<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Promises More Jobs, 90% In Private Sector</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2009/01/10/obama-promises-more-jobs-90-in-private-sector/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/01/10/obama-promises-more-jobs-90-in-private-sector/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/01/10/obama-promises-more-jobs-90-in-private-sector/comment-page-1/#comment-575753</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=12691#comment-575753</guid>
		<description>Lol, how did that work out for ya?  Has Obama created even one private sector job?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, how did that work out for ya?  Has Obama created even one private sector job?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim S</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/01/10/obama-promises-more-jobs-90-in-private-sector/comment-page-1/#comment-434975</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=12691#comment-434975</guid>
		<description>Yes, many state jobs are needed. We need more people to help provide services to the unemployed because &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2008/12/predicting_the_1.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;there are going to be a lot of them for the foreseeable future&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, many state jobs are needed. We need more people to help provide services to the unemployed because <a href="http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2008/12/predicting_the_1.html" >there are going to be a lot of them for the foreseeable future</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wj</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/01/10/obama-promises-more-jobs-90-in-private-sector/comment-page-1/#comment-434940</link>
		<dc:creator>wj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=12691#comment-434940</guid>
		<description>Allow me to take issue with the statement, regarding the state government jobs to be saved: &quot;we know those jobs are needed because they already exist.&quot;  Really?

No doubt that will be true of some of the state government jobs that are saved.  But to contend that all state government jobs which currently exist are needed is nonsense.  If there is a state which does not have a horde of (overpaid) jobs on state boards and commissions which are totally unnecessary, I have yet to encounter it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allow me to take issue with the statement, regarding the state government jobs to be saved: &#8220;we know those jobs are needed because they already exist.&#8221;  Really?</p>
<p>No doubt that will be true of some of the state government jobs that are saved.  But to contend that all state government jobs which currently exist are needed is nonsense.  If there is a state which does not have a horde of (overpaid) jobs on state boards and commissions which are totally unnecessary, I have yet to encounter it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alistair</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/01/10/obama-promises-more-jobs-90-in-private-sector/comment-page-1/#comment-434926</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 04:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=12691#comment-434926</guid>
		<description>One thing that I believe that would help stimulate the economy either in private sector or the fed gov&#039;t is trying to include people with disabilities so they can in this economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that I believe that would help stimulate the economy either in private sector or the fed gov&#8217;t is trying to include people with disabilities so they can in this economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/01/10/obama-promises-more-jobs-90-in-private-sector/comment-page-1/#comment-434923</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=12691#comment-434923</guid>
		<description>The job-creation numbers are impressive, but I hope the other details of the plan don&#039;t get ignored because of they don&#039;t make great headlines.  I think we need the stimulus plan, and it needs to be very large, but Congress needs to make sure that it continues providing benefits in the long term, not just a shot in the arm for the short term.

The infrastructure spending will help keep the economy growing in the long term, but it would also be helpful if Congress could find a way to encourage businesses to invest in infrastructure as well.  Possibly they could do this by making sure there are fewer unnecessary regulations that dissuade businesses from making those investments.  There seem to be many businesses that have money to invest, but not as many that are actively investing in any forward-thinking enterprise.  Hopefully Congress can find ways to get that money flowing.

The tax cuts on businesses would certainly be helpful, especially on small businesses or businesses in sectors where there is potential for significant job creation.  We need the businesses like that to be able to resume their traditional role as the engine of our economy.  The government can certainly assist the process getting started, but businesses will actually provide the growth.

I think the aid to the state governments is also needed, because the programs that the state governments support are needed for sustained growth.  For instance, the state governments support schools and public workforce training programs.  It is important to make sure both of those programs survive to make sure we are able to provide workers for whichever sectors of the economy are providing the jobs.

I recently saw that the Friends of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is working with Congress to make sure that they take these things into account when they are designing the stimulus package.  They have a petition that I encourage everyone to sign to make sure Congress knows that we want the economy fixed - but we want it fixed for the long-term - http://www.friendsoftheuschamber.com/takeaction/index.cfm?ID=76</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The job-creation numbers are impressive, but I hope the other details of the plan don&#8217;t get ignored because of they don&#8217;t make great headlines.  I think we need the stimulus plan, and it needs to be very large, but Congress needs to make sure that it continues providing benefits in the long term, not just a shot in the arm for the short term.</p>
<p>The infrastructure spending will help keep the economy growing in the long term, but it would also be helpful if Congress could find a way to encourage businesses to invest in infrastructure as well.  Possibly they could do this by making sure there are fewer unnecessary regulations that dissuade businesses from making those investments.  There seem to be many businesses that have money to invest, but not as many that are actively investing in any forward-thinking enterprise.  Hopefully Congress can find ways to get that money flowing.</p>
<p>The tax cuts on businesses would certainly be helpful, especially on small businesses or businesses in sectors where there is potential for significant job creation.  We need the businesses like that to be able to resume their traditional role as the engine of our economy.  The government can certainly assist the process getting started, but businesses will actually provide the growth.</p>
<p>I think the aid to the state governments is also needed, because the programs that the state governments support are needed for sustained growth.  For instance, the state governments support schools and public workforce training programs.  It is important to make sure both of those programs survive to make sure we are able to provide workers for whichever sectors of the economy are providing the jobs.</p>
<p>I recently saw that the Friends of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is working with Congress to make sure that they take these things into account when they are designing the stimulus package.  They have a petition that I encourage everyone to sign to make sure Congress knows that we want the economy fixed &#8211; but we want it fixed for the long-term &#8211; <a href="http://www.friendsoftheuschamber.com/takeaction/index.cfm?ID=76" >http://www.friendsoftheuschamber.com/takeaction/index.cfm?ID=76</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alistair</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/01/10/obama-promises-more-jobs-90-in-private-sector/comment-page-1/#comment-434920</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=12691#comment-434920</guid>
		<description>Jim S:

Your are correct that government should get involve but we have to very careful in wasteful spending other wise critics Republicans and conservative will begin critizing him as a big spending liberal. Something that they always do to Democratic President. If jobs are created from the private sector it will be difficult for the Republican to make gains in the 2010 and 2012 election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim S:</p>
<p>Your are correct that government should get involve but we have to very careful in wasteful spending other wise critics Republicans and conservative will begin critizing him as a big spending liberal. Something that they always do to Democratic President. If jobs are created from the private sector it will be difficult for the Republican to make gains in the 2010 and 2012 election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim S</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/01/10/obama-promises-more-jobs-90-in-private-sector/comment-page-1/#comment-434918</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=12691#comment-434918</guid>
		<description>But we desperately &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;need&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; bigger government. If we are going to have safe products imported from China and other low wage Asian countries the agencies responsible for consumer safety need massive hiring and training of people who will be able to inspect factories in those countries. If the countries involved have a problem with us sending inspectors then we need to have a problem with continuing to import products from them. The FDA also needs increased staff for domestic safeguards of our food supply. 

What about adequate regulation of the financial sector? The financial instruments and organizations that have gotten away with no oversight at all must be regulated and current staffs just aren&#039;t large enough. &lt;b&gt;Don&#039;t contract these things out!&lt;/b&gt; We&#039;d just wind up needing overseers for the overseers. As it is any additional funds released from TARP need a heck of a lot more supervision than what we&#039;ve seen so far. That will keep a lot of people busy.

In addition we are in desperate need of a drastic expansion of the NIH and other public health agencies.

How many other things have I missed after years of people believing blindly that the private sector could take care of almost everything?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But we desperately <b><i>need</i></b> bigger government. If we are going to have safe products imported from China and other low wage Asian countries the agencies responsible for consumer safety need massive hiring and training of people who will be able to inspect factories in those countries. If the countries involved have a problem with us sending inspectors then we need to have a problem with continuing to import products from them. The FDA also needs increased staff for domestic safeguards of our food supply. </p>
<p>What about adequate regulation of the financial sector? The financial instruments and organizations that have gotten away with no oversight at all must be regulated and current staffs just aren&#8217;t large enough. <b>Don&#8217;t contract these things out!</b> We&#8217;d just wind up needing overseers for the overseers. As it is any additional funds released from TARP need a heck of a lot more supervision than what we&#8217;ve seen so far. That will keep a lot of people busy.</p>
<p>In addition we are in desperate need of a drastic expansion of the NIH and other public health agencies.</p>
<p>How many other things have I missed after years of people believing blindly that the private sector could take care of almost everything?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

