Why Cheney Isn’t Following Executive Order

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in The War On Terrorism

One of his aides explains.

From Wash Post:

In a letter to Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.), Cheney Chief of Staff David S. Addington wrote that the order treats the vice president the same as the president and distinguishes them both from “agencies” subject to the oversight provisions of the executive order.

Addington did not cite specific language in the executive order supporting this view, and a Cheney spokeswoman could not point to such language last night. But spokeswoman Lee Anne McBride said the intent of the order, as expressed by White House officials in recent days, was “not for the VP to be separated from the president on this reporting requirement.”

Addington did not repeat a separate argument that has been previously advanced by Cheney’s office: that it is not strictly an executive branch agency but also shares legislative functions because the vice president presides over the Senate. That argument has drawn ridicule in recent days from Democrats and on late-night television.

Oh! Now I get it. Cheney is all powerful. Why didn’t you guys just say that earlier?

By the way, I’ve written about this David Addington guy before. He’s pretty much a legal maverick in his views about the power of the Executive Branch, and the following is from my post about Addington

…this strategy rests on a reading of the Constitution that few legal scholars share�namely, that the President, as Commander-in-Chief, has the authority to disregard virtually all previously known legal boundaries, if national security demands it. Under this framework, statutes prohibiting torture, secret detention, and warrantless surveillance have been set aside. A former high-ranking Administration lawyer who worked extensively on national-security issues said that the Administration’s legal positions were, to a remarkable degree, “all Addington.� Another lawyer, Richard L. Shiffrin, who until 2003 was the Pentagon’s deputy general counsel for intelligence, said that Addington was “an unopposable force.�

So let me get this straight…as long as terrorism exists, the Executive Branch can do whatever they damn well please because it can be dressed up as “in the interest of national security.” Good times.

Come on people…this defies basic logic and Addington knows it. But he, along with Cheney, have used the WoT to do things that no VP would ever dream of doing.

Very unfortuante behavior during times like these when we need to trust our leaders more than ever.


This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 27th, 2007 and is filed under The War On Terrorism. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “Why Cheney Isn’t Following Executive Order”

  1. nykrindc Says:

    Maybe I’m wrong on this, but I thought the President was complying with his own executive order! So far as i know, the only one not complying with it was Cheney.

    A bit off topic, but is it a coincidence that as I read of Cheney’s escapades the one of the Spam blocker words to submit a comment on this post is “swine”?

  2. johndoe01 Says:

    Actually, Cheney is correct that he is NOT a member of the executive branch of government and therefore is not subect to executive orders. In fact, the Vice President is not a member of any branch of government and has no actual power other than to cast a vote in the case of a tie in the senate. His only real purpose other than that is to step in if the President becomes incapacitated. He’s also not allowed to be fired by the President. So… whether what Cheney is doing is right or wrong, he is correct about the fact that he is not a member of the executive branch and therefore is not subject to executive orders.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: