Everything Old Is New Again

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in General Politics, History

It seems like some Democrats still embrace Barry Goldwater’s style of conservatism, and I can’t say I disagree.

From Editor & Publisher:

NEW YORK An interview in this Sunday’s New York Times Magazine with C.C. Goldwater reveals that her HBO film to be aired Sept. 18 paints her late grandfather, Sen. Barry Goldwater, “as a kind of liberal,” with testimonials from Al Franken, Sen. Ted Kennedy, James Carville and Sen. Hillary Clinton.

In fact, Hillary campaigned for Goldwater in 1964 in his race for president against Lyndon Johnson. “Hillary was a Goldwater girl,” says the filmmaker, interviewed by Deborah Solomon. “She passed out cookies and lemonade at his campaign functions.”

The film — made on a budget of $800,000 — will note that the straight-talking Sen. Goldwater, author of the classic “The Conscience of a Conservative” (soon to be reissued by Princeton University Press) favored abortion rights and allowing gays in the military, and refused to attend President Nixon’s funeral because he “cheated” the country.

Interesting…I know that Goldwater inspired many of conservatives who ushered in the era of Ronald Reagan and are now crying foul at Dubya’s brand of politics. He also spoke out against the Republican party’s affiliation with the Left Behind crowd, and in particular called guys like Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell to the mat.

And let this passage from the book Before the Storm: Barry Goldwater and the Unmaking of the American Consensus shock and amaze you:

“Think of a senator winning the Democratic nomination in the year 2000 whose positions included halving the military budget, socializing the medical system, reregulating the communications and electrical industries, establishing a guaranteed minimum income for all Americans, and equalizing funding for all schools regardless of property valuationsâ€â€?and who promised to fire Alan Greenspan, counseled withdrawal from the World Trade Organization, and, for good measure, spoke warmly of adolescent sexual experimentation. He would lose in a landslide. He would be relegated to the ash heap of history. But if the precedent of 1964 were repeated, two years later the country would begin electing dozens of men and women just like him. And not many decades later, Republicans would have to proclaim softer versions of those positions to get taken seriously for their party’s nomination.”

What if Goldwater would have become President? Would the Republican party be where it is today?


This entry was posted on Friday, August 25th, 2006 and is filed under General Politics, History. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “Everything Old Is New Again”

  1. Glen Wishard Says:

    If Barry Goldwater had been elected president in 1964.

  2. DosPeros Says:

    In your heart you know he’s right, but in your gut you know he’s nuts.

  3. Polimom Says » Who moved the partisan lines? Says:

    [...] (H/T – Donklephant) [...]

  4. probligo Says:

    I can recall my father sitting and listening to the news (old steam radio days – 1964 was it Glen? That would be about right) and muttering to himself about “end of the world” if Goldwater were elected.

    Would the Republican Party be different now had he been elected?

    How different would the world be now had he been elected?

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: