White House e-mails deleted

By Sean Aqui | Related entries in General Politics, News, Partisan Hacks

You know that brewing scandal over White House use of RNC e-mail addresses?

Well, it just got a lot, lot bigger:

Countless e-mails to and from many key White House staffers have been deleted — lost to history and placed out of reach of congressional subpoenas — due to a brazen violation of internal White House policy that was allowed to continue for more than six years, the White House acknowledged yesterday.

The problem:

Until 2004, all e-mail on RNC accounts was routinely deleted after 30 days. Since 2004, White House staffers using those accounts have been able to save their e-mail indefinitely — but have also been able to delete whatever they felt like deleting. By comparison, the White House e-mail system preserves absolutely everything forever, in accordance with the Presidential Records Act.

The part that will have administration critics salivating:

The leading culprit appears to be President Bush’s enormously influential political adviser Karl Rove, who reportedly used his Republican National Committee-provided Blackberry and e-mail accounts for most of his electronic communication.

Now one could argue that the problem, while real, was inadvertent, not done with evil intent. And I’m sure the familiar sight of administration incompetence partly explains the problem.

But it stretches credibility to think that someone as highly placed as Rove would not have understood the very clear White House rules governing e-mail:

“Federal law requires the preservation of electronic communications sent or received by White House staff,” says the handbook that all staffers are given and expected to read and comply with.

“As a result, personnel working on behalf of the EOP [Executive Office of the President] are expected to only use government-provided e-mail services for all official communication.”

The handbook further explains: “The official EOP e-mail system is designed to automatically comply with records management requirements.”

And if that wasn’t clear enough, the handbook notes — as was the case in the Clinton administration — that “commercial or free e-mail sites and chat rooms are blocked from the EOP network to help staff members ensure compliance and to prevent the circumvention of the records management requirements.”

So we’re left with three possible explanations:

1. Karl Rove is an idiot;

2. Karl Rove thought the rules didn’t apply to him;

3. Karl Rove deliberately circumvented the records laws.

The answer, for now, appears to be #2:

For Rove, a noted Blackberry addict who holds the position of senior adviser and deputy chief of staff, that would have meant switching from one device to another when alternating from White House business to Republican party business. Apparently he didn’t bother.

I wrote in my earlier post that as a blogger with multiple e-mail accounts, I can understand how staffers could have inadvertently used the wrong account on occasion. But this isn’t inadvertent misuse; this is blatant disregard for the rules.

And it’s not just Rove. Fifty White House staffers were issued RNC communications gear, and apparently many of them also used the RNC gear for official business and improperly deleted messages.

And in classic Bush administration fashion, it’s nobody’s fault:

So is anyone in trouble? Apparently not. Stanzel was careful to apportion blame widely and generically. “This issue is not the fault of one individual,” he said. He refused even to acknowledge that it is the White House counsel’s office that is responsible for the establishment and oversight of internal rules of conduct. The White House counsel during Bush’s entire first term, of course, was Alberto Gonzales, now the embattled attorney general.

There’s more. Read the whole thing. And check out the related coverage. Particularly note the case of Rove aide Susan Ralston, who deliberately used RNC accounts to communicate with Jack Abramoff. And if you want another indication that the White House was fully aware of the situation and that transgressions were not inadvertent, read this:

In another e-mail exchange revealed during the investigation of disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff, a White House official was described as warning that “it is better to not put this stuff in writing in [the White House] . . . email system because it might actually limit what they can do to help us, especially since there could be lawsuits, etc.” Abramoff responded in an e-mail that the message in question “was not supposed to go into the WH system.”

It’s hard to read that as anything other than a deliberate circumvention of the law. The Democrats are going to have a field day. And deservedly so.


This entry was posted on Thursday, April 12th, 2007 and is filed under General Politics, News, Partisan Hacks. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

9 Responses to “White House e-mails deleted”

  1. Justin Gardner Says:

    Rove has been so poisonous for the GOP. They’re going to feel the after effects from his shady operational philosophy for many years to come.

  2. Where There is Smoke There is a Forest Fire « Michael P.F. van der Galiën Says:

    [...] Wrong. This is outrageous. Justin Garnder concludes: 1. Karl Rove is an idiot; [...]

  3. bob in fl Says:

    Why don’t we just say that Karl Rove is an idiot who believes the rules are not made for him, so he deliberately broke the law to eliminate future evidence that could be used against him & others.

    As far as Gonzales goes, sounds like he waited too long to resign. & it sounds like a prison term is in his future – oh, I forgot – a pardon is in his future.

  4. daveinboca Says:

    With intemperate imbeciles like Leahy lurching around with authority to subpoena, I don’t mind that much of such a loss to history! Marble-mouth will froth on for a while about this. I think Dick Cheney summed him up well, though Cheney himself is no prize. Takes one to know one!

  5. bob in fl Says:

    And it just got bigger yet. I hope the link works. From Kevin Drum’s Political Animal:

    MISSING EMAILS UPDATE….Remember all those missing emails the White House told us about yesterday? Turns out the RNC does have copies on its servers. Whew. Apparently, back in 2004, as part of the Valerie Plame investigation, Patrick Fitzgerald told them to stop deleting emails.

    So they did. Except, it turns out, for Karl Rove’s emails, many of which are still missing. Now that’s just plain peculiar, isn’t it?

    Luckily, I’m sure the RNC has backup tapes. Right? Everyone keeps backup tapes, don’t they?
    �Kevin Drum 5:37 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (24)

    OK, the link doesn’t work. Kevin’s source was tpmmuckraker.com. Check it out.

  6. The Gun Toting Liberalâ„¢ Says:

    [...] Other Bloggers Weigh In (roundup courtesy of MemeOrandum): NewsHog; The Carpetbagger Report; The Anonymous Liberal; Talk Left; The Washington Monthly (Political Animal); Hullabaloo (digby); Donklephant; The Impolitic; Michael P.F. van der Galiën; Firedoglake; Mother Jones; Think Progress; Crooks and Liars; Daily Kos; The Drudge Retort; The Left Coaster; Technorati Tags:  Alberto Gonzales, Arlen Specter, Attorney Firings, Bush, Congress, Constitution, Corruption, Current Events, Emails, GOP, Headline News, Headlines, Henry Waxman, Karl Rove, News, News and Politics, Patrick Leahy, Pipes And Tubes, Politics, President Bush, Rants, Republicans, RNC, Senate, Ted Stevens [...]

  7. Jim S Says:

    Yeah, daveinboca, as long as the WH is in Republican hands they should be able to do anything they want, no questions asked. Law? They’re above the stinking law…at least as long as there are any Democrats involved in enforcing it or doing any investigating.

    What a sad excuse for an American citizen you are. Great Republican partisan but crappy citizen.

  8. joe Says:

    blackberry downout due to rove controversy

  9. xiaoxinwow Says:

    Welcome to our website for you World of Warcraft Gold,Wow Gold,Cheap World of Warcraft Gold,cheap wow gold,buy cheap wow gold,real wow gold,sell wow gold, …
    Here wow gold of 1000 gold at $68.99-$80.99 ,World Of Warcraft Gold,buy wow gold,sell world of warcraft gold(wow gold),buy euro gold wow Cheap wow gold,cheapest wow gold store … buy euro gold wow wow gold–buy cheap wow gold,sell wow gold.welcome to buy cheap wow gold–buy wow gold cheap, easy, wow gold purchasing.World of Warcraft,wow gold Super …
    We can have your wow gold,buy wow gold,wow gold game,world of warcraft gold, wow Gold Cheap wow, Cheap wow gold,world of warcraft gold deal,Cheap WOW Gold …

    Welcome to our website for you World of Warcraft Gold,Wow Gold,Cheap World of Warcraft Gold,wow gold,buy cheap wow gold,real wow gold,sell wow gold, …
    Here wow gold of 1000 gold at $68.99-$80.99,World Of Warcraft Gold,buy wow gold,sell world of warcraft gold(wow gold),buy gold wow lightninghoof instock Cheap wow gold,cheapest wow gold store …
    wow gold–buy cheap wow gold,sell wow gold.welcome to buy cheap wow gold–cheap, easy, wow gold purchasing.World of Warcraft,wow gold Super …
    Wow gold- Gold for buy gold wow lightninghoof instock EU-Server: …wow Gold EU: starting from 84,99?; 3000 WoW Gold EU: starting from 119,99?. wow Gold- Leveling Services: …
    We can have your wow Gold,buy wow Gold,wow Gold game,wow gold, Cheap wow Gold, Cheap World of Warcraft Gold,world of warcraft gold deal,buy cheap wow gold,Cheap WOW Gold …

    Here wow Gold of 1000 gold at $68.99-$80.99,World Of Warcraft Gold,wow gold buy wow Gold,sell world of warcraft gold(wow gold),Cheap wow gold,cheapest World of Warcraft Gold store …

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: