Gas: Taking A Page From Democrats’ Playbook

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Economy, Good Decisions

Gas is getting up there. Way up there. And that has some leading Republicans abandoning their “free market” ideology in favor questioning why the gas companies’ profits are going through the roof at the same time prices are too. After all, shouldn’t they be feeling the pinch too?

From the Wash Post:

House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) and Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) are preparing to send a letter to the president Monday asking him to direct the Federal Trade Commission and Justice Department to investigate alleged price gouging and instruct the Environmental Protection Agency to issue waivers that might make it easier for oil refiners to produce adequate gasoline supplies, Hastert spokesman Ron Bonjean said.

Hastert and Frist’s letter comes amid charges by some consumer groups and Democrats that oil companies have manipulated refineries and oil inventories to drive up prices. Hastert also took aim at the rich pay package for Exxon Mobil Corp.’s retired chief executive, which he called “unconscionable.”

A Republican saying that a CEO’s salary package is “unconscionable”? Wow. Pardon me if I didn’t think I’d see the day when our current Republican leadership would utter those words. But hey, I’m certainly glad to see it. Capitalism is an amoral system and needs to be put in check every once in a while. This latest energy crisis, not to mention the looming one with Iran, demands higher scrutiny, more accountability and real answers. Otherwise, my guess is that $5 gas is right around the corner.


This entry was posted on Saturday, April 22nd, 2006 and is filed under Economy, Good Decisions. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

12 Responses to “Gas: Taking A Page From Democrats’ Playbook”

  1. Gun-Toting Liberal Says:

    And Dems are sounding more like Republikkons… RepubliKKON spending has been so high, even the liberals are offended by the large Government ideas of the so-called “Conservatives”. Fiscal responsibility? Go LEFT

  2. Kim Ritter Says:

    Maybe Ralph Nader was right when he said that there was no difference between the two parties any more. I am cynical about this because Oil execs. have already testified in the Senate twice this year about collusion on gas prices and manipulation of supply, and to what avail? Just seems like election year pandering to show that Republicans DO care about consumers. It’s political theater, cuz why bite the hand that feeds you —(check oil company campaign contribtuons for Frist and Hastert)? To date almost no one has been successfully prosecuted for gouging.

  3. Bob Aman Says:

    I’m still not convinced that high gas prices are bad. But yeah, the whole simultaneous record profits smells rotten somehow.

  4. Bob J Young Says:

    I tried to post a comment with a bunch of information, but the spam filter snagged it.

    So I put it over on the moderate voice entry that links here. I included a bunch of links to graphs and data showing the current status of oil and gas, but the bottom line is a shortage of gas. Why that is occurring is pretty simple: demand has exceeded supply.

  5. Jim S Says:

    Nader right? If Gore had won in 2000 we still would have gone after Bid Laden and taken out the Taliban if that’s what we had to do to get to him. In fact we actually might have gotten him since we wouldn’t have had Rumsfeld in charge. But we would not be in Iraq right now. How different do the Democrats have to be to kill that idiotic meme?

  6. Pooh Says:

    Methinks Hastert is playing politics as usual – Bill Maher went so far as to say that the Exxon guy should be the “Dem’s Willie Horton” this fall. And viscerally, if you were going to draw a cartoon of a kleptocrat, you could do worse…

  7. original_mix Says:

    Yeah, it is nice to see Congress showing it cares about lowering prices at the pump, but their solution–a windfall profits tax–would only raise prices, since the oil companies will just pass that tax down to the American consumer. Can’t they come up with anything better than that?

  8. oliveewe Says:

    I am also opposed to a windfall profits tax. I admit that it’s partially selfishly based — I just don’t want to pay any more. Yet my opposition is also based on logic…a WPT is just going to be ineffective. What will it do to solve our energy problems? Our energy problems are in my opinion a result of our ever-increasing demand. Prices go up when demand goes up. Prices go down when supply increases. We must either do something to decrease our demand or increase our supply if we are to have relief.

  9. Trainer Says:

    I despise paying $3 per gallon now just like all of you do and therefore I have to oppose the WPT as well. I guarantee this tax will be passed down to the consumer they always are. Like “oliveewe” said . . . we either have to decrease demand or increase supply! That means we all have to take a hard look at our energy consumption and we need to get our leaders to find ways to open up supply. Even if it means we may need to open ANWR or the Gulf.

  10. Faisal Says:

    Why is it always us that make the sacrifices? Why can’t the government make a sacrifice and stop spending so much money on their pet projects in order to fund a comprehensive energy policy? The less we rely on Saudi Arabia and OPEC for our oil the sooner we’ll control our own fate.

  11. smith Says:

    Seems like Congress is coming up with ideas that are little more destructive than constructive. If we add taxes, we’re asking for higher prices when the cost gets passed to consumers. If we regulate prices, we are only going to interfere with the supply that we need. I’m thinking we should concentrate less on regulations/punishments for oil companies and start working on policy that lets them explore new sources and give us some more affordable product.

  12. flash Says:

    I like Kim’s description of political theater–that’s exactly right…both sides of the aisle want to “protect” consumers and it’s too hard to talk about the real reasons gas is so expensive: the cost of crude and state and federal taxes (wouldn’t want to let THAT cat out of the bag!)

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: