Tea Party Socialist

By donar | Related entries in Political Graffiti


This entry was posted on Friday, February 24th, 2012 and is filed under Political Graffiti. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

13 Responses to “Tea Party Socialist”

  1. cranky critter Says:

    More supply is more supply.

  2. Angela Says:

    Creation of jobs.

  3. Jacob Says:

    Cranky: That’s not the point. But you know that. You’re just being cranky.

  4. cranky critter Says:

    Then please explain the point for me Jacob.

    How silly of me to presume that the US either benefits from producing more oil, or doesn’t benefit. How evern sillier of me to then think, “hmm, probably we DO benefit.”

  5. Angela Says:

    I’m not too well read on this issue, but it seems to me that countries that produce oil for the world market play games with supply so as to affect price. Increasing supply doens’t make lower prices inevitable. If the supply stays with us, demand may go up, and refineries may find themselves operating at max capacity, which would cause a price increase.

    Tea party socialist. I get it. I’m not impressed.

  6. Jacob Says:

    My impression is that the cartoon is highlighting the idea that “drill baby drill” folks think US oil will flow right into US gas tanks – a misconception Tea Party politicians certainly aren’t trying to dispel.

    I think a good many Tea Party folks response to the fact that our oil will go to the world market would be “‘eff that! It’s our oil! Give it to us!”. Kind of a hypocritical position, as noted above.

    But of course you’re correct, more supply is more supply and might even benefit us. That’s just not the point of the cartoon.

  7. cranky critter Says:

    I don’t see how that’s really a misconception worth quibbling over. What’s the evidence that tea partiers, as a group are afflicted with this slight oversimplification?

    What’s the problem with simply presuming that folks who say “drill baby drill” simply think the policy would potentially benefit America over the longer term in the form of lower fuel prices and a net increase in potential domestic supply?

  8. Jacob Says:

    What’s the problem with simply presuming that folks who say “drill baby drill” simply think the policy would potentially benefit America over the longer term in the form of lower fuel prices and a net increase in potential domestic supply?

    The problem is that I have yet to see evidence of thoughtful and nuanced Tea Party policy positions.

    I have no problem presuming that you might feel that way, but you are often thoughtful and nuanced. Also, you’ve probably never carried a protest sign reading “Government keep your hands off my Medicare!”

    I’m just saying, if we’re going to presume something about the Tea Party it’s not going to be a comprehensive grasp on the intricacies of the global oil market.

  9. rafrostick Says:

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/02/27/is-obama-really-to-blame-for-rising-gas-prices-do-you-really-care/ get read up on the issue, please

  10. WHQ Says:

    Well, it’s a cartoon. The question isn’t whether or not “drill, baby, drill” with an assumption that doing so will have a significant effect on oil and gas prices (justifying whatever environmental risks must be taken) is unique to Tea Partiers. The question is whether such a thing is sufficiently inconsistent with the stated views of Tea Partiers that it makes the Tea Party character in the cartoon inappropriate.

    I’ve gotten some chain e-mails putting forth very similar points of view from people I know to be at least sympathetic to the (very loose coalition known as the) Tea Party over the last few years, and this certainly sounds similar to some things Sarah Palin has said.

    The cartoon works, AFAICT, whether or not it makes a comprehensive statement about the Tea Party, which is likely impossible, anyway.

  11. Angela Says:

    Thanks rafro, I read the article. Also read an article on the Koch brothers and AFP. Always open to learning.

  12. Angela Says:

    At the risk of being off topic, (feel no need to comment on the cartoon), the companies (or governments, whatever the case may be) who ship goods globally, should the cost of oil continue to go up, would have to increase their bill for shipping. Imported goods, and using cheap labor outside of the borders, may not be as competitive in price, or as profitable, respectively, which would be good for the U.S.

  13. Scott S Says:

    Whether producing domestic oil lowers gas prices or not, it will generate jobs including exploration, production, transportation, maintenance, refinement and more investment into newer exploration technology or alternative technologies.

    New jobs lowers unemployment costs, and generates income tax. All positives when our economy is struggling and our deficits are growing.

    Right now, we are exporting dollars – let’s keep some of that in house by producing our own oil.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: