The Radical Iran

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Foreign Policy, The War On Terrorism, The World

Members within Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s own party are trying to contain his radical ways.

The AP has more:

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) – Critics say the 1980s-style radicalism of ultraconservative President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is hurting Iran at home and abroad – to the point that even his natural allies in parliament have rejected his three choices to run the all-important oil ministry.

The Islamic hard-liner appears undeterred, but pragmatists in the ruling hierarchy are growing restless and looking for ways to contain him.

“Ahmadinejad’s behavior has annoyed many fellow conservatives. That he doesn’t like to consult with anybody outside his small circle of old friends is a reality,” said Ghodratollah Rahmani, a conservative writer.

“He doesn’t consult even with knowledgeable people in his own camp.”

Even extremists within the hard-line camp want Ahmadinejad to be more responsive to their advice.

This can’t mean good news for democracy in the country. As the article mentioned, even extremists want him to calm down.

Jeezus, this can’t be good for freedom…


This entry was posted on Monday, November 28th, 2005 and is filed under Foreign Policy, The War On Terrorism, The World. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

7 Responses to “The Radical Iran”

  1. BrianOfAtlanta Says:

    I would be much more concerned if the hard liners were lining up behind him. Iran is a mess politically these days, but why are these developments bad news? Iran’s government gives much too much power to the presidency, but we’ve known this for years. Seems to me we should be thankful that Iran’s government is implementing its own internal checks and balances, feeble though they may be.

  2. Justin Gardner Says:

    Seems to me we should be thankful that Iran’s government is implementing its own internal checks and balances, feeble though they may be.

    Well sure, but what does it say about the electorate? And how have our policies effected the power grabs of hardliners like these? It occurs to me that people in neighboring Islamic countries seem more and more nervous at the prospect of being invaded, so they’re voting guys like this in to protect them.

    An unfortunate side effect from the WOT?

  3. Leon Says:

    What we are seeing in Iran is an attemp by the pro revelutionaries to continue the revolutionary ides of “Khomeini”. The revolutinary gaurds, the Cleric appointed supreme council, and the President. It started with the voting in of the last president by the people for a relaxation of some of the strictures put on them since the revolution to be governed more domacratically. This made the governmental institution is Iran afraid that he country was being taken over by more moderate aspects politically who wanted a greater relationship with the west. The ones in power in Iran is making changes to keep a hold on their positions of power in the country. So now there’s a purge of moderate politicians and reformers being fired and pulled from postions of change.Iran has always wanted to be a major if not the major force in the middleeast. Besides the nuclear issues, there’s also Irans intentions on the country it borders ….Iraq. Both countries have a large and dominate population of Shites. For Iraq to become weakened and left alone at this time would be disastrous.

  4. probligo Says:

    “Besides the nuclear issues, there’s also Irans intentions on the country it borders ….Iraq. Both countries have a large and dominate population of Shites. For Iraq to become weakened and left alone at this time would be disastrous”

    Right idea, wrong song.

    Iraq and Iran will end up together, I am convinced of that. Not as a military takeover. That would be stupid.

    It will come, after the US leaves, as the Iraqi government starts to show its true colours; as the Kurds demands for their homeland get more strident and demanding. It will come, twin sister Shia states.

    How come? Take a look through the bio’s of the leading lights in Iraq’s current puppet show…

  5. Justin Gardner Says:

    It will come, after the US leaves, as the Iraqi government starts to show its true colours; as the Kurds demands for their homeland get more strident and demanding. It will come, twin sister Shia states.

    How come? Take a look through the bio’s of the leading lights in Iraq’s current puppet show…

    This is certainly my concern.

    What could be seen as “progress” in some circles is not in my estimation…

  6. fha com Says:

    fha com…

    seventeenth propellant typing rigging warrants …

  7. Jeremy Says:

    Truth is we don’t know what the hell is going to happen. We’ve got all sorts of ideas but we just don’t know. One thing is for sure, the Middle-East is in worse
    shape than it was before we decided to play “Occupy Iraq.”

    I hope one very important lesson is learned from this stain of a war, and that is just because you have the quote “most powerful military” in the world and lots of American dollars to throw at any problem that arises it doesn’t buy us a solution. This is why you don’t elect presidents for their corporate ties, i.e. Bush. Because once they obtain the reigns of power they treat our government like a shareholder’s meeting.

    America needs money like any other nation but money should not BE America. This country has become nothing more than another means to obtain money. When this planet is near death, which, let me assure you, isn’t too far away now, Money isn’t going to buy us sh.it!

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: