Stress Tests Show Banks Need Additional $75B

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Bailouts, Banks, Money

I don’t think think this comes as a huge surprise, and it’s certainly disheartening.

From Wash Post:

The government signaled yesterday that its financial rescue efforts may have reached their high-water mark, announcing that the much-anticipated “stress tests” of 19 large banks showed that only one, GMAC, was likely to need additional taxpayer aid and that it would begin to unwind assistance for the healthiest firms.

Despite a deepening recession and projections that banks will continue to lose money, the government will require the firms to increase their combined capital by as little as $9.5 billion. The government will require the banks to further strengthen their capacity to absorb losses by adding $74.6 billion to the portion of their capital that comes from common equity. Banks are likely to raise some of that money from investors and some by converting other forms of capital.

The announcement at the Treasury Department yesterday culminated a three-month process designed to show that banks are returning to health after a crisis that left much of the industry dependent on federal aid.

Officials said that banks continue to hold vast quantities of ill-considered loans and could suffer losses totaling $600 billion over the next 20 months as the borrowers default. But in showing that the banks can absorb those losses, the administration hopes to restore investors’ confidence. If banks can start raising money again, they can increase lending to consumers and small businesses, a critical piece in the government’s broader strategy for renewing economic growth.

So that’s the bad news. But the good news is that healthy banks will begin repaying the money the federal government gave them…

Nine of the 19 banks were found to have sufficient capital reserves. Firms that repay the government no longer face restrictions on executive compensation.

Applicants will first be required to show that they do not need the shelter of a Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. program that helps banks raise money at lower interest rates. But banks may continue borrowing from the Federal Reserve’s emergency programs, which do not impose pay restrictions.

More as it develops…

This entry was posted on Friday, May 8th, 2009 and is filed under Bailouts, Banks, Money. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “Stress Tests Show Banks Need Additional $75B”

  1. John Milligan Says:

    Can’t wait til somebody suggests we stress test the Federal Government Fiscal picture. With $55 Trillion and growing in unfunded mandates and growing, it might make Bernie Madoff and the Banks look pretty tame!

  2. the Word Says:

    Not to put too fine a point on it but when was the last time we didn’t have a deficit? Wouldn’t that mean we have consistently not had the funding for our spending? I find that my conservative friends have told me that deficits don’t matter when there is a Republican in office and they matter when it’s a Democrat. Which is it this time? Hard to keep track.

Leave a Reply


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.

Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.

One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.

Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.

Related Posts: