(ANP VIDEO) Did Mormons Go Too Far With Prop 8?

By American News Project | Related entries in Gay Marriage, General Politics, Proposition 8, Video

Does new evidence incriminate the Mormon Church’s involvement with Proposition 8?

This is Steven Greenstreet with American News Project.

Activists claim that money from the Mormon Church was the deciding factor in passing Proposition 8 in California – banning gay marriage. The church claims to have only spent a few thousand dollars on the campaign, but ANP has uncovered evidence that may expose a gaping hole in that claim. Also, the IRS forbids religious organizations from “substantially” lobbying for political legislation. But, since the IRS does not define what “substantial” means, how is anyone to know just how much was too much?


This entry was posted on Wednesday, January 14th, 2009 and is filed under Gay Marriage, General Politics, Proposition 8, Video. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “(ANP VIDEO) Did Mormons Go Too Far With Prop 8?”

  1. Did Mormons Go Too Far With Prop 8? » Blog Archive » DHADM Says:

    [...] this on Donklephant, banner above, and thought it might be an interesting viewing of how the separation of church and [...]

  2. kranky kritter Says:

    We can easily skip all the specific sturm and drang about gay marriage and the mormons and take the quick and easy ride all the way down the slope.

    All that’s necessary is to just end tax-exempt status for all churches. Tax them like other entities, and give them a deduction for all qualifying concrete charitable work like feeding poor people and providing low-cost education.

    And anyone who contributes to a church? No tax deduction unless it’s earmarked to a deductible program like the church’s school or soup kitchen.

    Problem solved. I’m sure all the struggling towns nationwide will delight in the extra property taxes. No more brokering for in-kind donations.

    Of course that would mean that clergymen nationwide would be able to freely express their views on the character of local politicians. So it could never pass.

  3. getaclue Says:

    Not saying I completely disagree, but as stated your proposal violates the establishment clause. What is needed, for sure, is an IRS staffed with competent and honest tax examiners who have the balls to take churches to task when THEY cross the line between church and state.

    Last time I looked, lobbying/campaigning to impose your view through legislation was waaay over the line.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: