Dwight Eisenhower: Another Bower In Chief

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Comedy, History

To Charles De Gaulle…



To the wife of Italian Prime Minister Giovanni Gronchi…



To Pope John XXIII…



Maybe he just liked to sneak a peek at their shoes?

(h/t: Gaucho Politico & Lawyers, Guns & Money)


This entry was posted on Sunday, November 15th, 2009 and is filed under Comedy, History. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

12 Responses to “Dwight Eisenhower: Another Bower In Chief”

  1. Alistair Says:

    WOW!! Justin you’re simply the best man!

  2. Doug Mataconis Says:

    Of course, there’s a difference in both intent and interpretation between the type of bow we saw from Ike and the full from-the-waist bow that someone told Obama it was okay to display before Akihito.

    And the meaning of bows in Japanese society is far different from what it means in the West.

    Is this the biggest deal in the world ? No.

    Is it offensive to everything America stands for any President to bow in an obsequious manner to royalty ? Yes

  3. Mike A. Says:

    “Is it offensive to everything America stands for any President to bow in an obsequious manner to royalty ? Yes”

    Everything your America stands for. Don’t speak for my America.

  4. Justin Gardner Says:

    Now we’re arguing different types of bows? Come on…

    It isn’t a big deal at all. And that’s the point of this post. It happens ALL THE TIME between leaders of different countries.

    Also, let’s get one thing straight…it’s offensive to you. It’s not offensive in general.

  5. jacob Says:

    Doug:

    Is it offensive to everything America stands for any President to bow in an obsequious manner to royalty ?

    Everybody’s got something that “offends everything America stands for”. For some it’s illegally wiretapping American citizens, or government-sanctioned torture, for others it’s public health care. My pet peeve is people that wear (or otherwise disrespect) the American flag in vacuous displays of patriotism.

    Either way, I respectfully disagree with “obsequious manner”.

    My not-sarcastic question is this: Do you really think the monarchs of the world will see this bow and try to make us their bitches?

    It seems so terribly 18th century.

  6. michael reynolds Says:

    Remember when the GOP was the Party of Ideas? Now it’s the Ministry of Funny Bows.

    A brain-dead party obsessing over nonsense.

  7. Marvin Says:

    Didn’t the right wing loons already have a hissy fit earlier in the year about some bow Obama did? WTF is wrong with these people?

  8. the Word Says:

    I guess ugly is in the eye of the beholder Doug “to my eyes” offensive to everything America stands for” are the type of campaigns and the level of debate of the right wing. Elevating silly to a place of respect in a morally bankrupt party.

  9. Frank Hagan Says:

    A bow in Asia is a sign of respect, and I’m not sure why its such a big deal (beyond the normal partisan “derangement syndrome” where any perceived fault is magnified a million times).

    I did think it was funny that President Obama would bow to a Saudi; my understanding is that bowing to rulers is not a custom in Muslim countries due to the equality of all (men) under Islam. I think you are supposed to show friendship and respect by holding their hands, a practice that set the left off when Bush did it.

  10. zsingerb Says:

    Here’s the thing about the bow. If both parties bow equally, at the same time, it’s a sign of respect. If one bows lower than the other, it’s a sign of subservience. I doubt the Emperor bowed to Obama. Obviously he did not do it at the same time. Thus, Obama was showing his, and America’s subservience. This disrespects us, the citizens of the United States. Clear enough? And this protocol, like many things, causes friction and wars. Those who think it is not important also probably don’t support other social conventions. It is these conventions that allow differing societies to get along without killing each other. Raw honesty doesn’t.

  11. Jason L. Says:

    Hmmmm….

    Pobe Benedict and the Italian PM’s wife are also both bowing to Ike at the same time. I guess he is respnding in kind….and who’s t osay DeGaulle DIDN’T bow to Ike first or later? Seeing that the Japanese Emperor didn’t, and neither did King Abdullah, it makes quite a contrast to these “smoking gun” fotos…doesn’t it?

  12. Josh Says:

    “Here’s the thing about the bow…This disrespects us, the citizens of the United States. Clear enough? And this protocol, like many things, causes friction and wars.”

    Wars caused by a Democrat bowing (but not a Republican) … is totally absurd.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: