Obama Hasn’t Deviated Much From Bush National Security Policies

By Alan Stewart Carl | Related entries in Bush, National Security, Terrorism

null

So, Dick Cheney has been going around telling everyone that President Obama is making us less safe by daring to change some of the Bush era national security policies. But Jack Goldsmith at The New Republic says Cheney’s criticisms don’t hold up. Obama has actually changed very little outside rhetoric and packaging.

Goldsmith details eleven policy areas and explains how Obama has maintained or deviated from the Bush positions. The article is well worth the read and paints Obama as exceedingly cautious about changing the ways the Bush administration was handling the war and terrorism during the final years of the Bush presidency. Obama may be speaking more softly but he’s still carrying a big stick.


This entry was posted on Tuesday, May 19th, 2009 and is filed under Bush, National Security, Terrorism. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “Obama Hasn’t Deviated Much From Bush National Security Policies”

  1. kranky kritter Says:

    I called this one. I spent all of last year saying that when all was said and done our foreign policy would not change very much. It’s basically the same show. The packaging is different. The spotlights are placed on different actors to emphasize different parts of the drama. The script? Few if any changes.

    Has Guantanamo closed yet, folks?

  2. wj Says:

    Perhaps, for Cheney, the arrogant rhetoric is a critical part of national security policy. With that, and torture, gone, he could feel that things are not at all the same, even though others can see very little change in policy.

  3. Booker Rising Says:

    Alan Stewart Carl: “Obama Hasn’t Deviated Much Fro…

    Former Vice President Dick Cheney should saying that President Obama is making USA unsafe, argues the moderate: “So, Dick Cheney has been going around telling everyone that President Obama is making us less safe by daring to change some of the Bush e….

  4. Chris Says:

    Well a point to bring up is that congress just axed money the pres wanted to close the G. But, I knew that this would happen and i still voted for him. Know why? Because 1. I thought he would do better with the economy and 2. there was no way i was voting for mccain with palin on the ticket.

    He’s nowhere as liberal as I would like, and most other “liberals” if you can call us that.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: