FEMA: We Can Rebuild It

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in General Politics, Hurricane Katrina

…but first it must be destroyed…

And after the response to Katrina, this isn’t a shock

WASHINGTON â€â€? Hurricane Katrina exposed flaws in the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Department of Homeland Security that are “too substantial to mend,” and FEMA should be dismantled and rebuilt inside the troubled department, according to the final report by Senate investigators.

The report, to be released to key senators today and to the public next week, makes 86 recommendations that would undo major changes made when President Bush and Congress launched the department in 2003, and would reverse parts of a reorganization ordered by Secretary Michael Chertoff last summer. It stops short of restoring FEMA to independent, Cabinet-level status, as many in Congress and former agency directors want, but would promote its chief to confer directly with the president in a crisis, according to a summary released to news organizations.

Chertoff is certainly looking bad in all of this. I wonder if he’s going to be stepping down soon? Most likely not.

Still, when Republican leaders say the following, you can’t help but wonder if Chertoff should be given the boot…

“We have concluded that FEMA is in shambles and beyond repair, and that it should be abolished,” Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said in a written statement released by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, which she chairs. The committee held 22 hearings, interviewed more than 320 people and reviewed more than 838,000 pages of documents.

I’m glad to see the Senate taking drastic steps to fix this problem. Our people deserve no less.

This entry was posted on Friday, April 28th, 2006 and is filed under General Politics, Hurricane Katrina. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

5 Responses to “FEMA: We Can Rebuild It”

  1. reader_iam Says:

    The “funny” thing is, FEMA used to be government agency with a better-than-average (I’m understating) reputation.

    Is reinvention or recreation called for here?

    That’s a distinction with a difference, in this case, I’m thinking.

  2. reader_iam Says:

    Which means that destroying, per se–depending on what’s meant by that–may not be the issue.

    With regards to DHA, on the other hand … .

  3. reader_iam Says:

    Sorry, that should be “DHS.”

    I’d like to see FEMA separate again, but I understand that reasonable disagree–and I’m more than willing to concede, as long as we’re outcomes-based, in this instance, rather than process-based.

  4. Justin Gardner Says:

    I’d like to see FEMA separate again too. I think this is a positive step.

  5. BrianOfAtlanta Says:

    I think FEMA needs to be separated from DHS, but they do seem to have a problem with really big disasters like Katrina or Andrew back in 1992.

Leave a Reply


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.

Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.

One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.

Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.

Related Posts: