Schwarzenegger To Pimp Centrism In ’08

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Elections

Apparently he’s pushing the “moderate” meme for the Republican side, which could bode well for guys like Giuliani.

From the LA Times:

Fresh off a smashing reelection victory, the governor and his political team are hoping Schwarzenegger’s outsized persona and bipartisan achievements in Sacramento can translate into a substantial role in the next White House contest, especially on the Republican side.

“When you have a Republican who won a large victory in a Democrat state in a very Democrat year, clearly he’s identifying issues that represent what many voters are concerned about,” said Adam Mendelsohn, the governor’s communications chief.

Or, as Schwarzenegger said in a recent interview, referring to himself and his Democratic chums in the Legislature: “We could be a model for the rest of the nation.”

Yes, they could be a model for the rest of the nation, but California is a Dem stronghold and Arnold is most definitely a RINO. I guess my point/question is…will centrism work for Republicans on a nationwide scale? And, have they screwed themselves with the politics of division?

After all, if the evangelicals stay home, there’s no way a Republican is going to get the presidency. And if a Republican wants to pull votes from the middle it’ll be because they don’t try to inflame the passions of the far right.

I don’t know…what do you think? Will Republicans be willing to come back towards the middle? Can they do it in such a short period of time?

UDPATE:
Meanwhile, Romney is pushing for a gay-marriage ban in Mass.

Something tells me Schwarzenegger will not be pleased.


This entry was posted on Monday, November 20th, 2006 and is filed under Elections. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

8 Responses to “Schwarzenegger To Pimp Centrism In ’08”

  1. Heather Says:

    Ahnold isn’t really a RINO in my estimation. He IS a Centrist FisCon and SocLib. He’s also done a lot to pull California away from the brink of bankruptcy – in spite of the shrieking lefties.

  2. Paul Silver Says:

    It would be nice to see him team up with Mayor Bloomberg to nurture moderate Republicans. There are many districts in the country where only a republican can get elected. If the Dems screw up and power swings back the other way it would be nice to have a receptive moderate counterpart.

  3. Justin Gardner Says:

    I like him. He started out hacky, but he’s ended up in a very good place and I think he could potential be a leader for the moderate movement.

    I guess we’ll see.

  4. sleipner Says:

    Frankly I suspect that now Schwarzenegger’s won the election he’ll go right back to the right wing hackery with which he started his first term. The only reason he moderated his positions at all was political expediency – he realized he would be fired despite his mass media popularity if he kept flouting the will of the people.

    I do think that Giuliani is the Republicans’ best candidate to date, mostly because McCain has made a fool of himself pimping issues he used to have integrity about to try to make himself look more Republican. Not to mention he’s way too old to last as president…I dread another senile Reagan figurehead.

  5. wj Says:

    Watching Schwarzeneger from within California, I think he found his adventure with the right wing a learning experience. It looked like he was basically moderate on most issues (certainly way too moderate to win a Republican primary in California, except as an incumbant), but got convinced by the California Republican establishment that the way to go was to jog right. Well, we all saw how that worked out — badly. And going back towards the center got him easily reelected.

    So I think he has decided to stick with the moderate approach. (Especially since he has a massively Democratic legislature to deal with, and the special-election/mass appeal approach was a disaster.) And he looks like he is much more comfortable in the center anyway.

  6. sleipner Says:

    I certainly hope you’re right, wj. I imagine that his wife makes his life far more comfortable when he’s at least moderate than when he’s drifting to the right in any case.

  7. Pete Abel Says:

    Listen to Arnold tell his personal story of why he first identified himself as a Republican — it’s because he didn’t like the intrustive Socialists of his country of origin. When he came to the USA, heard that Republicans basically stood for individualism/individual liberties — and keeping Government’s nose out of our individual lives — he said, and I paraphase, “That’s me. I’m a Republican.”

    Granted, today’s Republican Party doesn’t resemble any of that. In fact, if the R’s had staid true to their heritage and to the reasons why Arnold and I and so many others signed on the dotted line so many years ago, we’d be living in a world where the Republican party supported gay marriage and abortion, a world where the GOP would never — not in a gazillion years — touch something like the Schiavo case.

    So is Arnold’s move a move back to the Center? Or is it simply a move back to the basics of what he has always personally and passionately believed, i.e., Government can do a lot of good, but it must stop short of intruding on our individual freedom to choose the lives we will lead, as long as those lives don’t harm our fellow citizens.

    That’s what Arnold’s about.

  8. Wendy Says:

    Arnold is a very strange person, sometimes I really get surprised by his statements and comments. But it is true that he came a long way from Mr.Olympia and Connan to where he is now. Respect for that.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: