House Approves $97 Billion in War Funding

By Alan Stewart Carl | Related entries in Iraq, War


While some have worried that the Democratic controlled Congress might strip our war efforts of funding, that wasn’t the case in the House where members passed $97 billion in war funding by a vote of 368-60 — $12 billion more than President Obama requested.

The senate is in the process of passing a similar bill, making it almost a sure thing that Obama will get all the money he needs to fight our wars the way he wants. I wonder if a President McCain would have gotten the money as easily?

This entry was posted on Thursday, May 14th, 2009 and is filed under Iraq, War. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “House Approves $97 Billion in War Funding”

  1. ExiledIndependent Says:

    What, no outrage? No righteous indignation? C’mon lefties, at least make it *look* good.

  2. theWord Says:

    Just so we know what we should be outraged about. Is it that the funding is above board, on the books and not hidden? Is it that the veterans again are also being more heavily funded by the Democrats? Is it that there are still wars being funded? Is it that we should or should not be in Afganistan? If we know what you want us to be outraged perhaps we can oblige.

    I am outraged that America’s new motto could be “Holding ourselves to the highest principles when it is convenient, the timing is right, when it wouldn’t make us look bad and the Republicans don’t object.”

  3. Chris Says:

    This is pretty much exactly what I expected. Congress is never going to short-change the military, and obama made it clear where he stood when he was running for president – and he’s certainly not a pacifist.

Leave a Reply


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.

Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.

One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.

Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.

Related Posts: