$838B Stimulus Package Clears Senate

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Barack, Democrats, Economic recovery, Legislation, recession, Republicans, Stimulus

The vote was 61-37, and the procedural vote yesterday made this margin all but certain.

But this doesn’t mean it’s all sewn up. There’s still some debate to be had.

Politico digs into the specifics…

—Both House and Senate bills provide close to $87 billion in increased federal aid to help states meet their healthcare bills under Medicaid. But the House bill is much more tilted in favor of larger urban states, which have experienced the greatest increase in unemployment, while the Senate bill takes a more across-the-board approach that helps rural states.

—The Senate bill is more tilted toward tax breaks, including a $15,000 homebuyers’ tax credit that has proven more costly than first advertised and seems sure to face challenges in the negotiations. Senators also used their bill to address the perennial problem of protecting middle and upper middle income families from the alternative minimum tax –an issue that House fiscal conservatives argue should be dealt with separately.

—State and local aid is a major part of both bills, but the final round of cuts imposed by Republican moderates fell heavily on these accounts, including a $40 billion cut from the a state fiscal stabilization initiate favored by Obama.

–The school construction issue remains a ticklish one since it was a cut that both Collins and Specter insisted upon in the negotiations. At the White House Monday, Obama defended the proposal, saying it would generate construction jobs and be a long term commitment to education important to the economy, In fact, the New Deal saw like-minded investments in local schools. But Collins and Specter argued that in today’s environment, it represents a new federal role in public schools and ought to be debated outside of the stimulus debate.

My thought is that the current bill will simply not change much because the cuts that happened were necessary to move this legislation forward. If the states need more money in the future, I’m sure that’ll be something the administration will address, but for now the important part is getting some forward movement.

More as it develops…


This entry was posted on Tuesday, February 10th, 2009 and is filed under Barack, Democrats, Economic recovery, Legislation, recession, Republicans, Stimulus. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “$838B Stimulus Package Clears Senate”

  1. Rich Says:

    “$838B Stimulus Package Clears Senate”…..

    and the stock market plunges nearly 400 points!!

    How’s that for “economic stimulation”?!?

  2. Mario Piperni Says:

    Hey Rich, I hope you’re kidding? Did you expect the stimulus package would save the economy simply by passing through the Senate? Even once it becomes law, it’s going to take months to start taking effect and years before the economy will begin to fully recover.

    It’s not a simple headache which the economy has got going here…it’s a serious disease and it’s not going to get better by popping a couple of tylenol. There’s serious surgery in the works and the recovery is going to take time. Simplistic takes on moment by moment circumstances isn’t helpful.

  3. Jim S Says:

    Actually, from what I have been reading the stock market problems seem to be more closely related to Geithner’s proposals for the banks. I think they’re unhappy that while he’s giving them more breaks than pretty much anyone thinks they should get it’s not getting everything they want.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: