How to elect moderates

By Sean Aqui | Related entries in Elections, General Politics

I wrote this post yesterday as a guest blogger at Unity08, but I thought it was worth sharing here.

WHAT IT WILL TAKE
A lot of other bloggers have expounded on what it means to be a moderate, and on the evils of partisanship, and what’s wrong with the current way of doing things.

Me, I want to talk about the practicalities.

I strongly believe in the ideal behind Unity08. If we can make moderates a force of their own — just as conservatives and liberals have become forces within, but separate from, the two major parties — we can achieve several interrelated objectives. Among them:

1. Forcing elected officials to pay attention to moderates, rather than their partisan bases.

2. Giving moderate Republicans and Democrats a base of support independent of their party. That will make them less beholden to their party, which should lead to fewer party-line votes and more thoughtful and independent political debate.

3. Offering a lever for those moderates to recapture their parties and reestablish the long tradition of “meet in the middle” that the last 15 years of partisanship have all but erased.

4. Reasserting pragmatism over ideology, leading to legislation that thoughtfully addresses complex problems, instead of pursuing oversimplified or actively harmful agendas in order to conform to some predetermined principle.

The question, though, is how to achieve this in a winner-take-all electoral system dominated by two major parties, who have gerrymandered most districts to make them “safe” for one party or the other. Where is our leverage?

First we need to demonstrate the political clout of moderates. Sites such as this are a start, providing much-needed organization. But what will really force the parties to pay attention is fundraising. If supporting moderate viewpoints generates huge sums of cash, the parties will become more moderate. Rhetoric and ideology have power, but money is king.

So contribute to moderate candidates, wherever they may be. Support (or create) moderate PACs. Volunteer for campaigns. When party fundraisers call, tell them that you have already contributed to the moderates in the party and if they want a party-level donation they need to start addressing your concerns on a party level as well.

Even more importantly, convince others to do the same. If moderates indeed represent a large and decisive slice of the electorate, the parties will get the message loud and clear. Even if it doesn’t lead directly to election victories, it will strengthen the hand of moderates in both parties.

All the money in the world, though, will still have trouble overcoming gerrymandering. In the last midterm election in 2002, 96 percent of incumbents won re-election — down from 98 percent in 1998. How will moderates make inroads when the whole system is designed to insulate incumbents from the electorate?

This one requires a multipronged approach, with both short- and long-term strategies.

In the short term, the key is to note that seats are gerrymandered to make them safe for parties, not particular ideologies. If you don’t care about the party label, then the answer is simple: work to help moderates win their party’s nomination in a particular district. The more we can make a race be a choice between two moderates, the more we can make the gerrymandered system work for us by electing — and protecting — moderates.

At a minimum that means voting in primaries, and doing your homework on the candidates. But that’s not really enough, since at that point you’re just picking from a pre-selected group of candidates. What it really takes is getting involved in the party of your choice, so that moderate candidates stand a better chance of surviving the internal party debates that precede the public primaries. Anything that weakens the strangehold that partisans have on party organizations will help move the parties toward the center.

In the long term, moderates should actively support two initiatives intended to weaken the two-party duopoly: some form of instant-runoff voting, and some sort of district-drawing method that would force districts to be constructed according to objective criteria, with as little political involvement as possible.

That’s the strategy in a nutshell: reward parties and candidates for moderate stances, work to build moderate influence within parties, all while establishing electoral conditions that will enable moderates to get elected without being unduly beholden to their party bosses. It won’t be easy, and it won’t happen overnight. But that’s what politics is: hard work. Let’s get to it.


This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 25th, 2006 and is filed under Elections, General Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “How to elect moderates”

  1. Richard Winger Says:

    Next time you write a version of this article, please include ballot access reform. There are 14 states with ballot access lawsuits (based on the U.S. or state constitutions) pending. This is an active field of activism and it deserves to be included in your article.

  2. reader_iam Says:

    Great and useful post. My response.

  3. Stacey Dycus, Ben Westlund for Governor Says:

    Good point Richard. Because of a new law in Oregon it is more difficult for an independent to qualify for the ballot. Ben Westlund, a former R who is running as an I for Governor, has to gather 2-3 times the necessary signatures. It’s more expensive but we’re doing it though! We need 18,368, we started turning 36,000 signatures into counties this week. From here we have to navigate a cumbersome process.

    But its worth doing. Westlund’s campaign is tapping into dissatisfied I’s, R’s and D’s became everyone knows that extreme partisan politicsisis keeping us from solving real problems. He says its time to put ideas before ideologyand people before politics.

    A centrist independent can win in Oregon where 25% of voters aren’t ina major party. Helping credible centrist candidates like Westlund in ’06 is the way to jump start the movement for ’08.

  4. Sean Aqui Says:

    Wow, reader_iam. Thanks. I’m blushing!

    Richard: You’re right about ballot access. But ballot access alone won’t accomplish much. More important, in my opinion, is IRV — which would make voting for a third-party candidate something more than an act of faith or protest.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: