Brownback’s Iraq Plan

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in 2008 Election, War

I’ve nearly always liked this scenario, but I don’t think it’s feasible, especially with the current climate of “stay the course” or “let’s get out now!”

From the AP:

Kansas Senator Sam Brownback says Iraq should be divided into three sectarian-based states to halt the war.

The Republican presidential candidate says Iraq would remain one country, with a weak central government in Baghdad. Kurds, Sunnis and Shiites would have their own states and equally share the nation’s oil revenue.

Brownback says his plan would reduce sectarian violence and allow Iraqis to take over security, pulling U-S troops out of harm’s way.

New York Sun has more about the presidential dark horse and his changing Iraq war views.


This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 20th, 2007 and is filed under 2008 Election, War. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “Brownback’s Iraq Plan”

  1. bob in fl Says:

    I’ve been saying that for years. Nothing new here. But nobody listens to me. And why should they? I’m just anothre guy ion the street. Could be worse: I could be living on it.

    By the By. this is the only blog I go back later on to view other’s answers. Thanks, Justin, for keeping the blog free of the usual name calling clutter.

  2. nykrindc Says:

    This is also Joe Biden’s plan, though he provides far more detail and an actual strategy to carry it out. As I argued in my review of the Biden plan, there are a few questions that I have about it, mainly with regard to its feasibility in terms of separating mixed regions without the attendant bloodshed. I also question the assumption made by both Brownback and Biden that militias such as the Mahdi army would just sit tight and watch Kirkuk (where they have a significant presence) become part of any Kurdish region. To be fair, Biden calls for these mixed cities to be federally administered, but the question still remains as to whether the Kurds could accept such a compromise.

    I also have other problems with his plan, particularly with his call to redeploy most of out troops out of Iraq while implementing the new strategy, mainly because I think in the short term to be able to carry it out, we would need far more troops than we currently have. In any case, the my full post on Sen. Biden’s partition of Iraq is here if you are interested.

  3. Tom Says:

    Forgive me, but doesn’t Iraq have a government that we already recognize? So we’re just going to waltz in there and say – hey guys, we’re splitting up your country. You don’t mind, right?

    Shouldn’t they be the ones making that decision?

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: