any info on that? The hell thing is a big issue for me – that issue kind of devides the sheep from the goats in my mind.

  3. Jimmy the Dhimmi Says:

    Then again, he is one of these young, hip pastors who believes that using the power of government to help the poor through a socialist, planned economy is very Christian-like. Maybe by throwing his weight behind a president that will make the legality of Abortion permanent through his judiciary appointments, he is saying, “well at least they will be socially just abortions, because they will be taxpayer funded.” That’s something Jesus could get behind!

  4. George Mauer Says:

    I don’t see what the big deal is. He’s giving an invocation not presiding over … well … over anything. In addition, as far as evangelical preachers go he’s quite milquetoast.

    In addition, he says equal rights for all and he says he’s worried about churches being forced to preform gay weddings. This is basically the conclusion that many commentators reached in the discussion following prop 8 – that marriage maybe should be only a religious term and civic unions be the only legal nomenclature.

    I don’t know too much about this guy but maybe we should play nice with him, he might not be as demonic as some like to make out.

  5. mike mcEachran Says:

    George – I tend to agree with you. (I’m one of the gays, FYI)

  6. rob Says:

    In addition, he says equal rights for all and he says he’s worried about churches being forced to preform gay weddings.

    if he is really worried about churches being forced to do gay weddings, he is a moron and should be disqualified for that.

  7. George Mauer Says:

    What do you mean rob? That is the only real problem, at least the only problem that I’m willing to acknowledge as being anything but utter stupidity. From what I understand, the concern is that if say the supreme court or something said that gays must be able to get married while the rest of the law remained the same, the structure of it is such that a refusal of a particular church to marry someone could be construed as illegal discrimination.

    The astoundingly obvious solution is to modify the law so that this is not an issue. Hence the proposal to have everything be a civil union in the state’s eyes. As far as I can tell, opposition to this idea is what sifts out the true hate-mongers, and hence not something they like to bring up much. Those of us who support sanity in the meantime have been perfectly satisfied to hurl names and squabble with those same people rather than exposing them with this very clear solution.

  8. Donklephant » Blog Archive » Why Warren Invocation Is Right Signal For Unity Says:

    [...] its face, the Warren pick seems like a slap in the face to the progressive gay movement, and I can understand why this group [...]

  9. Agnostick Says:

    Rick Warren’s probably an okay guy… but as owner of a major NSC (National Stadium Church) franchise, I’m not placing too much stock in bonafide spirituality. Like Bakker and Swaggert before him, it’s just a matter of time before Warren is found “In flagrante delicto.”

    The more these types talk about Hell, the closer they seem to enjoy sitting to the fireplace… ifyaknow whatI’msayin’! ;)

    [email protected]

  10. Obama Selects Warren for Invocation « Much ado about… Says:

    [...] that don’t fully see America the same way as he does. Nevermind a middle ground. – - via Donklephant: This isn’t going to make gay rights activists happy. Barack Obama has selected evangelical [...]

Leave a Reply


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.

Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.

One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.

Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.

Related Posts: