House Passes Measure to Tax Bonuses

By Alan Stewart Carl | Related entries in Bailouts, House

Given all the press the AIG bonuses have garnered, you’d think our only economic problem was a few nearsighted/greedy execs at one insurance firm. Today, the House took AIG backlash to the next level by passing a bill which would levy heavy taxes on such bonuses. Specifically:

The bill would levy a 90 percent tax on bonuses paid to employees with family incomes above $250,000 at companies that have received at least $5 billion in government bailout money.

Leaving aside whether or not his is an appropriate or necessary move, the whole situation has hit the farcical stage. Our Congress hands out billions of dollars with too few strings attached and then acts shocked — shocked! — when the money is misused. Their solution, of course, is to act punitively in a show of staged populism.

All this while many larger problems go unaddressed or ignored.

While I’d like to think this fiasco will once-and-for-all stop the kind of chicken-little attitude that allows poor bills to become law, I doubt that’s the lesson everyone will take away. In fact, I have a feeling many in Congress feel the bill passed today proves they are doing their job. Except, their job was getting the legislation right the first time.


This entry was posted on Thursday, March 19th, 2009 and is filed under Bailouts, House. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

5 Responses to “House Passes Measure to Tax Bonuses”

  1. ExiledIndependent Says:

    Ridiculous populist political theater intended to assuage Americans’ anger over how the government has handled this and to distract from the government’s own role in the process. By the way, who is the mysterious person from the Treasury dept. who leaned on Dodd to include the bonus protection in the stimulus bill? Is anyone even interested in finding out? And, by the way, has anyone bothered to look at who’s campaign coffers AIG has been filling?

    I’m about to hurl.

  2. kranky kritter Says:

    I wholeheartedly agree that it would be nice if such episodes taught congressfolk not to legislate hastily.

    However, you gotta admit that congress’s apparently almost unlimited power of mulligan does make it a largely moot point. Bills like this are sort of like MS Bloatware…you release a beta version, you let the poor users find the flaws, then you do some patches. So much easier than getting it right the first time.

  3. Trescml Says:

    Although I wish that Congress used foresight instead of hindsight, they did show self preservation. I think the bigger implication of the populist uprising is that no more bailout money is going to get through Congress until after midterm elections (if then). Maybe that is a good thing, but AIG biting the hand that owns it is going to tie the hands of the Obama adminstration or cause them to be far more creative (like the trillion bucks that just got poured into the economy). The risk is the creative moves may cause unintended or bad consequences.

  4. Del Patterson Says:

    First, let’s make sure that we all understand that the bonuses were promised months ago. Second, both the Fed and the Treasury Dept signed off on the bonuses and knew full well that payment was part of contractual law and not something that was capricious.
    Angry, hell yes, put this country was based on the rule of law and not on flippant “let’s-go-get-them-and-shut-them-down”.

  5. gerryf Says:

    Not sure how to respond to this whole thing….Alan, are you saying we should be mad that congress corrected a mistake?

    I do agree that this has clouded the much larger issue, but that doesn’t mean we should ignore the greedy excess (or frankly casual indfference) of AIG execs.

    How about we do both–correct the bonus issue AND step our efforts in review and oversight. I am not going to lose one bit of sleep over the populist uprising….

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: