WSJ Looks At McCain’s Plans To Cut Medicaid/Medicare Benefits

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in 2008 Election, Health Care, McCain, Taxes

At this late in the game, revealing something like this could really hurt McCain’s support among the elderly. Because it plays directly into Obama’s message that McCain’s plans would leave people without insurance. And with McCain’s staff agreeing that an average of $130 billion a year would be cut in the next 10 years, I’m not sure he’s going to be able to convince voters otherwise. Even if he does claim that his health care policy will fill in the gaps and nobody will lose coverage.

From WSJ:

John McCain would pay for his health plan with major reductions to Medicare and Medicaid, a top aide said, in a move that independent analysts estimate could result in cuts of $1.3 trillion over 10 years to the government programs. [...]

But Douglas Holtz-Eakin, Sen. McCain’s senior policy adviser, said Sunday that the campaign has always planned to fund the tax credits, in part, with savings from Medicare and Medicaid. Those government health-care programs serve seniors, poor families and the disabled. Medicare spending for the fiscal year ended Sept. 30 is estimated at $457.5 billion. [...]

Mr. Holtz-Eakin said the plan is accurately described as budget neutral because it assumes enough savings in Medicare and Medicaid spending to make up the difference. He said the savings would come from eliminating Medicare fraud and by reforming payment policies to lower the overall cost of care. He said the new tax credits will help some low-income people avoid joining Medicaid. The campaign also proposes increasing Medicare premiums for wealthier seniors.

Personally, I think the idea that McCain wants to keep any healthcare plan “budget neutral” is preposterous. The point would be to cover all Americans, not just increase the % of people with health care. Otherwise it’s not universal health care.

I bet this comes up in tomorrow’s town hall debate.


This entry was posted on Monday, October 6th, 2008 and is filed under 2008 Election, Health Care, McCain, Taxes. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “WSJ Looks At McCain’s Plans To Cut Medicaid/Medicare Benefits”

  1. Mike Says:

    I don’t think McCain ever claimed his plan was “universal health care”.

  2. BBQ Says:

    By your definition Obama’s plan isn’t universal either since it would leave a certain percentage out too. Like Mike said McCain never claimed it was universal.

    “Tax Policy Center analysts estimated that McCain’s proposal would reduce the number of Americans who are uninsured from a projected 67 million to 65 million in a decade, while Obama’s proposal would leave 33 million people uninsured.”

    http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/581559

  3. Bob Says:

    Both plans are awful. America needs to get over the idea that there’s something wrong or evil about socialised health care. You are all being robbed so badly it defies description.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: