I Want To See David Brooks’ Psychoanalytic Data

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in General Politics, Science

Hey, if he has the proof that liberal blogs are Stalinistic…let’s see the metrics:

DAVID BROOKS: Whoever the Democratic candidate, that is the weakness of the Democratic party, they’ve got the blogs and the netroots who are semi-nuts and they insist on a Stalinist line of discipline.

CHRIS MATTHEWS: I love your objectivity.

DAVID BROOKS: It’s objectively true. I did a psychoanalytic test.

And no, I’m not being coy. I want to see it. When you make a statement as broad as that and call it objective, you better have some serious data to back it up.

So David, let’s see it.

(h/t: Think Progress)


This entry was posted on Monday, February 13th, 2006 and is filed under General Politics, Science. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

5 Responses to “I Want To See David Brooks’ Psychoanalytic Data”

  1. reader_iam Says:

    What the–???

    (Smelling own breath) Nope, haven’t started drinking yet; I must be reading right.

    Gobsmacking. Communications from cloud-cuckoo land, or what? (Sorry, I just do not know what else to say. Maybe Brooks needs a break; I know he has a brain, but maybe it’s overworked just now.)

  2. Brian in MA Says:

    My recommendations to prove this theory are to go to the DailyKos, try posting pro-republican or pro-conservative in any way, and see what kind of “tolerant, progressive, open-minded” message you get.

    You don’t need psychoanalytic data to determine some blogs out there are nutbars.

  3. Justin Gardner Says:

    Hey, some Daily KOSers may indeed be lockstep, but that doesn’t mean all of them are.

    Again, I want to see Brooks’ data.

  4. Ryan Says:

    “My recommendations to prove this theory are to go to the DailyKos, try posting pro-republican or pro-conservative in any way, and see what kind of “tolerant, progressive, open-mindedâ€Â? message you get.”

    In that case, you might as well say the same thing with only one or two words changed about the Republicans and their lock step blogs.

  5. pills for hunger control Says:

    pills for hunger control…

    latterly Ibsen bookcases …

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: