A Negative Reaction to Obama’s Speech

By Alan Stewart Carl | Related entries in Barack, DNC

Most of the critiques of Barack Obama’s acceptance speech have been positive. That’s why David Broder’s opinion interested me. He thinks Obama did a poor job. In fact, Broder thinks the whole convention was a missed opportunity.

I won’t spend a lot of time summarizing Broder’s opinion. It can be basically summed up as “too many old faces and too many old ideas.” Take a moment to give it a read if you’re looking for a reasoned (rather than partisan) negative critique of Obama’s big moment.


This entry was posted on Sunday, August 31st, 2008 and is filed under Barack, DNC. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “A Negative Reaction to Obama’s Speech”

  1. Jim S Says:

    Actually I’d say that Broder is losing his touch and his non-partisanship. For the last couple of years (So far as I can remember.) his columns have consistently been pro-Republican though not rants. I can’t think of a Democrat he hasn’t panned in that time frame when he writes about them.

  2. Azhrie Says:

    Yeah I am not exactly buying him as a non-partisan this election cycle ever since the column blaming Obama for McCain going negative.

  3. berlet98 Says:

    THE HIDDEN AGENDA OF OBAMA AND McCAIN? CAN YOU SPARE AN AMERO?

    This statement will enrage some supporters of GWB and GHWB, but America hasn’t had a true American president since Ronald Reagan.

    I admit that George Herbert Walker Bush was a damned sight better choice than William Jefferson “Ah Did Not Inhale Nor Have Sex With That Woman” Clinton and that George Walker Bush was a far better pick than Albert Arnold “Incovenient Lies” Gore, Jr. and John Forbes “Swift-Boated” Heinz Kerry. Still, I have some grave doubts as to the hopes and plans of both Bushes.

    I voted for both of them and would do so again against those opponents but that is not to say that they were unequivocal America-Firsters. Bush Forty-One’s dream of a New World Order still gives me the heebie-jeebies because of its vagaries and Bush Forty-Three’s multitudinous quirks and screw-ups make me wish his daddy had taught him the value of discretion and articulation.

    One issue that has not seen much play or comment in the current campaign, much like Obama’s hidden agenda of black reparations, is an issue that I fear both Obama and McCain may agree on is the North American Union, or NAU. It’s not an edgey issue in the sense that it could divide the electorate mainly because it’s hidden from that electorate and most who have heard of the NAU believe it’s just another government road-building enterprise.

    It’s anything but “just another government road-building enterprise.”…
    (For the rest of this article, please see http://genelalor.com/.)

  4. Minisite Design Says:

    This is interesting! I’ll be visiting again for more updates on the negative reaction on Obama’s speech. Minisite Design

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: