Pre-Debate Open Stream

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in 2008 Election, Barack, Debates, McCain

What’s on your mind tonight?

What do you want to hear?

What do you NOT want to hear?

Any predictions?

Talk!


This entry was posted on Wednesday, October 15th, 2008 and is filed under 2008 Election, Barack, Debates, McCain. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

7 Responses to “Pre-Debate Open Stream”

  1. Justin Gardner Says:

    Obama will continue to act cool, not respond harshly to any attacks and run out the clock.

    McCain has to make Obama seem unelectable. He won’t be able to. Only Obama can do that as this point.

    So Obama needs a BIG bobble tonight on the economy. And I mean HUGE.

  2. Justin Gardner Says:

    Check out these numbers…

    Illinois 500 LV, 4.5%
    Obama 56, McCain 39
    Sen: Durbin (D-i) 62, Sauerberg (R) 31

    Kansas 500 LV, 4.5%
    McCain 54, Obama 41
    Sen: Roberts (R-i) 55, Slattery (D) 36

    Massachusetts 500 LV, 4.5%
    Obama 62, McCain 34
    Sen: Kerry (D-i) 63, Beatty (R) 31

    New Mexico 700 LV, 4%
    Obama 55, McCain 42
    Sen: Udall (D) 57, Pearce (R) 37

    New Mexico is done. And Kansas is actually down to 13 points? Wow.

  3. Justin Gardner Says:

    More “great” advice for McCain from the folks over at NRO:

    What demeanor should McCain display tonight? Angry doesn’t work. Solemn doesn’t work. Fake-smiley doesn’t work. Instead, McCain should go back to his roots and unleash his inner smart-aleck. If Obama accuses him of being erratic in a crisis, he should say: “So I’m erotic in a crisis? Who knew?”

    Jeezus…

  4. 2008Central.net Says:

    For starters, how about an actual debate or something close to it. Put another way, the number one thing that tonight’s debate needs is clash. By this, I don’t mean pointless attacks. Rather, clash results when one person makes an argument for a particular position/proposition and then the other person responds to that argument.

    We haven’t really seen debates, instead, what we have been watching are dueling press conferences that are being billed as debates.

  5. Justin Gardner Says:

    Political Realm tells us to watch for these things…

    1) Will McCain bring up Ayers? He’s somewhat boxed himself in on this point. McCain signaled earlier this week that he intended to discuss Obama’s ties to the former radical, but his campaign is well aware that such aggressiveness could easily backfire.

    2) The format may also preclude McCain from attacking directly. The two candidates will be seated at a table and it will be awfully uncomfortable if McCain goes on the attack.

    3) Will Bob Schieffer bring up Ayers? If he does, it will provide some cover for McCain to push the issue, but I think most voters are so focused in on the economy at this point that they will dismiss such an effort.

    4) Is this McCain’s last chance to change the dynamics of the race? Most pundits seem to think McCain needs to somehow disqualify Obama in order to have a shot at winning. How he does that tonight, I’m not sure. I tend to think that this race is already out of McCain’s hands. Barring some kind of significant foreign policy event–another bin Laden tape, perhaps–McCain would have to run the table in the battlegrounds (nothing short of a miracle at this point) in order to win.

    5) Will McCain’s distaste for Obama continue to show tonight? His contempt has been rather obvious at the first two debates and, while it isn’t a huge deal, it certainly doesn’t help his cause.

    6) With the lead, Obama is simply hoping for no significant mistakes tonight. Having already passed the commander-in-chief test in the first two debates, a clean performance tonight could seal the deal.

  6. Justin Gardner Says:

    Rather, clash results when one person makes an argument for a particular position/proposition and then the other person responds to that argument.

    We haven’t really seen debates, instead, what we have been watching are dueling press conferences that are being billed as debates.

    Come now…that stuff still does happen. Obama engaged McCain quite a few times in the first time, most notably when he said, “You were wrong, You were wrong.”…etc.

    But if you want a debate you saw in forensics, well, those days are gone. These candidates know they have 2 minute to answer a question, so they have to make their message simple and direct. So blame the format, not the candidates.

  7. Justin Gardner Says:

    Okay, this thread is still open, but everybody will be over here.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: