“[T]he portrait [on "SNL"] was very dismissive of the substance of Sarah Palin, and so, in that sense, they were defining Hillary Clinton as very substantive and Sarah Palin as totally superficial,” Fiorina argued. “I think that continues the line of argument that is disrespectful in the extreme and yes, I would say, sexist, in the sense that just because Sarah Palin has different views than Hillary Clinton does not mean that she lacks substance.”
The Republicans chose to go with a “celebrity” Veep pick and they don’t understand why people don’t take Palin’s views seriously?
This entry was posted on Monday, September 15th, 2008 and is filed under Comedy, Palin, Partisan Nonsense, Republicans. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.